Windmill-task as a New Quantitative and Objective Assessment for Mirror Movements in Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

A Pilot Study

Ingar Marie Zielinski, Bert Steenbergen, Anna Schmidt, Katrijn Klingels, Cristina Simon Martinez, Pascal de Water, Brian Hoare

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To introduce the Windmill-task, a new objective assessment tool to quantify the presence of mirror movements (MMs) in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), which are typically assessed with the observation-based Woods and Teuber scale (W&T). Design: Prospective, observational, cohort pilot study. Setting: Children's hospital. Participants: Prospective cohort of children (N=23) with UCP (age range, 6–15y, mean age, 10.5±2.7y). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The concurrent validity of the Windmill-task is assessed, and the sensitivity and specificity for MM detection are compared between both assessments. To assess the concurrent validity, Windmill-task data are compared with W&T data using Spearman rank correlations (ρ) for 2 conditions: affected hand moving vs less affected hand moving. Sensitivity and specificity are compared by measuring the mean percentage of children being assessed inconsistently across both assessments. Results: Outcomes of both assessments correlated significantly (affected hand moving: ρ=.520; P=.005; less affected hand moving: ρ=.488; P=.009). However, many children displayed MMs on the Windmill-task, but not on the W&T (sensitivity: affected hand moving: 27.5%; less affected hand moving: 40.6%). Only 2 children displayed MMs on the W&T, but not on the Windmill-task (specificity: affected hand moving: 2.9%; less affected hand moving: 1.4%). Conclusions: The Windmill-task seems to be a valid tool to assess MMs in children with UCP and has an additional advantage of sensitivity to detect MMs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1547-1552
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume99
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Child
  • Movement
  • Rehabilitation
  • Upper extremity

Cite this

Zielinski, Ingar Marie ; Steenbergen, Bert ; Schmidt, Anna ; Klingels, Katrijn ; Simon Martinez, Cristina ; de Water, Pascal ; Hoare, Brian. / Windmill-task as a New Quantitative and Objective Assessment for Mirror Movements in Unilateral Cerebral Palsy : A Pilot Study. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2018 ; Vol. 99, No. 8. pp. 1547-1552.
@article{6b0ce48154a548429c58c4e79f8bf265,
title = "Windmill-task as a New Quantitative and Objective Assessment for Mirror Movements in Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study",
abstract = "Objective: To introduce the Windmill-task, a new objective assessment tool to quantify the presence of mirror movements (MMs) in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), which are typically assessed with the observation-based Woods and Teuber scale (W&T). Design: Prospective, observational, cohort pilot study. Setting: Children's hospital. Participants: Prospective cohort of children (N=23) with UCP (age range, 6–15y, mean age, 10.5±2.7y). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The concurrent validity of the Windmill-task is assessed, and the sensitivity and specificity for MM detection are compared between both assessments. To assess the concurrent validity, Windmill-task data are compared with W&T data using Spearman rank correlations (ρ) for 2 conditions: affected hand moving vs less affected hand moving. Sensitivity and specificity are compared by measuring the mean percentage of children being assessed inconsistently across both assessments. Results: Outcomes of both assessments correlated significantly (affected hand moving: ρ=.520; P=.005; less affected hand moving: ρ=.488; P=.009). However, many children displayed MMs on the Windmill-task, but not on the W&T (sensitivity: affected hand moving: 27.5{\%}; less affected hand moving: 40.6{\%}). Only 2 children displayed MMs on the W&T, but not on the Windmill-task (specificity: affected hand moving: 2.9{\%}; less affected hand moving: 1.4{\%}). Conclusions: The Windmill-task seems to be a valid tool to assess MMs in children with UCP and has an additional advantage of sensitivity to detect MMs.",
keywords = "Child, Movement, Rehabilitation, Upper extremity",
author = "Zielinski, {Ingar Marie} and Bert Steenbergen and Anna Schmidt and Katrijn Klingels and {Simon Martinez}, Cristina and {de Water}, Pascal and Brian Hoare",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.035",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "1547--1552",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "8",

}

Windmill-task as a New Quantitative and Objective Assessment for Mirror Movements in Unilateral Cerebral Palsy : A Pilot Study. / Zielinski, Ingar Marie; Steenbergen, Bert; Schmidt, Anna; Klingels, Katrijn; Simon Martinez, Cristina; de Water, Pascal; Hoare, Brian.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 99, No. 8, 01.08.2018, p. 1547-1552.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Windmill-task as a New Quantitative and Objective Assessment for Mirror Movements in Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

T2 - A Pilot Study

AU - Zielinski, Ingar Marie

AU - Steenbergen, Bert

AU - Schmidt, Anna

AU - Klingels, Katrijn

AU - Simon Martinez, Cristina

AU - de Water, Pascal

AU - Hoare, Brian

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Objective: To introduce the Windmill-task, a new objective assessment tool to quantify the presence of mirror movements (MMs) in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), which are typically assessed with the observation-based Woods and Teuber scale (W&T). Design: Prospective, observational, cohort pilot study. Setting: Children's hospital. Participants: Prospective cohort of children (N=23) with UCP (age range, 6–15y, mean age, 10.5±2.7y). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The concurrent validity of the Windmill-task is assessed, and the sensitivity and specificity for MM detection are compared between both assessments. To assess the concurrent validity, Windmill-task data are compared with W&T data using Spearman rank correlations (ρ) for 2 conditions: affected hand moving vs less affected hand moving. Sensitivity and specificity are compared by measuring the mean percentage of children being assessed inconsistently across both assessments. Results: Outcomes of both assessments correlated significantly (affected hand moving: ρ=.520; P=.005; less affected hand moving: ρ=.488; P=.009). However, many children displayed MMs on the Windmill-task, but not on the W&T (sensitivity: affected hand moving: 27.5%; less affected hand moving: 40.6%). Only 2 children displayed MMs on the W&T, but not on the Windmill-task (specificity: affected hand moving: 2.9%; less affected hand moving: 1.4%). Conclusions: The Windmill-task seems to be a valid tool to assess MMs in children with UCP and has an additional advantage of sensitivity to detect MMs.

AB - Objective: To introduce the Windmill-task, a new objective assessment tool to quantify the presence of mirror movements (MMs) in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), which are typically assessed with the observation-based Woods and Teuber scale (W&T). Design: Prospective, observational, cohort pilot study. Setting: Children's hospital. Participants: Prospective cohort of children (N=23) with UCP (age range, 6–15y, mean age, 10.5±2.7y). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The concurrent validity of the Windmill-task is assessed, and the sensitivity and specificity for MM detection are compared between both assessments. To assess the concurrent validity, Windmill-task data are compared with W&T data using Spearman rank correlations (ρ) for 2 conditions: affected hand moving vs less affected hand moving. Sensitivity and specificity are compared by measuring the mean percentage of children being assessed inconsistently across both assessments. Results: Outcomes of both assessments correlated significantly (affected hand moving: ρ=.520; P=.005; less affected hand moving: ρ=.488; P=.009). However, many children displayed MMs on the Windmill-task, but not on the W&T (sensitivity: affected hand moving: 27.5%; less affected hand moving: 40.6%). Only 2 children displayed MMs on the W&T, but not on the Windmill-task (specificity: affected hand moving: 2.9%; less affected hand moving: 1.4%). Conclusions: The Windmill-task seems to be a valid tool to assess MMs in children with UCP and has an additional advantage of sensitivity to detect MMs.

KW - Child

KW - Movement

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Upper extremity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047258625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.035

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.035

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 1547

EP - 1552

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 8

ER -