Why didn’t Paris burn in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Several European cities experienced devastating fires in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and some burned repeatedly. Paris did not. Yet there, as elsewhere, the central quarters were crowded, and wood was widely used. People relied on naked flames for heating, cooking, and lighting and for most industrial processes. This article suggests that a combination of interconnected factors explains Paris’s good fortune and differentiated it from other cities. It enjoyed a climate that reduced the likelihood of bad fires and provided abundant water, assisted by a geology that also offered fire-resistant building materials. These factors helped its inhabitants fight fires with surprising success, even before the creation of a permanent fire service. The nature of the city’s economy also helped, because there were few concentrations of highly combustible products, and its various institutions of government collaborated to make both preventive measures and fire control more effective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-65
Number of pages31
JournalFrench Historical Studies
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Environmental history
  • Fire
  • Paris
  • Policing
  • Urban history

Cite this

@article{0dc8538fa4254cf58f65e33df5b40b89,
title = "Why didn’t Paris burn in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries?",
abstract = "Several European cities experienced devastating fires in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and some burned repeatedly. Paris did not. Yet there, as elsewhere, the central quarters were crowded, and wood was widely used. People relied on naked flames for heating, cooking, and lighting and for most industrial processes. This article suggests that a combination of interconnected factors explains Paris’s good fortune and differentiated it from other cities. It enjoyed a climate that reduced the likelihood of bad fires and provided abundant water, assisted by a geology that also offered fire-resistant building materials. These factors helped its inhabitants fight fires with surprising success, even before the creation of a permanent fire service. The nature of the city’s economy also helped, because there were few concentrations of highly combustible products, and its various institutions of government collaborated to make both preventive measures and fire control more effective.",
keywords = "Environmental history, Fire, Paris, Policing, Urban history",
author = "David Garrioch",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1215/00161071-7205197",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "35--65",
journal = "French Historical Studies",
issn = "0016-1071",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "1",

}

Why didn’t Paris burn in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries? / Garrioch, David.

In: French Historical Studies, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 35-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why didn’t Paris burn in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries?

AU - Garrioch, David

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Several European cities experienced devastating fires in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and some burned repeatedly. Paris did not. Yet there, as elsewhere, the central quarters were crowded, and wood was widely used. People relied on naked flames for heating, cooking, and lighting and for most industrial processes. This article suggests that a combination of interconnected factors explains Paris’s good fortune and differentiated it from other cities. It enjoyed a climate that reduced the likelihood of bad fires and provided abundant water, assisted by a geology that also offered fire-resistant building materials. These factors helped its inhabitants fight fires with surprising success, even before the creation of a permanent fire service. The nature of the city’s economy also helped, because there were few concentrations of highly combustible products, and its various institutions of government collaborated to make both preventive measures and fire control more effective.

AB - Several European cities experienced devastating fires in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and some burned repeatedly. Paris did not. Yet there, as elsewhere, the central quarters were crowded, and wood was widely used. People relied on naked flames for heating, cooking, and lighting and for most industrial processes. This article suggests that a combination of interconnected factors explains Paris’s good fortune and differentiated it from other cities. It enjoyed a climate that reduced the likelihood of bad fires and provided abundant water, assisted by a geology that also offered fire-resistant building materials. These factors helped its inhabitants fight fires with surprising success, even before the creation of a permanent fire service. The nature of the city’s economy also helped, because there were few concentrations of highly combustible products, and its various institutions of government collaborated to make both preventive measures and fire control more effective.

KW - Environmental history

KW - Fire

KW - Paris

KW - Policing

KW - Urban history

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061704272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1215/00161071-7205197

DO - 10.1215/00161071-7205197

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 35

EP - 65

JO - French Historical Studies

JF - French Historical Studies

SN - 0016-1071

IS - 1

ER -