Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined

Eleonora Alabrese, Sascha O. Becker, Thiemo Fetzer, Dennis Novy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous analyses of the 2016 Brexit referendum used region-level data or small samples based on polling data. The former might be subject to ecological fallacy and the latter might suffer from small-sample bias. We use individual-level data on thousands of respondents in Understanding Society, the UK's largest household survey, which includes the EU referendum question. We find that voting Leave is associated with older age, white ethnicity, low educational attainment, infrequent use of smartphones and the internet, receiving benefits, adverse health and low life satisfaction. These results coincide with corresponding patterns at the aggregate level of voting areas. We therefore do not find evidence of ecological fallacy. In addition, we show that prediction accuracy is geographically heterogeneous across UK regions, with strongly pro-Leave and strongly pro-Remain areas easier to predict. We also show that among individuals with similar socio-economic characteristics, Labour supporters are more likely to support Remain while Conservative supporters are more likely to support Leave.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-150
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Political Economy
Volume56
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aggregation
  • Ecological fallacy
  • European Union
  • Populism
  • Referendum
  • UK

Cite this

Alabrese, Eleonora ; Becker, Sascha O. ; Fetzer, Thiemo ; Novy, Dennis. / Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined. In: European Journal of Political Economy. 2019 ; Vol. 56. pp. 132-150.
@article{7309e44048c441938b87ddc64aa77c12,
title = "Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined",
abstract = "Previous analyses of the 2016 Brexit referendum used region-level data or small samples based on polling data. The former might be subject to ecological fallacy and the latter might suffer from small-sample bias. We use individual-level data on thousands of respondents in Understanding Society, the UK's largest household survey, which includes the EU referendum question. We find that voting Leave is associated with older age, white ethnicity, low educational attainment, infrequent use of smartphones and the internet, receiving benefits, adverse health and low life satisfaction. These results coincide with corresponding patterns at the aggregate level of voting areas. We therefore do not find evidence of ecological fallacy. In addition, we show that prediction accuracy is geographically heterogeneous across UK regions, with strongly pro-Leave and strongly pro-Remain areas easier to predict. We also show that among individuals with similar socio-economic characteristics, Labour supporters are more likely to support Remain while Conservative supporters are more likely to support Leave.",
keywords = "Aggregation, Ecological fallacy, European Union, Populism, Referendum, UK",
author = "Eleonora Alabrese and Becker, {Sascha O.} and Thiemo Fetzer and Dennis Novy",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "132--150",
journal = "European Journal of Political Economy",
issn = "0176-2680",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined. / Alabrese, Eleonora; Becker, Sascha O.; Fetzer, Thiemo; Novy, Dennis.

In: European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 56, 01.2019, p. 132-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined

AU - Alabrese, Eleonora

AU - Becker, Sascha O.

AU - Fetzer, Thiemo

AU - Novy, Dennis

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - Previous analyses of the 2016 Brexit referendum used region-level data or small samples based on polling data. The former might be subject to ecological fallacy and the latter might suffer from small-sample bias. We use individual-level data on thousands of respondents in Understanding Society, the UK's largest household survey, which includes the EU referendum question. We find that voting Leave is associated with older age, white ethnicity, low educational attainment, infrequent use of smartphones and the internet, receiving benefits, adverse health and low life satisfaction. These results coincide with corresponding patterns at the aggregate level of voting areas. We therefore do not find evidence of ecological fallacy. In addition, we show that prediction accuracy is geographically heterogeneous across UK regions, with strongly pro-Leave and strongly pro-Remain areas easier to predict. We also show that among individuals with similar socio-economic characteristics, Labour supporters are more likely to support Remain while Conservative supporters are more likely to support Leave.

AB - Previous analyses of the 2016 Brexit referendum used region-level data or small samples based on polling data. The former might be subject to ecological fallacy and the latter might suffer from small-sample bias. We use individual-level data on thousands of respondents in Understanding Society, the UK's largest household survey, which includes the EU referendum question. We find that voting Leave is associated with older age, white ethnicity, low educational attainment, infrequent use of smartphones and the internet, receiving benefits, adverse health and low life satisfaction. These results coincide with corresponding patterns at the aggregate level of voting areas. We therefore do not find evidence of ecological fallacy. In addition, we show that prediction accuracy is geographically heterogeneous across UK regions, with strongly pro-Leave and strongly pro-Remain areas easier to predict. We also show that among individuals with similar socio-economic characteristics, Labour supporters are more likely to support Remain while Conservative supporters are more likely to support Leave.

KW - Aggregation

KW - Ecological fallacy

KW - European Union

KW - Populism

KW - Referendum

KW - UK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053015679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 132

EP - 150

JO - European Journal of Political Economy

JF - European Journal of Political Economy

SN - 0176-2680

ER -