When Journalists Go “Below the Line”: Comment Spaces at The Guardian (2006–2017)

Scott Wright, Daniel Jackson, Todd Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on a longitudinal research design (2006–2017), this article analyses how Guardian journalists engage in “below the line” comment spaces; what factors shape this engagement; and how this has evolved over time. The article combines a large-scale quantitative analysis of the total number of comments made (n = 110,263,661) and a manual content analysis of all comments made by 26 journalists (n = 5448) and their broader writing practices with 18 semi-structured interviews conducted in two phases (13 in 2012 and 5 repeated in 2017–18). The results show that there is considerable interest in comment spaces amongst readers, with exponential growth in user commenting. Furthermore, there has been significant engagement below the line by some Guardian journalists, and this is often in the form of direct and sustained reciprocity. Journalist commenting has waned in recent years due to difficulties coping with the volume of comments; changes in editorial emphasis; concerns over incivility and abuse; and a decrease in perceived journalistic benefits of commenting, alongside the rise in importance of Twitter. When journalists comment, they do so in a variety of ways and their comments are often substantive, significantly adding to the story by, for example, defending and explaining their journalism practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-126
Number of pages20
JournalJournalism Studies
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Comment fields
  • content analysis
  • journalism practice
  • online newspapers
  • reader comments
  • user-generated content

Cite this

Wright, Scott ; Jackson, Daniel ; Graham, Todd. / When Journalists Go “Below the Line” : Comment Spaces at The Guardian (2006–2017). In: Journalism Studies. 2020 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 107-126.
@article{7a71413a815645bfaf9744e71ba378c7,
title = "When Journalists Go “Below the Line”: Comment Spaces at The Guardian (2006–2017)",
abstract = "Based on a longitudinal research design (2006–2017), this article analyses how Guardian journalists engage in “below the line” comment spaces; what factors shape this engagement; and how this has evolved over time. The article combines a large-scale quantitative analysis of the total number of comments made (n = 110,263,661) and a manual content analysis of all comments made by 26 journalists (n = 5448) and their broader writing practices with 18 semi-structured interviews conducted in two phases (13 in 2012 and 5 repeated in 2017–18). The results show that there is considerable interest in comment spaces amongst readers, with exponential growth in user commenting. Furthermore, there has been significant engagement below the line by some Guardian journalists, and this is often in the form of direct and sustained reciprocity. Journalist commenting has waned in recent years due to difficulties coping with the volume of comments; changes in editorial emphasis; concerns over incivility and abuse; and a decrease in perceived journalistic benefits of commenting, alongside the rise in importance of Twitter. When journalists comment, they do so in a variety of ways and their comments are often substantive, significantly adding to the story by, for example, defending and explaining their journalism practice.",
keywords = "Comment fields, content analysis, journalism practice, online newspapers, reader comments, user-generated content",
author = "Scott Wright and Daniel Jackson and Todd Graham",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/1461670X.2019.1632733",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "107--126",
journal = "Journalism Studies",
issn = "1461-670X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

When Journalists Go “Below the Line” : Comment Spaces at The Guardian (2006–2017). / Wright, Scott; Jackson, Daniel; Graham, Todd.

In: Journalism Studies, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2020, p. 107-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - When Journalists Go “Below the Line”

T2 - Comment Spaces at The Guardian (2006–2017)

AU - Wright, Scott

AU - Jackson, Daniel

AU - Graham, Todd

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Based on a longitudinal research design (2006–2017), this article analyses how Guardian journalists engage in “below the line” comment spaces; what factors shape this engagement; and how this has evolved over time. The article combines a large-scale quantitative analysis of the total number of comments made (n = 110,263,661) and a manual content analysis of all comments made by 26 journalists (n = 5448) and their broader writing practices with 18 semi-structured interviews conducted in two phases (13 in 2012 and 5 repeated in 2017–18). The results show that there is considerable interest in comment spaces amongst readers, with exponential growth in user commenting. Furthermore, there has been significant engagement below the line by some Guardian journalists, and this is often in the form of direct and sustained reciprocity. Journalist commenting has waned in recent years due to difficulties coping with the volume of comments; changes in editorial emphasis; concerns over incivility and abuse; and a decrease in perceived journalistic benefits of commenting, alongside the rise in importance of Twitter. When journalists comment, they do so in a variety of ways and their comments are often substantive, significantly adding to the story by, for example, defending and explaining their journalism practice.

AB - Based on a longitudinal research design (2006–2017), this article analyses how Guardian journalists engage in “below the line” comment spaces; what factors shape this engagement; and how this has evolved over time. The article combines a large-scale quantitative analysis of the total number of comments made (n = 110,263,661) and a manual content analysis of all comments made by 26 journalists (n = 5448) and their broader writing practices with 18 semi-structured interviews conducted in two phases (13 in 2012 and 5 repeated in 2017–18). The results show that there is considerable interest in comment spaces amongst readers, with exponential growth in user commenting. Furthermore, there has been significant engagement below the line by some Guardian journalists, and this is often in the form of direct and sustained reciprocity. Journalist commenting has waned in recent years due to difficulties coping with the volume of comments; changes in editorial emphasis; concerns over incivility and abuse; and a decrease in perceived journalistic benefits of commenting, alongside the rise in importance of Twitter. When journalists comment, they do so in a variety of ways and their comments are often substantive, significantly adding to the story by, for example, defending and explaining their journalism practice.

KW - Comment fields

KW - content analysis

KW - journalism practice

KW - online newspapers

KW - reader comments

KW - user-generated content

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068066715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1461670X.2019.1632733

DO - 10.1080/1461670X.2019.1632733

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068066715

VL - 21

SP - 107

EP - 126

JO - Journalism Studies

JF - Journalism Studies

SN - 1461-670X

IS - 1

ER -