Whose choice? Young people, career choices and reflexivity re-examined

Jacqueline Laughland-Booy, Margery Mayall, Zlatko Skrbis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Young people making future career choices are doing so in an environment that often highlights the benefits supposedly wrought by individualisation and reflexive choice. It is argued that those who demonstrate reflexivity in their decision-making would have an advantage in the negotiation of future risks. The authors of this article agree with theorists who note that career choices are still strongly influenced by a person s location in the class structure. However, unlike some writers who suggest youth from more privileged socio-economic backgrounds are more likely to evaluate risk and demonstrate reflexivity, the authors suggest the opposite. Interviews were conducted with young people aged 16-17 who are participating in an ongoing project designed to follow a cohort of young Australians from adolescence into later life. Our findings suggest that while a more privileged location may afford young people security from many potential risks and problems, this may in fact encourage a non-reflexive perspective and they may choose careers based on social norms rather than ability. Instead, we argue that it is young people from less privileged backgrounds who tend to demonstrate reflexivity in their career planning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)586 - 603
Number of pages18
JournalCurrent Sociology
Volume63
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

Laughland-Booy, Jacqueline ; Mayall, Margery ; Skrbis, Zlatko. / Whose choice? Young people, career choices and reflexivity re-examined. In: Current Sociology. 2015 ; Vol. 63, No. 4. pp. 586 - 603.
@article{328da16230a74162b9674720a54371d6,
title = "Whose choice? Young people, career choices and reflexivity re-examined",
abstract = "Young people making future career choices are doing so in an environment that often highlights the benefits supposedly wrought by individualisation and reflexive choice. It is argued that those who demonstrate reflexivity in their decision-making would have an advantage in the negotiation of future risks. The authors of this article agree with theorists who note that career choices are still strongly influenced by a person s location in the class structure. However, unlike some writers who suggest youth from more privileged socio-economic backgrounds are more likely to evaluate risk and demonstrate reflexivity, the authors suggest the opposite. Interviews were conducted with young people aged 16-17 who are participating in an ongoing project designed to follow a cohort of young Australians from adolescence into later life. Our findings suggest that while a more privileged location may afford young people security from many potential risks and problems, this may in fact encourage a non-reflexive perspective and they may choose careers based on social norms rather than ability. Instead, we argue that it is young people from less privileged backgrounds who tend to demonstrate reflexivity in their career planning.",
author = "Jacqueline Laughland-Booy and Margery Mayall and Zlatko Skrbis",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/0011392114540671",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "586 -- 603",
journal = "Current Sociology",
issn = "0011-3921",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Whose choice? Young people, career choices and reflexivity re-examined. / Laughland-Booy, Jacqueline; Mayall, Margery; Skrbis, Zlatko.

In: Current Sociology, Vol. 63, No. 4, 2015, p. 586 - 603.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whose choice? Young people, career choices and reflexivity re-examined

AU - Laughland-Booy, Jacqueline

AU - Mayall, Margery

AU - Skrbis, Zlatko

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Young people making future career choices are doing so in an environment that often highlights the benefits supposedly wrought by individualisation and reflexive choice. It is argued that those who demonstrate reflexivity in their decision-making would have an advantage in the negotiation of future risks. The authors of this article agree with theorists who note that career choices are still strongly influenced by a person s location in the class structure. However, unlike some writers who suggest youth from more privileged socio-economic backgrounds are more likely to evaluate risk and demonstrate reflexivity, the authors suggest the opposite. Interviews were conducted with young people aged 16-17 who are participating in an ongoing project designed to follow a cohort of young Australians from adolescence into later life. Our findings suggest that while a more privileged location may afford young people security from many potential risks and problems, this may in fact encourage a non-reflexive perspective and they may choose careers based on social norms rather than ability. Instead, we argue that it is young people from less privileged backgrounds who tend to demonstrate reflexivity in their career planning.

AB - Young people making future career choices are doing so in an environment that often highlights the benefits supposedly wrought by individualisation and reflexive choice. It is argued that those who demonstrate reflexivity in their decision-making would have an advantage in the negotiation of future risks. The authors of this article agree with theorists who note that career choices are still strongly influenced by a person s location in the class structure. However, unlike some writers who suggest youth from more privileged socio-economic backgrounds are more likely to evaluate risk and demonstrate reflexivity, the authors suggest the opposite. Interviews were conducted with young people aged 16-17 who are participating in an ongoing project designed to follow a cohort of young Australians from adolescence into later life. Our findings suggest that while a more privileged location may afford young people security from many potential risks and problems, this may in fact encourage a non-reflexive perspective and they may choose careers based on social norms rather than ability. Instead, we argue that it is young people from less privileged backgrounds who tend to demonstrate reflexivity in their career planning.

UR - http://csi.sagepub.com/content/63/4/586.full.pdf+html

U2 - 10.1177/0011392114540671

DO - 10.1177/0011392114540671

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 586

EP - 603

JO - Current Sociology

JF - Current Sociology

SN - 0011-3921

IS - 4

ER -