What the Australian public knows about the High Court

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Existing studies for the United States examine the extent to which the public is knowledgeable about US courts, arguing that knowledge of the courts is linked to public support for their role. We know little, though, about the Australian public’s awareness of the High Court of Australia. We report the results of a survey of a representative sample of the Australian adult population, administered in November 2017. We find that few Australians know the names of the Justices, the number of Justices on the Court, how the Justices are appointed or for how long they serve. Awareness of recent cases decided by the Court is mixed. We find that age and education are better predictors of awareness levels than is gender. Our findings are important because in the absence of awareness of the High Court, the potential exists for the public to see the Court as having a more overt political role than it has, which may lower esteem for the Court. The potential for this to occur is exacerbated if, and when, politicians attempt to drag the High Court into the political fray, by attributing political motives to it that it does not have.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-63
Number of pages33
JournalFederal Law Review
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Cite this

@article{e9fefa0856af414bae4d799915758940,
title = "What the Australian public knows about the High Court",
abstract = "Existing studies for the United States examine the extent to which the public is knowledgeable about US courts, arguing that knowledge of the courts is linked to public support for their role. We know little, though, about the Australian public’s awareness of the High Court of Australia. We report the results of a survey of a representative sample of the Australian adult population, administered in November 2017. We find that few Australians know the names of the Justices, the number of Justices on the Court, how the Justices are appointed or for how long they serve. Awareness of recent cases decided by the Court is mixed. We find that age and education are better predictors of awareness levels than is gender. Our findings are important because in the absence of awareness of the High Court, the potential exists for the public to see the Court as having a more overt political role than it has, which may lower esteem for the Court. The potential for this to occur is exacerbated if, and when, politicians attempt to drag the High Court into the political fray, by attributing political motives to it that it does not have.",
author = "Ingrid Nielsen and Russell Smyth",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0067205X18816238",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "31--63",
journal = "Federal Law Review",
issn = "0067-205X",
number = "1",

}

What the Australian public knows about the High Court. / Nielsen, Ingrid; Smyth, Russell.

In: Federal Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 1, 03.2019, p. 31-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What the Australian public knows about the High Court

AU - Nielsen, Ingrid

AU - Smyth, Russell

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Existing studies for the United States examine the extent to which the public is knowledgeable about US courts, arguing that knowledge of the courts is linked to public support for their role. We know little, though, about the Australian public’s awareness of the High Court of Australia. We report the results of a survey of a representative sample of the Australian adult population, administered in November 2017. We find that few Australians know the names of the Justices, the number of Justices on the Court, how the Justices are appointed or for how long they serve. Awareness of recent cases decided by the Court is mixed. We find that age and education are better predictors of awareness levels than is gender. Our findings are important because in the absence of awareness of the High Court, the potential exists for the public to see the Court as having a more overt political role than it has, which may lower esteem for the Court. The potential for this to occur is exacerbated if, and when, politicians attempt to drag the High Court into the political fray, by attributing political motives to it that it does not have.

AB - Existing studies for the United States examine the extent to which the public is knowledgeable about US courts, arguing that knowledge of the courts is linked to public support for their role. We know little, though, about the Australian public’s awareness of the High Court of Australia. We report the results of a survey of a representative sample of the Australian adult population, administered in November 2017. We find that few Australians know the names of the Justices, the number of Justices on the Court, how the Justices are appointed or for how long they serve. Awareness of recent cases decided by the Court is mixed. We find that age and education are better predictors of awareness levels than is gender. Our findings are important because in the absence of awareness of the High Court, the potential exists for the public to see the Court as having a more overt political role than it has, which may lower esteem for the Court. The potential for this to occur is exacerbated if, and when, politicians attempt to drag the High Court into the political fray, by attributing political motives to it that it does not have.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061574120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0067205X18816238

DO - 10.1177/0067205X18816238

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 31

EP - 63

JO - Federal Law Review

JF - Federal Law Review

SN - 0067-205X

IS - 1

ER -