Where is the evidence that rural exposure increases uptake of rural medical practice?

Geethanjali Piyawadani Ranmuthugala, John Stirling Humphreys, Barbara Solarsh, Lucie Walters, Paul S Worley, John Wakerman, James Anthony Dunbar, Geoffrey Clive Solarsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Australian Government initiatives to address medical workforce shortages in rural Australia include increasing the intake of students of rural background and increasing exposure to rural medicine during training. Rural-orientated medical training programs in the USA that selectively admit students from rural backgrounds and who intend to practise as family practitioners have demonstrated success in increasing uptake of practice in rural/underserved areas. However, in examining the specific contribution of rural exposure towards increasing uptake of rural practice, the evidence is inconclusive, largely due to the failure to adjust for these critical independent predictors of rural practice. This paper identifies this evidence gap, examines the concept of rural exposure, and highlights the need to identify which aspects of rural exposure contribute to a positive attitude towards rural practice, thereby influencing students to return to rural areas. The cost of rural exposure through student placements is not insignificant, and there is a need to identify which aspects are most effective in increasing the uptake of rural practice, thereby helping to address the medical workforce shortage experienced in rural Australia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285 - 288
Number of pages4
JournalAustralian Journal of Rural Health
Volume15
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Cite this