What makes a good systematic review and meta-analysis?

A. M. Moller, P. S. Myles

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialOtherpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)428-430
Number of pages3
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume117
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016

Cite this

@article{7a6b83e6ba964a378256f1cf53d5dbc3,
title = "What makes a good systematic review and meta-analysis?",
author = "Moller, {A. M.} and Myles, {P. S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/bja/aew264",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "428--430",
journal = "British Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0007-0912",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

What makes a good systematic review and meta-analysis? / Moller, A. M.; Myles, P. S.

In: British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 117, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 428-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What makes a good systematic review and meta-analysis?

AU - Moller, A. M.

AU - Myles, P. S.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995563262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bja/aew264

DO - 10.1093/bja/aew264

M3 - Editorial

VL - 117

SP - 428

EP - 430

JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0007-0912

IS - 4

ER -