Women’s behavior as implied consent

Male “reasonableness” in Australian rape law

Rachael Louise Burgin, Asher Flynn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Defendants in rape trials rely on narratives of “implied consent,” situating women’s ordinary behavior as having indicated consent. Such narratives ignore women’s experiences, instead describing a male perpetrator’s subjective interpretation or inference of the woman’s actions. Implied consent narratives should have been eliminated by law reform introducing affirmative consent that redirected attention to steps that the perpetrator took to ensure the other party was consenting. Drawing from an Australian study, this article uses rape trial excerpts from the state of Victoria to argue that implied consent narratives endure in rape trials and form the key factor shaping a reasonable belief defense. Rape law allows men to interpret women’s behavior without restriction, providing evidence of the persisting influence of misogynistic views of women in law and legal practice. This article contributes to feminist jurisprudential and theoretical efforts to generate understandings of the ways rigid gender norms are enacted and performed in rape trials.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCriminology and Criminal Justice
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019

Keywords

  • consent
  • rape law
  • Sexual violence
  • gender

Cite this

@article{e7804b9ca6dd44f4a74de3a59866a5da,
title = "Women’s behavior as implied consent: Male “reasonableness” in Australian rape law",
abstract = "Defendants in rape trials rely on narratives of “implied consent,” situating women’s ordinary behavior as having indicated consent. Such narratives ignore women’s experiences, instead describing a male perpetrator’s subjective interpretation or inference of the woman’s actions. Implied consent narratives should have been eliminated by law reform introducing affirmative consent that redirected attention to steps that the perpetrator took to ensure the other party was consenting. Drawing from an Australian study, this article uses rape trial excerpts from the state of Victoria to argue that implied consent narratives endure in rape trials and form the key factor shaping a reasonable belief defense. Rape law allows men to interpret women’s behavior without restriction, providing evidence of the persisting influence of misogynistic views of women in law and legal practice. This article contributes to feminist jurisprudential and theoretical efforts to generate understandings of the ways rigid gender norms are enacted and performed in rape trials.",
keywords = "consent, rape law, Sexual violence, gender",
author = "Burgin, {Rachael Louise} and Asher Flynn",
year = "2019",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895819880953",
language = "English",
journal = "Criminology and Criminal Justice",
issn = "1748-8958",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Women’s behavior as implied consent : Male “reasonableness” in Australian rape law. / Burgin, Rachael Louise; Flynn, Asher.

In: Criminology and Criminal Justice, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women’s behavior as implied consent

T2 - Male “reasonableness” in Australian rape law

AU - Burgin, Rachael Louise

AU - Flynn, Asher

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Defendants in rape trials rely on narratives of “implied consent,” situating women’s ordinary behavior as having indicated consent. Such narratives ignore women’s experiences, instead describing a male perpetrator’s subjective interpretation or inference of the woman’s actions. Implied consent narratives should have been eliminated by law reform introducing affirmative consent that redirected attention to steps that the perpetrator took to ensure the other party was consenting. Drawing from an Australian study, this article uses rape trial excerpts from the state of Victoria to argue that implied consent narratives endure in rape trials and form the key factor shaping a reasonable belief defense. Rape law allows men to interpret women’s behavior without restriction, providing evidence of the persisting influence of misogynistic views of women in law and legal practice. This article contributes to feminist jurisprudential and theoretical efforts to generate understandings of the ways rigid gender norms are enacted and performed in rape trials.

AB - Defendants in rape trials rely on narratives of “implied consent,” situating women’s ordinary behavior as having indicated consent. Such narratives ignore women’s experiences, instead describing a male perpetrator’s subjective interpretation or inference of the woman’s actions. Implied consent narratives should have been eliminated by law reform introducing affirmative consent that redirected attention to steps that the perpetrator took to ensure the other party was consenting. Drawing from an Australian study, this article uses rape trial excerpts from the state of Victoria to argue that implied consent narratives endure in rape trials and form the key factor shaping a reasonable belief defense. Rape law allows men to interpret women’s behavior without restriction, providing evidence of the persisting influence of misogynistic views of women in law and legal practice. This article contributes to feminist jurisprudential and theoretical efforts to generate understandings of the ways rigid gender norms are enacted and performed in rape trials.

KW - consent

KW - rape law

KW - Sexual violence

KW - gender

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895819880953

DO - https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895819880953

M3 - Article

JO - Criminology and Criminal Justice

JF - Criminology and Criminal Justice

SN - 1748-8958

ER -