Which spring is the best? Comparison of methods for virtual stenting

Katerina Spranger, Yiannis Ventikos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology for modeling the deployment of implantable devices used in minimally invasive vascular interventions. Motivated by the clinical need to perform preinterventional rehearsals of a stent deployment, we have developed methods enabling virtual device placement inside arteries, under the constraint of real-time application. This requirement of rapid execution narrowed down the search for a suitable method to the concept of a dynamic mesh. Inspired by the idea of a mesh of springs, we have found a novel way to apply it to stent modeling. The experiments conducted in this paper investigate properties of the stent models based on three different spring types: lineal, semitorsional, and torsional springs. Furthermore, this paper compares the results of various deployment scenarios for two different classes of devices: a stent graft and a flow diverter. The presented results can be of a high-potential clinical value, enabling the predictive evaluation of the outcome of a stent deployment treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6767090
Pages (from-to)1998-2010
Number of pages13
JournalIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Volume61
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Flow diverter
  • modeling
  • stent
  • virtual stenting

Cite this