What is the impact of systems of care for heart failure on patients diagnosed with heart failure: A systematic review

Andrea Driscoll, Sharon Meagher, Rhoda Kennedy, Melanie Hay, Jayant Banerji, Donald Campbell, Nicholas Cox, Debra Joy Gascard, David Hare, Karen Page, Voltaire Nadurata, Rhonda Sanders, Harry Patsamanis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Hospital admissions for heart failure are predicted to rise substantially over the next decade placing increasing pressure on the health care system. There is an urgent need to redesign systems of care for heart failure to improve evidence-based practice and create seamless transitions through the continuum of care. The aim of the review was to examine systems of care for heart failure that reduce hospital readmissions and/or mortality. Method: Electronic databases searched were: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, grey literature, reviewed bibliographies and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials and cohort studies from 1st January 2008 to 4th August 2015. Inclusion criteria for studies were: English language, randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials and cohort studies of systems of care for patients diagnosed with heart failure and aimed at reducing hospital readmissions and/or mortality. Three reviewer authors independently assessed articles for eligibility based on title and abstract and then full-text. Quality of evidence was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomised trials and GRADE rating tool for randomised controlled trials. Results: We included 29 articles reporting on systems of care in the workforce, primary care, in-hospital, transitional care, outpatients and telemonitoring. Several studies found that access to a specialist heart failure team/service reduced hospital readmissions and mortality. In primary care, a collaborative model of care where the primary physician shared the care with a cardiologist, improved patient outcomes compared to a primary physician only. During hospitalisation, quality improvement programs improved the quality of inpatient care resulting in reduced hospital readmissions and mortality. In the transitional care phase, heart failure programs, nurse-led clinics, and early outpatient follow-up reduced hospital readmissions. There was a lack of evidence as to the efficacy of telemonitoring with many studies finding conflicting evidence. Conclusion: Redesigning systems of care aimed at improving the translation of evidence into clinical practice and transitional care can potentially improve patient outcomes in a cohort of patients known for high readmission rates and mortality.

Original languageEnglish
Article number195
Number of pages20
JournalBMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Heart failure
  • Hospital readmissions
  • Hospitalisations
  • Primary care
  • Systematic review
  • Systems of care
  • Transitional care
  • Workforce

Cite this

Driscoll, Andrea ; Meagher, Sharon ; Kennedy, Rhoda ; Hay, Melanie ; Banerji, Jayant ; Campbell, Donald ; Cox, Nicholas ; Gascard, Debra Joy ; Hare, David ; Page, Karen ; Nadurata, Voltaire ; Sanders, Rhonda ; Patsamanis, Harry. / What is the impact of systems of care for heart failure on patients diagnosed with heart failure : A systematic review. In: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 1.
@article{171a408c72ed401591eec6e622cbad71,
title = "What is the impact of systems of care for heart failure on patients diagnosed with heart failure: A systematic review",
abstract = "Background: Hospital admissions for heart failure are predicted to rise substantially over the next decade placing increasing pressure on the health care system. There is an urgent need to redesign systems of care for heart failure to improve evidence-based practice and create seamless transitions through the continuum of care. The aim of the review was to examine systems of care for heart failure that reduce hospital readmissions and/or mortality. Method: Electronic databases searched were: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, grey literature, reviewed bibliographies and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials and cohort studies from 1st January 2008 to 4th August 2015. Inclusion criteria for studies were: English language, randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials and cohort studies of systems of care for patients diagnosed with heart failure and aimed at reducing hospital readmissions and/or mortality. Three reviewer authors independently assessed articles for eligibility based on title and abstract and then full-text. Quality of evidence was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomised trials and GRADE rating tool for randomised controlled trials. Results: We included 29 articles reporting on systems of care in the workforce, primary care, in-hospital, transitional care, outpatients and telemonitoring. Several studies found that access to a specialist heart failure team/service reduced hospital readmissions and mortality. In primary care, a collaborative model of care where the primary physician shared the care with a cardiologist, improved patient outcomes compared to a primary physician only. During hospitalisation, quality improvement programs improved the quality of inpatient care resulting in reduced hospital readmissions and mortality. In the transitional care phase, heart failure programs, nurse-led clinics, and early outpatient follow-up reduced hospital readmissions. There was a lack of evidence as to the efficacy of telemonitoring with many studies finding conflicting evidence. Conclusion: Redesigning systems of care aimed at improving the translation of evidence into clinical practice and transitional care can potentially improve patient outcomes in a cohort of patients known for high readmission rates and mortality.",
keywords = "Heart failure, Hospital readmissions, Hospitalisations, Primary care, Systematic review, Systems of care, Transitional care, Workforce",
author = "Andrea Driscoll and Sharon Meagher and Rhoda Kennedy and Melanie Hay and Jayant Banerji and Donald Campbell and Nicholas Cox and Gascard, {Debra Joy} and David Hare and Karen Page and Voltaire Nadurata and Rhonda Sanders and Harry Patsamanis",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1186/s12872-016-0371-7",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "BMC Cardiovascular Disorders",
issn = "1471-2261",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

