What to assess to model the transport impacts of urban growth? A Delphi approach to examine the space-time suitability of transport indicators

Sajida Perveen, Md Kamruzzaman, Tan Yigitcanlar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Selection of right transport impact indicators of urban growth is challenging because the impacts vary both geographically and temporally. For example, congestion might be a problem in innercity areas in a short-term but might not be detectable in a regional context event in the long-run.
This paper contributes to address this challenge. First, the study systematically selects 23 transport impact indicators through a review of 62 indicators identified from the literature. Second, it evaluates and classifies their suitability in terms of space–time dyads through a two-round of Delphi survey involving 29 international experts. The experts reached a consensus that 12 (52%) indicators
are suitable in various space–time dyadic combinations. Only “travel time” was identified as a suitable indicator for all three spatial (local, city, region) and two temporal (short-, long-term) scales. The findings serve as a guide for decision makers, transport modelers and planners to adopt indicators according to their scale of operation, and thus simplify the daunting task of suitable indicator selection process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Sustainable Transportation
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

@article{37a74a5f404d45c68f073d48ebaadfa2,
title = "What to assess to model the transport impacts of urban growth? A Delphi approach to examine the space-time suitability of transport indicators",
abstract = "Selection of right transport impact indicators of urban growth is challenging because the impacts vary both geographically and temporally. For example, congestion might be a problem in innercity areas in a short-term but might not be detectable in a regional context event in the long-run.This paper contributes to address this challenge. First, the study systematically selects 23 transport impact indicators through a review of 62 indicators identified from the literature. Second, it evaluates and classifies their suitability in terms of space–time dyads through a two-round of Delphi survey involving 29 international experts. The experts reached a consensus that 12 (52{\%}) indicatorsare suitable in various space–time dyadic combinations. Only “travel time” was identified as a suitable indicator for all three spatial (local, city, region) and two temporal (short-, long-term) scales. The findings serve as a guide for decision makers, transport modelers and planners to adopt indicators according to their scale of operation, and thus simplify the daunting task of suitable indicator selection process.",
author = "Sajida Perveen and Md Kamruzzaman and Tan Yigitcanlar",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/15568318.2018.1491077",
language = "English",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "International Journal of Sustainable Transportation",
issn = "1556-8318",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What to assess to model the transport impacts of urban growth? A Delphi approach to examine the space-time suitability of transport indicators

AU - Perveen, Sajida

AU - Kamruzzaman, Md

AU - Yigitcanlar, Tan

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Selection of right transport impact indicators of urban growth is challenging because the impacts vary both geographically and temporally. For example, congestion might be a problem in innercity areas in a short-term but might not be detectable in a regional context event in the long-run.This paper contributes to address this challenge. First, the study systematically selects 23 transport impact indicators through a review of 62 indicators identified from the literature. Second, it evaluates and classifies their suitability in terms of space–time dyads through a two-round of Delphi survey involving 29 international experts. The experts reached a consensus that 12 (52%) indicatorsare suitable in various space–time dyadic combinations. Only “travel time” was identified as a suitable indicator for all three spatial (local, city, region) and two temporal (short-, long-term) scales. The findings serve as a guide for decision makers, transport modelers and planners to adopt indicators according to their scale of operation, and thus simplify the daunting task of suitable indicator selection process.

AB - Selection of right transport impact indicators of urban growth is challenging because the impacts vary both geographically and temporally. For example, congestion might be a problem in innercity areas in a short-term but might not be detectable in a regional context event in the long-run.This paper contributes to address this challenge. First, the study systematically selects 23 transport impact indicators through a review of 62 indicators identified from the literature. Second, it evaluates and classifies their suitability in terms of space–time dyads through a two-round of Delphi survey involving 29 international experts. The experts reached a consensus that 12 (52%) indicatorsare suitable in various space–time dyadic combinations. Only “travel time” was identified as a suitable indicator for all three spatial (local, city, region) and two temporal (short-, long-term) scales. The findings serve as a guide for decision makers, transport modelers and planners to adopt indicators according to their scale of operation, and thus simplify the daunting task of suitable indicator selection process.

U2 - 10.1080/15568318.2018.1491077

DO - 10.1080/15568318.2018.1491077

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - International Journal of Sustainable Transportation

JF - International Journal of Sustainable Transportation

SN - 1556-8318

ER -