When Fair Is Not Equal: Compassion and Politeness Predict Allocations of Wealth Under Different Norms of Equity and Need

Kun Zhao, Eamonn Ferguson, Luke D. Smillie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Growing evidence has highlighted the importance of social norms in promoting prosocial behaviors in economic games. Specifically, individual differences in norm adherence—captured by the politeness aspect of Big Five agreeableness—have been found to predict fair allocations of wealth to one’s partner in the dictator game. Yet, most studies have used neutrally framed paradigms, where players may default to norms of equality in the absence of contextual cues. In this study (N = 707), we examined prosocial personality traits and dictator allocations under salient real-world norms of equity and need. Extending on the previous research, we found that—in addition to politeness—the compassion aspect of agreeableness predicted greater allocations of wealth when they were embedded in real-world norms. These results represent an important step in understanding the real-world implications of laboratory-based research, demonstrating the importance of both normative context and prosocial traits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)847-857
Number of pages11
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume8
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • agreeableness
  • compassion
  • dictator game
  • politeness
  • social norms

Cite this