Wikis for group work

Encouraging transparency, benchmarking, and feedback

Amir Abdekhodaee, Anne-Marie Chase, Bella Ross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Technology is recognised as playing a part in the changing landscape in higher education; altering delivery modes and providing flexible opportunities for learning. Research into the use of wikis has shown that they provide many opportunities for student learning and the development of twenty-first century skills, however, there has been limited success in their use for collaboration. In this exploratory research, we report on a group wiki project in an engineering management unit at an Australian university. A wiki was introduced to replace the existing group report assessment to add transparency to the task. Each group had their own wiki and students were required to provide feedback to other group wikis which enabled transparency of students’ report development and group progress. The research aim was to investigate student perceptions of using a wiki. Students found the wikis helpful for benchmarking their activity against their peers. Students stated that peer feedback had improved their work; however, much of the feedback given by peers was too brief to be constructive, and provided too late to be useful in guiding their work. This paper will be of interest to academics interested in using wikis in their teaching to develop feedback, transparency, and benchmarking.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-31
Number of pages17
JournalAustralasian Journal of Educational Technology
Volume33
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Educational technology
  • Assessment
  • Wikis
  • Group work
  • Feedback

Cite this

@article{27ecd91a808549d1b0e25fdfa5e94cf1,
title = "Wikis for group work: Encouraging transparency, benchmarking, and feedback",
abstract = "Technology is recognised as playing a part in the changing landscape in higher education; altering delivery modes and providing flexible opportunities for learning. Research into the use of wikis has shown that they provide many opportunities for student learning and the development of twenty-first century skills, however, there has been limited success in their use for collaboration. In this exploratory research, we report on a group wiki project in an engineering management unit at an Australian university. A wiki was introduced to replace the existing group report assessment to add transparency to the task. Each group had their own wiki and students were required to provide feedback to other group wikis which enabled transparency of students’ report development and group progress. The research aim was to investigate student perceptions of using a wiki. Students found the wikis helpful for benchmarking their activity against their peers. Students stated that peer feedback had improved their work; however, much of the feedback given by peers was too brief to be constructive, and provided too late to be useful in guiding their work. This paper will be of interest to academics interested in using wikis in their teaching to develop feedback, transparency, and benchmarking.",
keywords = "Educational technology, Assessment, Wikis, Group work, Feedback",
author = "Amir Abdekhodaee and Anne-Marie Chase and Bella Ross",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "15--31",
journal = "Australasian Journal of Educational Technology",
issn = "1449-3098",
publisher = "Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education",
number = "5",

}

Wikis for group work : Encouraging transparency, benchmarking, and feedback. / Abdekhodaee, Amir; Chase, Anne-Marie; Ross, Bella.

In: Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2017, p. 15-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wikis for group work

T2 - Encouraging transparency, benchmarking, and feedback

AU - Abdekhodaee, Amir

AU - Chase, Anne-Marie

AU - Ross, Bella

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Technology is recognised as playing a part in the changing landscape in higher education; altering delivery modes and providing flexible opportunities for learning. Research into the use of wikis has shown that they provide many opportunities for student learning and the development of twenty-first century skills, however, there has been limited success in their use for collaboration. In this exploratory research, we report on a group wiki project in an engineering management unit at an Australian university. A wiki was introduced to replace the existing group report assessment to add transparency to the task. Each group had their own wiki and students were required to provide feedback to other group wikis which enabled transparency of students’ report development and group progress. The research aim was to investigate student perceptions of using a wiki. Students found the wikis helpful for benchmarking their activity against their peers. Students stated that peer feedback had improved their work; however, much of the feedback given by peers was too brief to be constructive, and provided too late to be useful in guiding their work. This paper will be of interest to academics interested in using wikis in their teaching to develop feedback, transparency, and benchmarking.

AB - Technology is recognised as playing a part in the changing landscape in higher education; altering delivery modes and providing flexible opportunities for learning. Research into the use of wikis has shown that they provide many opportunities for student learning and the development of twenty-first century skills, however, there has been limited success in their use for collaboration. In this exploratory research, we report on a group wiki project in an engineering management unit at an Australian university. A wiki was introduced to replace the existing group report assessment to add transparency to the task. Each group had their own wiki and students were required to provide feedback to other group wikis which enabled transparency of students’ report development and group progress. The research aim was to investigate student perceptions of using a wiki. Students found the wikis helpful for benchmarking their activity against their peers. Students stated that peer feedback had improved their work; however, much of the feedback given by peers was too brief to be constructive, and provided too late to be useful in guiding their work. This paper will be of interest to academics interested in using wikis in their teaching to develop feedback, transparency, and benchmarking.

KW - Educational technology

KW - Assessment

KW - Wikis

KW - Group work

KW - Feedback

UR - http://bit.ly/AJET-earlyrelease

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 15

EP - 31

JO - Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

JF - Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

SN - 1449-3098

IS - 5

ER -