Zhang's guidelines vs WHO guidelines for diagnosing labour dystocia

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOtherpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e9
Number of pages1
JournalThe Lancet
Volume394
Issue number10198
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Aug 2019

Cite this

@article{ac0c14c01b294c25a759dbfd41ab5c85,
title = "Zhang's guidelines vs WHO guidelines for diagnosing labour dystocia",
author = "A. Kroushev and Rolnik, {Daniel L.} and Mol, {B. W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31127-4",
language = "English",
volume = "394",
pages = "e9",
journal = "The Lancet",
issn = "0140-6736",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "10198",

}

Zhang's guidelines vs WHO guidelines for diagnosing labour dystocia. / Kroushev, A.; Rolnik, Daniel L.; Mol, B. W.

In: The Lancet, Vol. 394, No. 10198, 17.08.2019, p. e9.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Zhang's guidelines vs WHO guidelines for diagnosing labour dystocia

AU - Kroushev, A.

AU - Rolnik, Daniel L.

AU - Mol, B. W.

PY - 2019/8/17

Y1 - 2019/8/17

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070566166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31127-4

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31127-4

M3 - Letter

VL - 394

SP - e9

JO - The Lancet

JF - The Lancet

SN - 0140-6736

IS - 10198

ER -