Women's views and experiences of publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia

A cross-sectional survey

Della A. Forster, Heather McKay, Mary Ann Davey, Rhonda Small, Fiona Cullinane, Michelle Newton, Rhonda Powell, Helen L. McLachlan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It is critical women's voices are heard if there is to be more widespread implementation of midwifery-led continuity models. Publicly-funded homebirth is one such model, yet there has been limited systematic evaluation from the women's perspective. Aim: Examine women's experiences of and views about the two publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. All eligible women enrolled in the two pilot homebirth programs in metropolitan Melbourne whose infants were eight weeks of age or more during the evaluation period were invited to participate in a postal survey. A structured questionnaire was used, with some open-ended questions to enable extra comments. We explored women's reasons for choosing homebirth; views of care; experience of labour and birth; views on transfer; and overall experience of the homebirth program. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Simple thematic analysis was used for open-ended questions. Findings: The survey response rate was 71% (96/136). A high percentage of women rated their care as ‘Very good’: pregnancy 81%; labour and birth 90%; and the early postpartum period 83%. Women reported low levels of anxiety during labour and birth, were able to express their feelings, felt in control, and coped physically and emotionally better than they had expected. They felt well supported by midwives and overall reported very positive experiences of the homebirth programs. Conclusions: These two publicly-funded homebirth pilot programs demonstrated very positive care ratings by women. These findings, along with the clinical outcomes (reported separately), support the continuation and expansion of the program.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-230
Number of pages10
JournalWomen and Birth
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Keywords

  • Homebirth
  • Maternity/pregnancy care
  • Public care
  • Satisfaction
  • Women's views

Cite this

Forster, Della A. ; McKay, Heather ; Davey, Mary Ann ; Small, Rhonda ; Cullinane, Fiona ; Newton, Michelle ; Powell, Rhonda ; McLachlan, Helen L. / Women's views and experiences of publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia : A cross-sectional survey. In: Women and Birth. 2019 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 221-230.
@article{9f014e7873f14d78aeadf1e6a9fb3354,
title = "Women's views and experiences of publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia: A cross-sectional survey",
abstract = "Background: It is critical women's voices are heard if there is to be more widespread implementation of midwifery-led continuity models. Publicly-funded homebirth is one such model, yet there has been limited systematic evaluation from the women's perspective. Aim: Examine women's experiences of and views about the two publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. All eligible women enrolled in the two pilot homebirth programs in metropolitan Melbourne whose infants were eight weeks of age or more during the evaluation period were invited to participate in a postal survey. A structured questionnaire was used, with some open-ended questions to enable extra comments. We explored women's reasons for choosing homebirth; views of care; experience of labour and birth; views on transfer; and overall experience of the homebirth program. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Simple thematic analysis was used for open-ended questions. Findings: The survey response rate was 71{\%} (96/136). A high percentage of women rated their care as ‘Very good’: pregnancy 81{\%}; labour and birth 90{\%}; and the early postpartum period 83{\%}. Women reported low levels of anxiety during labour and birth, were able to express their feelings, felt in control, and coped physically and emotionally better than they had expected. They felt well supported by midwives and overall reported very positive experiences of the homebirth programs. Conclusions: These two publicly-funded homebirth pilot programs demonstrated very positive care ratings by women. These findings, along with the clinical outcomes (reported separately), support the continuation and expansion of the program.",
keywords = "Homebirth, Maternity/pregnancy care, Public care, Satisfaction, Women's views",
author = "Forster, {Della A.} and Heather McKay and Davey, {Mary Ann} and Rhonda Small and Fiona Cullinane and Michelle Newton and Rhonda Powell and McLachlan, {Helen L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.019",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "221--230",
journal = "Women and Birth",
issn = "1871-5192",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Forster, DA, McKay, H, Davey, MA, Small, R, Cullinane, F, Newton, M, Powell, R & McLachlan, HL 2019, 'Women's views and experiences of publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia: A cross-sectional survey', Women and Birth, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.019

Women's views and experiences of publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia : A cross-sectional survey. / Forster, Della A.; McKay, Heather; Davey, Mary Ann; Small, Rhonda; Cullinane, Fiona; Newton, Michelle; Powell, Rhonda; McLachlan, Helen L.

In: Women and Birth, Vol. 32, No. 3, 06.2019, p. 221-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women's views and experiences of publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia

T2 - A cross-sectional survey

AU - Forster, Della A.

AU - McKay, Heather

AU - Davey, Mary Ann

AU - Small, Rhonda

AU - Cullinane, Fiona

AU - Newton, Michelle

AU - Powell, Rhonda

AU - McLachlan, Helen L.

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Background: It is critical women's voices are heard if there is to be more widespread implementation of midwifery-led continuity models. Publicly-funded homebirth is one such model, yet there has been limited systematic evaluation from the women's perspective. Aim: Examine women's experiences of and views about the two publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. All eligible women enrolled in the two pilot homebirth programs in metropolitan Melbourne whose infants were eight weeks of age or more during the evaluation period were invited to participate in a postal survey. A structured questionnaire was used, with some open-ended questions to enable extra comments. We explored women's reasons for choosing homebirth; views of care; experience of labour and birth; views on transfer; and overall experience of the homebirth program. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Simple thematic analysis was used for open-ended questions. Findings: The survey response rate was 71% (96/136). A high percentage of women rated their care as ‘Very good’: pregnancy 81%; labour and birth 90%; and the early postpartum period 83%. Women reported low levels of anxiety during labour and birth, were able to express their feelings, felt in control, and coped physically and emotionally better than they had expected. They felt well supported by midwives and overall reported very positive experiences of the homebirth programs. Conclusions: These two publicly-funded homebirth pilot programs demonstrated very positive care ratings by women. These findings, along with the clinical outcomes (reported separately), support the continuation and expansion of the program.

AB - Background: It is critical women's voices are heard if there is to be more widespread implementation of midwifery-led continuity models. Publicly-funded homebirth is one such model, yet there has been limited systematic evaluation from the women's perspective. Aim: Examine women's experiences of and views about the two publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. All eligible women enrolled in the two pilot homebirth programs in metropolitan Melbourne whose infants were eight weeks of age or more during the evaluation period were invited to participate in a postal survey. A structured questionnaire was used, with some open-ended questions to enable extra comments. We explored women's reasons for choosing homebirth; views of care; experience of labour and birth; views on transfer; and overall experience of the homebirth program. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Simple thematic analysis was used for open-ended questions. Findings: The survey response rate was 71% (96/136). A high percentage of women rated their care as ‘Very good’: pregnancy 81%; labour and birth 90%; and the early postpartum period 83%. Women reported low levels of anxiety during labour and birth, were able to express their feelings, felt in control, and coped physically and emotionally better than they had expected. They felt well supported by midwives and overall reported very positive experiences of the homebirth programs. Conclusions: These two publicly-funded homebirth pilot programs demonstrated very positive care ratings by women. These findings, along with the clinical outcomes (reported separately), support the continuation and expansion of the program.

KW - Homebirth

KW - Maternity/pregnancy care

KW - Public care

KW - Satisfaction

KW - Women's views

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051409911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.019

DO - 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.019

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 221

EP - 230

JO - Women and Birth

JF - Women and Birth

SN - 1871-5192

IS - 3

ER -