Workshop report: Mental representations and discrete choice behaviour: State-of-the-art and avenues for future research

Benedict D C Dellaert, Theo A Arentze, Caspar G Chorus, Harmen Oppewal, Geert Wets

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter considers the measurement and modelling of mental representations underlying individuals? choice behaviour. The premise of the study of such mental representations (MRs) is that an individual?s mental construction of a choice problem plays an important role in preference formation, especially in the context of the complex choice situations such as involved in activity-travel behaviour. The measurement of MRs is a key problem. It requires the availability of a cognitive mapping method that can take specific decision task characteristics into account. Existing cognitive mapping methods, such as proposed in Kearney and Kaplan (1997), Eden and Ackermann (1998), and Christensen and Olsen (2002), cannot readily be used for this purpose. These traditional cognitive mapping techniques focus on knowledge and values not related to a specific situation or decision task. In contrast, MRs underlying decision making concern specific cognitions that are triggered by a given decision problem and should allow the decision maker (DM) to assess outcomes of actions in terms of needs that are activated in the decision situation. To model and measure such cognitions, recently new methodology has been developed based on the concept of active causal networks. Specifically, Arentze et al. (2008) proposed the decision network (DN) as a suitable formalism. A DN is an extension of a Bayesian Network (BN).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationChoice Modelling: The State of the Art and the State of Practice
EditorsStephane Hess, Andrew Daly
Place of PublicationCheltenham UK
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Pages107 - 124
Number of pages18
Edition1st
ISBN (Print)9781781007266
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this

Dellaert, B. D. C., Arentze, T. A., Chorus, C. G., Oppewal, H., & Wets, G. (2013). Workshop report: Mental representations and discrete choice behaviour: State-of-the-art and avenues for future research. In S. Hess, & A. Daly (Eds.), Choice Modelling: The State of the Art and the State of Practice (1st ed., pp. 107 - 124). Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781007273
Dellaert, Benedict D C ; Arentze, Theo A ; Chorus, Caspar G ; Oppewal, Harmen ; Wets, Geert. / Workshop report: Mental representations and discrete choice behaviour: State-of-the-art and avenues for future research. Choice Modelling: The State of the Art and the State of Practice. editor / Stephane Hess ; Andrew Daly. 1st. ed. Cheltenham UK : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013. pp. 107 - 124
@inbook{1dc6a39afb60404190e63eaa10c090ce,
title = "Workshop report: Mental representations and discrete choice behaviour: State-of-the-art and avenues for future research",
abstract = "This chapter considers the measurement and modelling of mental representations underlying individuals? choice behaviour. The premise of the study of such mental representations (MRs) is that an individual?s mental construction of a choice problem plays an important role in preference formation, especially in the context of the complex choice situations such as involved in activity-travel behaviour. The measurement of MRs is a key problem. It requires the availability of a cognitive mapping method that can take specific decision task characteristics into account. Existing cognitive mapping methods, such as proposed in Kearney and Kaplan (1997), Eden and Ackermann (1998), and Christensen and Olsen (2002), cannot readily be used for this purpose. These traditional cognitive mapping techniques focus on knowledge and values not related to a specific situation or decision task. In contrast, MRs underlying decision making concern specific cognitions that are triggered by a given decision problem and should allow the decision maker (DM) to assess outcomes of actions in terms of needs that are activated in the decision situation. To model and measure such cognitions, recently new methodology has been developed based on the concept of active causal networks. Specifically, Arentze et al. (2008) proposed the decision network (DN) as a suitable formalism. A DN is an extension of a Bayesian Network (BN).",
author = "Dellaert, {Benedict D C} and Arentze, {Theo A} and Chorus, {Caspar G} and Harmen Oppewal and Geert Wets",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.4337/9781781007273",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781781007266",
pages = "107 -- 124",
editor = "Stephane Hess and Andrew Daly",
booktitle = "Choice Modelling: The State of the Art and the State of Practice",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "1st",

