TY - JOUR
T1 - Who to Refer for Speech Therapy at 4 Years of Age Versus Who to “Watch and Wait”?
AU - Morgan, Angela
AU - Ttofari Eecen, Kyriaki
AU - Pezic, Angela
AU - Brommeyer, Katherine
AU - Mei, Cristina
AU - Eadie, Patricia
AU - Reilly, Sheena
AU - Dodd, Barbara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Objective To examine predictors of speech disorder resolution versus persistence at age 7 years in children with speech errors at age 4 years. Study design Participants were drawn from a longitudinal, community cohort. Assessment at age 4 years (N = 1494) identified children with speech errors. Reassessment at age 7 years allowed categorization into resolved or persistent categories. Logistic regression examined predictors of speech outcome, including family history, sex, socioeconomic status, nonverbal intelligence, and speech error type (delay vs disorder). Results At age 7 years, persistent errors were seen in over 40% of children who had errors at age 4 years. Speech symptomatology was the only significant predictor of outcome (P =.02). Children with disordered errors at age 4 years were twice as likely to have poor speech outcomes at age 7 years compared with those with delayed errors. Conclusions Children with speech delay at age 4 years seem more likely to resolve, and this might justify a “watch and wait” approach. In contrast, those with speech disorder at age 4 years appear to be at greater risk for persistent difficulties, and could be prioritized for therapy to offset long-term impacts.
AB - Objective To examine predictors of speech disorder resolution versus persistence at age 7 years in children with speech errors at age 4 years. Study design Participants were drawn from a longitudinal, community cohort. Assessment at age 4 years (N = 1494) identified children with speech errors. Reassessment at age 7 years allowed categorization into resolved or persistent categories. Logistic regression examined predictors of speech outcome, including family history, sex, socioeconomic status, nonverbal intelligence, and speech error type (delay vs disorder). Results At age 7 years, persistent errors were seen in over 40% of children who had errors at age 4 years. Speech symptomatology was the only significant predictor of outcome (P =.02). Children with disordered errors at age 4 years were twice as likely to have poor speech outcomes at age 7 years compared with those with delayed errors. Conclusions Children with speech delay at age 4 years seem more likely to resolve, and this might justify a “watch and wait” approach. In contrast, those with speech disorder at age 4 years appear to be at greater risk for persistent difficulties, and could be prioritized for therapy to offset long-term impacts.
KW - articulation
KW - recover
KW - resolve
KW - speech disorder
KW - speech therapy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85016050824
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.02.059
DO - 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.02.059
M3 - Article
C2 - 28343655
AN - SCOPUS:85016050824
SN - 0022-3476
VL - 185
SP - 200-204.e1
JO - Journal of Pediatrics
JF - Journal of Pediatrics
ER -