Who can you trust? Credibility assessment in online health forums

Reeva Lederman, Hanmei Fan, Stephen Patrick Smith, Shanton Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

As the cost of health care rises governments everywhere are examining how on-line services can replace or augment face-to-face services. Consequently, many health bodies are establishing on-line health forums where patients can share ideas with, or solicit information from, both other patients and health professionals. In the wake of this trend, many on-line forums have arisen which do not have the imprimatur of official government services but are run and managed by private individuals sharing experiences outside of the patient-clinician channel. This phenomenon creates risks and challenges for users who need to evaluate the credibility of unknown and often anonymous contributors to these forums. This paper examines how users assess the credibility of the information in these forums. Five criteria were discovered in the first stage of the work. We then quantitatively tested the relationship between those criteria based on two types of information. Our analysis shows that different criteria are used by participants in online health forums for scientific information and experiential information. We used these novel findings to develop a model for how information credibility is assessed in online health forums. These findings provide important lessons for health promotion bodies considering how to encourage the sharing of valuable health information on-line as well as guidelines for improved tools for health self-management.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13 - 25
Number of pages13
JournalHealth Policy and Technology
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

Lederman, Reeva ; Fan, Hanmei ; Smith, Stephen Patrick ; Chang, Shanton. / Who can you trust? Credibility assessment in online health forums. In: Health Policy and Technology. 2014 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 13 - 25.
@article{8145c2130343459b8ccf02e97bdc63fa,
title = "Who can you trust? Credibility assessment in online health forums",
abstract = "As the cost of health care rises governments everywhere are examining how on-line services can replace or augment face-to-face services. Consequently, many health bodies are establishing on-line health forums where patients can share ideas with, or solicit information from, both other patients and health professionals. In the wake of this trend, many on-line forums have arisen which do not have the imprimatur of official government services but are run and managed by private individuals sharing experiences outside of the patient-clinician channel. This phenomenon creates risks and challenges for users who need to evaluate the credibility of unknown and often anonymous contributors to these forums. This paper examines how users assess the credibility of the information in these forums. Five criteria were discovered in the first stage of the work. We then quantitatively tested the relationship between those criteria based on two types of information. Our analysis shows that different criteria are used by participants in online health forums for scientific information and experiential information. We used these novel findings to develop a model for how information credibility is assessed in online health forums. These findings provide important lessons for health promotion bodies considering how to encourage the sharing of valuable health information on-line as well as guidelines for improved tools for health self-management.",
author = "Reeva Lederman and Hanmei Fan and Smith, {Stephen Patrick} and Shanton Chang",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.11.003",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "13 -- 25",
journal = "Health Policy and Technology",
issn = "2211-8837",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Who can you trust? Credibility assessment in online health forums. / Lederman, Reeva; Fan, Hanmei; Smith, Stephen Patrick; Chang, Shanton.

In: Health Policy and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2014, p. 13 - 25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who can you trust? Credibility assessment in online health forums

AU - Lederman, Reeva

AU - Fan, Hanmei

AU - Smith, Stephen Patrick

AU - Chang, Shanton

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - As the cost of health care rises governments everywhere are examining how on-line services can replace or augment face-to-face services. Consequently, many health bodies are establishing on-line health forums where patients can share ideas with, or solicit information from, both other patients and health professionals. In the wake of this trend, many on-line forums have arisen which do not have the imprimatur of official government services but are run and managed by private individuals sharing experiences outside of the patient-clinician channel. This phenomenon creates risks and challenges for users who need to evaluate the credibility of unknown and often anonymous contributors to these forums. This paper examines how users assess the credibility of the information in these forums. Five criteria were discovered in the first stage of the work. We then quantitatively tested the relationship between those criteria based on two types of information. Our analysis shows that different criteria are used by participants in online health forums for scientific information and experiential information. We used these novel findings to develop a model for how information credibility is assessed in online health forums. These findings provide important lessons for health promotion bodies considering how to encourage the sharing of valuable health information on-line as well as guidelines for improved tools for health self-management.

AB - As the cost of health care rises governments everywhere are examining how on-line services can replace or augment face-to-face services. Consequently, many health bodies are establishing on-line health forums where patients can share ideas with, or solicit information from, both other patients and health professionals. In the wake of this trend, many on-line forums have arisen which do not have the imprimatur of official government services but are run and managed by private individuals sharing experiences outside of the patient-clinician channel. This phenomenon creates risks and challenges for users who need to evaluate the credibility of unknown and often anonymous contributors to these forums. This paper examines how users assess the credibility of the information in these forums. Five criteria were discovered in the first stage of the work. We then quantitatively tested the relationship between those criteria based on two types of information. Our analysis shows that different criteria are used by participants in online health forums for scientific information and experiential information. We used these novel findings to develop a model for how information credibility is assessed in online health forums. These findings provide important lessons for health promotion bodies considering how to encourage the sharing of valuable health information on-line as well as guidelines for improved tools for health self-management.

U2 - 10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 13

EP - 25

JO - Health Policy and Technology

JF - Health Policy and Technology

SN - 2211-8837

IS - 1

ER -