You be the judge: no thanks!

Arie Freiberg; Kate Warner; Caroline Spiranovic; Julia Davis

doi:10.1177/1037969X18792109

You be the judge: no thanks!

Arie Freiberg, Kate Warner, Caroline Spiranovic, Julia Davis

Law Academic

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In the light of proposals to give jurors a sentencing role in response to media portrayals of judges as soft on crime and out of touch, this article reports on a study which explored jurors’ thoughts about such a role using survey questions and interviews. Most shied away from such a role.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	154-159
Number of pages	6
Journal	Alternative Law Journal
Volume	43
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X18792109
Publication status	Published - Sept 2018

Keywords

Jurors’ views
Jury
Sentencing role

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1177/1037969X18792109

252187004-oaFinal published version, 153 KB

Cite this

@article{f29c69ef017c42a4ab25ceaf272ad1bf,

title = "You be the judge: no thanks!",

abstract = "In the light of proposals to give jurors a sentencing role in response to media portrayals of judges as soft on crime and out of touch, this article reports on a study which explored jurors{\textquoteright} thoughts about such a role using survey questions and interviews. Most shied away from such a role.",

keywords = "Jurors{\textquoteright} views, Jury, Sentencing role",

author = "Arie Freiberg and Kate Warner and Caroline Spiranovic and Julia Davis",

year = "2018",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1177/1037969X18792109",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "154--159",

journal = "Alternative Law Journal",

issn = "1037-969X",

publisher = "Legal Service Bulletin Co-operative Ltd",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - You be the judge

T2 - no thanks!

AU - Freiberg, Arie

AU - Warner, Kate

AU - Spiranovic, Caroline

AU - Davis, Julia

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - In the light of proposals to give jurors a sentencing role in response to media portrayals of judges as soft on crime and out of touch, this article reports on a study which explored jurors’ thoughts about such a role using survey questions and interviews. Most shied away from such a role.

AB - In the light of proposals to give jurors a sentencing role in response to media portrayals of judges as soft on crime and out of touch, this article reports on a study which explored jurors’ thoughts about such a role using survey questions and interviews. Most shied away from such a role.

KW - Jurors’ views

KW - Jury

KW - Sentencing role

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054011570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1037969X18792109

DO - 10.1177/1037969X18792109

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85054011570

SN - 1037-969X

VL - 43

SP - 154

EP - 159

JO - Alternative Law Journal

JF - Alternative Law Journal

IS - 3

ER -

You be the judge: no thanks!

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Using jurors to gauge informed public opinion on sentencing

Cite this

You be the judge: no thanks!

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Projects

Using jurors to gauge informed public opinion on sentencing

Cite this