}

Dellaert, BDC, Arentze, TA, Chorus, CG, Oppewal, H & Wets, G 2013, Workshop report: Mental representations and discrete choice behaviour: State-of-the-art and avenues for future research. in S Hess & A Daly (eds), Choice Modelling: The State of the Art and the State of Practice. 1st edn, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham UK, pp. 107 - 124. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781007273

Workshop report: Mental representations and discrete choice behaviour: State-of-the-art and avenues for future research. / Dellaert, Benedict D C; Arentze, Theo A; Chorus, Caspar G; Oppewal, Harmen; Wets, Geert.

Choice Modelling: The State of the Art and the State of Practice. ed. / Stephane Hess; Andrew Daly. 1st. ed. Cheltenham UK : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013. p. 107 - 124.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Workshop report: Mental representations and discrete choice behaviour: State-of-the-art and avenues for future research

AU - Dellaert, Benedict D C

AU - Arentze, Theo A

AU - Chorus, Caspar G

AU - Oppewal, Harmen

AU - Wets, Geert

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This chapter considers the measurement and modelling of mental representations underlying individuals? choice behaviour. The premise of the study of such mental representations (MRs) is that an individual?s mental construction of a choice problem plays an important role in preference formation, especially in the context of the complex choice situations such as involved in activity-travel behaviour. The measurement of MRs is a key problem. It requires the availability of a cognitive mapping method that can take specific decision task characteristics into account. Existing cognitive mapping methods, such as proposed in Kearney and Kaplan (1997), Eden and Ackermann (1998), and Christensen and Olsen (2002), cannot readily be used for this purpose. These traditional cognitive mapping techniques focus on knowledge and values not related to a specific situation or decision task. In contrast, MRs underlying decision making concern specific cognitions that are triggered by a given decision problem and should allow the decision maker (DM) to assess outcomes of actions in terms of needs that are activated in the decision situation. To model and measure such cognitions, recently new methodology has been developed based on the concept of active causal networks. Specifically, Arentze et al. (2008) proposed the decision network (DN) as a suitable formalism. A DN is an extension of a Bayesian Network (BN).

AB - This chapter considers the measurement and modelling of mental representations underlying individuals? choice behaviour. The premise of the study of such mental representations (MRs) is that an individual?s mental construction of a choice problem plays an important role in preference formation, especially in the context of the complex choice situations such as involved in activity-travel behaviour. The measurement of MRs is a key problem. It requires the availability of a cognitive mapping method that can take specific decision task characteristics into account. Existing cognitive mapping methods, such as proposed in Kearney and Kaplan (1997), Eden and Ackermann (1998), and Christensen and Olsen (2002), cannot readily be used for this purpose. These traditional cognitive mapping techniques focus on knowledge and values not related to a specific situation or decision task. In contrast, MRs underlying decision making concern specific cognitions that are triggered by a given decision problem and should allow the decision maker (DM) to assess outcomes of actions in terms of needs that are activated in the decision situation. To model and measure such cognitions, recently new methodology has been developed based on the concept of active causal networks. Specifically, Arentze et al. (2008) proposed the decision network (DN) as a suitable formalism. A DN is an extension of a Bayesian Network (BN).

U2 - 10.4337/9781781007273

DO - 10.4337/9781781007273

M3 - Chapter (Book)

SN - 9781781007266

SP - 107

EP - 124

BT - Choice Modelling: The State of the Art and the State of Practice

A2 - Hess, Stephane

A2 - Daly, Andrew

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

CY - Cheltenham UK

ER -

Dellaert BDC, Arentze TA, Chorus CG, Oppewal H, Wets G. Workshop report: Mental representations and discrete choice behaviour: State-of-the-art and avenues for future research. In Hess S, Daly A, editors, Choice Modelling: The State of the Art and the State of Practice. 1st ed. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. 2013. p. 107 - 124 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781007273