TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘Where do I place my chair?’
T2 - Considerations of chair placement in consultation observation
AU - Willems, Julie
N1 - Funding Information:
Julie Willems SRN, BA, MEd (Hons), PhD, Manager Supervisor CPD and Senior Research Fellow, Eastern Victoria GP Training, Vic (2018–21); Teaching Associate and Research Fellow, Monash Rural Health, Monash University, Vic Competing interests: None. Funding: The original workplace-based assessment (WBA) Education Research Grant (ERG) (2018–2019) was supported by The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners as a Special Education Research Grant with funding from the Australian Government under the Australian General Practice Training program. This article is a secondary analysis of one as yet unpublished component of this large national project, focusing on consultation observation (direct observation). Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed. Correspondence to: [email protected]
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Background and objective In workplace-based training and assessment of registrars and supervised doctors, the influence of contextual factors such as consultation room layout, including placement of chairs, may be overlooked. The aim was to identify the room's seating arrangements in consultation observation between the assessor, the assessed and the patient. Methods Qualitative research was undertaken to explore the perceptions of consultation observation as a tool in workplace-based training and assessment through semi.structured one-on-one interviews. Thematic analysis was employed to analyse the data; secondary data analysis highlighted the use of metaphors to describe seating arrangements. Results Chair placement tended to be discussed by participants in terms of triangles. equilateral, isosceles and scalene. Other metaphors included curved lines, compasses or clock faces. Notions of agency in seating positions and constraints by room layout were also identified. Discussion There is a tension between the physical layout and structure of the consultation room, seating preferences of the observer and the agency of registrar as the observed.
AB - Background and objective In workplace-based training and assessment of registrars and supervised doctors, the influence of contextual factors such as consultation room layout, including placement of chairs, may be overlooked. The aim was to identify the room's seating arrangements in consultation observation between the assessor, the assessed and the patient. Methods Qualitative research was undertaken to explore the perceptions of consultation observation as a tool in workplace-based training and assessment through semi.structured one-on-one interviews. Thematic analysis was employed to analyse the data; secondary data analysis highlighted the use of metaphors to describe seating arrangements. Results Chair placement tended to be discussed by participants in terms of triangles. equilateral, isosceles and scalene. Other metaphors included curved lines, compasses or clock faces. Notions of agency in seating positions and constraints by room layout were also identified. Discussion There is a tension between the physical layout and structure of the consultation room, seating preferences of the observer and the agency of registrar as the observed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129781909&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.31128/AJGP-04-21-5950
DO - 10.31128/AJGP-04-21-5950
M3 - Article
C2 - 35491453
AN - SCOPUS:85129781909
SN - 2208-794X
VL - 51
SP - 304
EP - 309
JO - Australian Journal of General Practice
JF - Australian Journal of General Practice
IS - 5
ER -