What should we teach the teachers? Identifying the learning priorities of clinical supervisors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Clinicians who teach are essential for the health workforce but require faculty development to improve their educational skills. Curricula for faculty development programs are often based on expert frameworks without consideration of the learning priorities as defined by clinical supervisors themselves. We sought to inform these curricula by highlighting clinical supervisors own requirements through answering the research question: what do clinical supervisors identify as relative strengths and areas for improvement in their teaching practice? This mixed methods study employed a modified version of the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (mMCTQ) which included free-text reflections. Descriptive statistics were calculated and content analysis was conducted on textual comments. 481 (49%) of 978 clinical supervisors submitted their mMCTQs and associated reflections for the research study. Clinical supervisors self-identified relatively strong capability with interpersonal skills or attributes and indicated least capability with assisting learners to explore strengths, weaknesses and learning goals. The qualitative category ‘establishing relationships’ was the most reported strength with 224 responses. The qualitative category ‘feedback’ was the most reported area for improvement, with 151 responses. Key areas for curricular focus include: improving feedback practices; stimulating reflective and agentic learning; and managing the logistics of a clinical education environment. Clinical supervisors’ self-identified needs provide a foundation for designing engaging and relevant faculty development programs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-41
Number of pages13
JournalAdvances in Health Sciences Education
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

Keywords

  • Clinical education frameworks
  • Clinical supervision
  • Clinical teaching
  • Faculty development
  • Health professional education

Cite this

@article{0c7f30be8ead4cd88850a4a5e6bb42c8,
title = "What should we teach the teachers? Identifying the learning priorities of clinical supervisors",
abstract = "Clinicians who teach are essential for the health workforce but require faculty development to improve their educational skills. Curricula for faculty development programs are often based on expert frameworks without consideration of the learning priorities as defined by clinical supervisors themselves. We sought to inform these curricula by highlighting clinical supervisors own requirements through answering the research question: what do clinical supervisors identify as relative strengths and areas for improvement in their teaching practice? This mixed methods study employed a modified version of the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (mMCTQ) which included free-text reflections. Descriptive statistics were calculated and content analysis was conducted on textual comments. 481 (49{\%}) of 978 clinical supervisors submitted their mMCTQs and associated reflections for the research study. Clinical supervisors self-identified relatively strong capability with interpersonal skills or attributes and indicated least capability with assisting learners to explore strengths, weaknesses and learning goals. The qualitative category ‘establishing relationships’ was the most reported strength with 224 responses. The qualitative category ‘feedback’ was the most reported area for improvement, with 151 responses. Key areas for curricular focus include: improving feedback practices; stimulating reflective and agentic learning; and managing the logistics of a clinical education environment. Clinical supervisors’ self-identified needs provide a foundation for designing engaging and relevant faculty development programs.",
keywords = "Clinical education frameworks, Clinical supervision, Clinical teaching, Faculty development, Health professional education",
author = "Margaret Bearman and Joanna Tai and Fiona Kent and Vicki Edouard and Debra Nestel and Elizabeth Molloy",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10459-017-9772-3",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "29--41",
journal = "Advances in Health Sciences Education",
issn = "1382-4996",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

What should we teach the teachers? Identifying the learning priorities of clinical supervisors. / Bearman, Margaret; Tai, Joanna; Kent, Fiona; Edouard, Vicki; Nestel, Debra; Molloy, Elizabeth.

In: Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 23, No. 1, 03.2018, p. 29-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What should we teach the teachers? Identifying the learning priorities of clinical supervisors

AU - Bearman, Margaret

AU - Tai, Joanna

AU - Kent, Fiona

AU - Edouard, Vicki

AU - Nestel, Debra

AU - Molloy, Elizabeth

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - Clinicians who teach are essential for the health workforce but require faculty development to improve their educational skills. Curricula for faculty development programs are often based on expert frameworks without consideration of the learning priorities as defined by clinical supervisors themselves. We sought to inform these curricula by highlighting clinical supervisors own requirements through answering the research question: what do clinical supervisors identify as relative strengths and areas for improvement in their teaching practice? This mixed methods study employed a modified version of the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (mMCTQ) which included free-text reflections. Descriptive statistics were calculated and content analysis was conducted on textual comments. 481 (49%) of 978 clinical supervisors submitted their mMCTQs and associated reflections for the research study. Clinical supervisors self-identified relatively strong capability with interpersonal skills or attributes and indicated least capability with assisting learners to explore strengths, weaknesses and learning goals. The qualitative category ‘establishing relationships’ was the most reported strength with 224 responses. The qualitative category ‘feedback’ was the most reported area for improvement, with 151 responses. Key areas for curricular focus include: improving feedback practices; stimulating reflective and agentic learning; and managing the logistics of a clinical education environment. Clinical supervisors’ self-identified needs provide a foundation for designing engaging and relevant faculty development programs.

AB - Clinicians who teach are essential for the health workforce but require faculty development to improve their educational skills. Curricula for faculty development programs are often based on expert frameworks without consideration of the learning priorities as defined by clinical supervisors themselves. We sought to inform these curricula by highlighting clinical supervisors own requirements through answering the research question: what do clinical supervisors identify as relative strengths and areas for improvement in their teaching practice? This mixed methods study employed a modified version of the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (mMCTQ) which included free-text reflections. Descriptive statistics were calculated and content analysis was conducted on textual comments. 481 (49%) of 978 clinical supervisors submitted their mMCTQs and associated reflections for the research study. Clinical supervisors self-identified relatively strong capability with interpersonal skills or attributes and indicated least capability with assisting learners to explore strengths, weaknesses and learning goals. The qualitative category ‘establishing relationships’ was the most reported strength with 224 responses. The qualitative category ‘feedback’ was the most reported area for improvement, with 151 responses. Key areas for curricular focus include: improving feedback practices; stimulating reflective and agentic learning; and managing the logistics of a clinical education environment. Clinical supervisors’ self-identified needs provide a foundation for designing engaging and relevant faculty development programs.

KW - Clinical education frameworks

KW - Clinical supervision

KW - Clinical teaching

KW - Faculty development

KW - Health professional education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015677444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10459-017-9772-3

DO - 10.1007/s10459-017-9772-3

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 29

EP - 41

JO - Advances in Health Sciences Education

JF - Advances in Health Sciences Education

SN - 1382-4996

IS - 1

ER -