Zolin and Pizzi: defining necessity from noncontingency

Ian Lloyd Humberstone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The point of the present paper is to draw attention to some interesting similarities, as well as differences, between the approaches to the logic of noncontingency of Evgeni Zolin and of Claudio Pizzi. Though neither of them refers to the work of the other, each is concerned with the definability of a (normally behaving, though not in general truth-implying) notion of necessity in terms of noncontingency, standard boolean connectives and additional but non-modal expressive resources. The notion of definability involved is different in the two cases ( external for Zolin, internal for Pizzi), as are the additional resources: infinitary conjunction in the case of Zolin, and for Pizzi, first, propositional quantification, and then, later, most ingeniously, the use of a propositional constant. As well as surveying and comparing of the work of these authors, the discussion includes some some novelties, such as the confirmation of a conjecture of Zolin s (Theorem 2.7).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1275 - 1302
Number of pages28
JournalErkenntnis
Volume78
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this