Why do people fare evade? A global shift in fare evasion research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Fare evasion is a significant concern for most transit authorities. The traditional approach to fare compliance has focussed on modifying the physical control of ticketing or ticket inspection rates. Yet recently the perspective on fare evasion has begun to shift toward profiling the fare evader or understanding the customer motivations to fare evade. This paper uses a literature review method to document the characteristics of these three perspectives on fare evasion: the conventional transit system perspective, the customer profiling perspective and the customer motivations perspective. We find that the conventional transit system perspective, although straightforward to measure and control, has its limits particularly in “open” transit systems. The customer profiling perspective attempts to identify, based on demographics, which customers are more likely to fare evade. However this perspective has little use beyond profiling and is ethically questionable. The customer motivations perspective provides a richer understanding of how customers define fare evasion and what attitudes, social norms and circumstances motivates them to fare evade. Considering that between 20% and 40% of a city’s residents admit to fare evading at some point, understanding these complex motivations can help improve revenue compliance at a time when most governments heavily subsidise their transit systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)376-391
Number of pages16
JournalTransport Reviews
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2019

Keywords

  • Fare evasion
  • public transport
  • revenue compliance
  • transit

Cite this

@article{c0d6885ad3584fdba22d263a3ab8cc9e,
title = "Why do people fare evade? A global shift in fare evasion research",
abstract = "Fare evasion is a significant concern for most transit authorities. The traditional approach to fare compliance has focussed on modifying the physical control of ticketing or ticket inspection rates. Yet recently the perspective on fare evasion has begun to shift toward profiling the fare evader or understanding the customer motivations to fare evade. This paper uses a literature review method to document the characteristics of these three perspectives on fare evasion: the conventional transit system perspective, the customer profiling perspective and the customer motivations perspective. We find that the conventional transit system perspective, although straightforward to measure and control, has its limits particularly in “open” transit systems. The customer profiling perspective attempts to identify, based on demographics, which customers are more likely to fare evade. However this perspective has little use beyond profiling and is ethically questionable. The customer motivations perspective provides a richer understanding of how customers define fare evasion and what attitudes, social norms and circumstances motivates them to fare evade. Considering that between 20{\%} and 40{\%} of a city’s residents admit to fare evading at some point, understanding these complex motivations can help improve revenue compliance at a time when most governments heavily subsidise their transit systems.",
keywords = "Fare evasion, public transport, revenue compliance, transit",
author = "Alexa Delbosc and Graham Currie",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/01441647.2018.1482382",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "376--391",
journal = "Transport Reviews",
issn = "0144-1647",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Why do people fare evade? A global shift in fare evasion research. / Delbosc, Alexa; Currie, Graham.

In: Transport Reviews, Vol. 39, No. 3, 04.05.2019, p. 376-391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do people fare evade? A global shift in fare evasion research

AU - Delbosc, Alexa

AU - Currie, Graham

PY - 2019/5/4

Y1 - 2019/5/4

N2 - Fare evasion is a significant concern for most transit authorities. The traditional approach to fare compliance has focussed on modifying the physical control of ticketing or ticket inspection rates. Yet recently the perspective on fare evasion has begun to shift toward profiling the fare evader or understanding the customer motivations to fare evade. This paper uses a literature review method to document the characteristics of these three perspectives on fare evasion: the conventional transit system perspective, the customer profiling perspective and the customer motivations perspective. We find that the conventional transit system perspective, although straightforward to measure and control, has its limits particularly in “open” transit systems. The customer profiling perspective attempts to identify, based on demographics, which customers are more likely to fare evade. However this perspective has little use beyond profiling and is ethically questionable. The customer motivations perspective provides a richer understanding of how customers define fare evasion and what attitudes, social norms and circumstances motivates them to fare evade. Considering that between 20% and 40% of a city’s residents admit to fare evading at some point, understanding these complex motivations can help improve revenue compliance at a time when most governments heavily subsidise their transit systems.

AB - Fare evasion is a significant concern for most transit authorities. The traditional approach to fare compliance has focussed on modifying the physical control of ticketing or ticket inspection rates. Yet recently the perspective on fare evasion has begun to shift toward profiling the fare evader or understanding the customer motivations to fare evade. This paper uses a literature review method to document the characteristics of these three perspectives on fare evasion: the conventional transit system perspective, the customer profiling perspective and the customer motivations perspective. We find that the conventional transit system perspective, although straightforward to measure and control, has its limits particularly in “open” transit systems. The customer profiling perspective attempts to identify, based on demographics, which customers are more likely to fare evade. However this perspective has little use beyond profiling and is ethically questionable. The customer motivations perspective provides a richer understanding of how customers define fare evasion and what attitudes, social norms and circumstances motivates them to fare evade. Considering that between 20% and 40% of a city’s residents admit to fare evading at some point, understanding these complex motivations can help improve revenue compliance at a time when most governments heavily subsidise their transit systems.

KW - Fare evasion

KW - public transport

KW - revenue compliance

KW - transit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062673747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01441647.2018.1482382

DO - 10.1080/01441647.2018.1482382

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 376

EP - 391

JO - Transport Reviews

JF - Transport Reviews

SN - 0144-1647

IS - 3

ER -