What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service

William Shearer, Stuart Duncan Marshall, Michael D Buist, Monica A Finnigan, Simon Kitto, Tonina Hore, Tamica Sturgess, Stuart J Wilson, Wayne Ramsay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

To explore the causes of failure to activate the rapid response system (RRS). The organisation has a recognised incidence of staff failing to act when confronted with a deteriorating patient and leading to adverse outcomes. Design A multi-method study using the following: a point prevalence survey to determine the incidence of abnormal simple bedside observations and activation of the rapid response team by clinical staff; a prospective audit of all patients experiencing a cardiac arrest, unplanned intensive care unit admission or death over an 8-week period; structured interviews of staff to explore cognitive and sociocultural barriers to activating the RRS. Setting Southern Health is a comprehensive healthcare network with 570 adult in-patient beds across four metropolitan teaching hospitals in the south-eastern sector of Melbourne. Measurements Frequency of physiological instability and outcomes within the in-patient hospital population. Qualitative data from staff interviews were thematically coded. Results The incidence of physiological instability in the acute adult population was 4.04 . Nearly half of these patients (42 ) did not receive an appropriate clinical response from the staff, despite most (69.2 ) recognising their patient met physiological criteria for activating the RRS, and being `quite?, or `very? concerned about their patient (75.8 ). Structured interviews with 91 staff members identified predominantly sociocultural reasons for failure to activate the RRS. Conclusions Despite an organisational commitment to the RRS, clinical staff act on local cultural rules within the clinical environment that are usually not explicit. Better understanding of these informal rules may lead to more appropriate activation of the RRS.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)569 - 575
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ: British Medical Journal
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this

@article{11f7407c11c942cbb3fe6917fc33737c,
title = "What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service",
abstract = "To explore the causes of failure to activate the rapid response system (RRS). The organisation has a recognised incidence of staff failing to act when confronted with a deteriorating patient and leading to adverse outcomes. Design A multi-method study using the following: a point prevalence survey to determine the incidence of abnormal simple bedside observations and activation of the rapid response team by clinical staff; a prospective audit of all patients experiencing a cardiac arrest, unplanned intensive care unit admission or death over an 8-week period; structured interviews of staff to explore cognitive and sociocultural barriers to activating the RRS. Setting Southern Health is a comprehensive healthcare network with 570 adult in-patient beds across four metropolitan teaching hospitals in the south-eastern sector of Melbourne. Measurements Frequency of physiological instability and outcomes within the in-patient hospital population. Qualitative data from staff interviews were thematically coded. Results The incidence of physiological instability in the acute adult population was 4.04 . Nearly half of these patients (42 ) did not receive an appropriate clinical response from the staff, despite most (69.2 ) recognising their patient met physiological criteria for activating the RRS, and being `quite?, or `very? concerned about their patient (75.8 ). Structured interviews with 91 staff members identified predominantly sociocultural reasons for failure to activate the RRS. Conclusions Despite an organisational commitment to the RRS, clinical staff act on local cultural rules within the clinical environment that are usually not explicit. Better understanding of these informal rules may lead to more appropriate activation of the RRS.",
author = "William Shearer and Marshall, {Stuart Duncan} and Buist, {Michael D} and Finnigan, {Monica A} and Simon Kitto and Tonina Hore and Tamica Sturgess and Wilson, {Stuart J} and Wayne Ramsay",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000692",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "569 -- 575",
journal = "BMJ: British Medical Journal",
issn = "0959-535X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service. / Shearer, William; Marshall, Stuart Duncan; Buist, Michael D; Finnigan, Monica A; Kitto, Simon; Hore, Tonina; Sturgess, Tamica; Wilson, Stuart J; Ramsay, Wayne.

In: BMJ: British Medical Journal, Vol. 21, No. 7, 2012, p. 569 - 575.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service

AU - Shearer, William

AU - Marshall, Stuart Duncan

AU - Buist, Michael D

AU - Finnigan, Monica A

AU - Kitto, Simon

AU - Hore, Tonina

AU - Sturgess, Tamica

AU - Wilson, Stuart J

AU - Ramsay, Wayne

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - To explore the causes of failure to activate the rapid response system (RRS). The organisation has a recognised incidence of staff failing to act when confronted with a deteriorating patient and leading to adverse outcomes. Design A multi-method study using the following: a point prevalence survey to determine the incidence of abnormal simple bedside observations and activation of the rapid response team by clinical staff; a prospective audit of all patients experiencing a cardiac arrest, unplanned intensive care unit admission or death over an 8-week period; structured interviews of staff to explore cognitive and sociocultural barriers to activating the RRS. Setting Southern Health is a comprehensive healthcare network with 570 adult in-patient beds across four metropolitan teaching hospitals in the south-eastern sector of Melbourne. Measurements Frequency of physiological instability and outcomes within the in-patient hospital population. Qualitative data from staff interviews were thematically coded. Results The incidence of physiological instability in the acute adult population was 4.04 . Nearly half of these patients (42 ) did not receive an appropriate clinical response from the staff, despite most (69.2 ) recognising their patient met physiological criteria for activating the RRS, and being `quite?, or `very? concerned about their patient (75.8 ). Structured interviews with 91 staff members identified predominantly sociocultural reasons for failure to activate the RRS. Conclusions Despite an organisational commitment to the RRS, clinical staff act on local cultural rules within the clinical environment that are usually not explicit. Better understanding of these informal rules may lead to more appropriate activation of the RRS.

AB - To explore the causes of failure to activate the rapid response system (RRS). The organisation has a recognised incidence of staff failing to act when confronted with a deteriorating patient and leading to adverse outcomes. Design A multi-method study using the following: a point prevalence survey to determine the incidence of abnormal simple bedside observations and activation of the rapid response team by clinical staff; a prospective audit of all patients experiencing a cardiac arrest, unplanned intensive care unit admission or death over an 8-week period; structured interviews of staff to explore cognitive and sociocultural barriers to activating the RRS. Setting Southern Health is a comprehensive healthcare network with 570 adult in-patient beds across four metropolitan teaching hospitals in the south-eastern sector of Melbourne. Measurements Frequency of physiological instability and outcomes within the in-patient hospital population. Qualitative data from staff interviews were thematically coded. Results The incidence of physiological instability in the acute adult population was 4.04 . Nearly half of these patients (42 ) did not receive an appropriate clinical response from the staff, despite most (69.2 ) recognising their patient met physiological criteria for activating the RRS, and being `quite?, or `very? concerned about their patient (75.8 ). Structured interviews with 91 staff members identified predominantly sociocultural reasons for failure to activate the RRS. Conclusions Despite an organisational commitment to the RRS, clinical staff act on local cultural rules within the clinical environment that are usually not explicit. Better understanding of these informal rules may lead to more appropriate activation of the RRS.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000692

U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000692

DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000692

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 569

EP - 575

JO - BMJ: British Medical Journal

JF - BMJ: British Medical Journal

SN - 0959-535X

IS - 7

ER -