What is the impact of systems of care for heart failure on patients diagnosed with heart failure : A systematic review. / Driscoll, Andrea; Meagher, Sharon; Kennedy, Rhoda; Hay, Melanie; Banerji, Jayant; Campbell, Donald; Cox, Nicholas; Gascard, Debra Joy; Hare, David; Page, Karen; Nadurata, Voltaire; Sanders, Rhonda; Patsamanis, Harry.

In: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, Vol. 16, No. 1, 195, 11.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the impact of systems of care for heart failure on patients diagnosed with heart failure

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Driscoll, Andrea

AU - Meagher, Sharon

AU - Kennedy, Rhoda

AU - Hay, Melanie

AU - Banerji, Jayant

AU - Campbell, Donald

AU - Cox, Nicholas

AU - Gascard, Debra Joy

AU - Hare, David

AU - Page, Karen

AU - Nadurata, Voltaire

AU - Sanders, Rhonda

AU - Patsamanis, Harry

PY - 2016/10/11

Y1 - 2016/10/11

N2 - Background: Hospital admissions for heart failure are predicted to rise substantially over the next decade placing increasing pressure on the health care system. There is an urgent need to redesign systems of care for heart failure to improve evidence-based practice and create seamless transitions through the continuum of care. The aim of the review was to examine systems of care for heart failure that reduce hospital readmissions and/or mortality. Method: Electronic databases searched were: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, grey literature, reviewed bibliographies and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials and cohort studies from 1st January 2008 to 4th August 2015. Inclusion criteria for studies were: English language, randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials and cohort studies of systems of care for patients diagnosed with heart failure and aimed at reducing hospital readmissions and/or mortality. Three reviewer authors independently assessed articles for eligibility based on title and abstract and then full-text. Quality of evidence was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomised trials and GRADE rating tool for randomised controlled trials. Results: We included 29 articles reporting on systems of care in the workforce, primary care, in-hospital, transitional care, outpatients and telemonitoring. Several studies found that access to a specialist heart failure team/service reduced hospital readmissions and mortality. In primary care, a collaborative model of care where the primary physician shared the care with a cardiologist, improved patient outcomes compared to a primary physician only. During hospitalisation, quality improvement programs improved the quality of inpatient care resulting in reduced hospital readmissions and mortality. In the transitional care phase, heart failure programs, nurse-led clinics, and early outpatient follow-up reduced hospital readmissions. There was a lack of evidence as to the efficacy of telemonitoring with many studies finding conflicting evidence. Conclusion: Redesigning systems of care aimed at improving the translation of evidence into clinical practice and transitional care can potentially improve patient outcomes in a cohort of patients known for high readmission rates and mortality.

AB - Background: Hospital admissions for heart failure are predicted to rise substantially over the next decade placing increasing pressure on the health care system. There is an urgent need to redesign systems of care for heart failure to improve evidence-based practice and create seamless transitions through the continuum of care. The aim of the review was to examine systems of care for heart failure that reduce hospital readmissions and/or mortality. Method: Electronic databases searched were: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, grey literature, reviewed bibliographies and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials and cohort studies from 1st January 2008 to 4th August 2015. Inclusion criteria for studies were: English language, randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials and cohort studies of systems of care for patients diagnosed with heart failure and aimed at reducing hospital readmissions and/or mortality. Three reviewer authors independently assessed articles for eligibility based on title and abstract and then full-text. Quality of evidence was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomised trials and GRADE rating tool for randomised controlled trials. Results: We included 29 articles reporting on systems of care in the workforce, primary care, in-hospital, transitional care, outpatients and telemonitoring. Several studies found that access to a specialist heart failure team/service reduced hospital readmissions and mortality. In primary care, a collaborative model of care where the primary physician shared the care with a cardiologist, improved patient outcomes compared to a primary physician only. During hospitalisation, quality improvement programs improved the quality of inpatient care resulting in reduced hospital readmissions and mortality. In the transitional care phase, heart failure programs, nurse-led clinics, and early outpatient follow-up reduced hospital readmissions. There was a lack of evidence as to the efficacy of telemonitoring with many studies finding conflicting evidence. Conclusion: Redesigning systems of care aimed at improving the translation of evidence into clinical practice and transitional care can potentially improve patient outcomes in a cohort of patients known for high readmission rates and mortality.

KW - Heart failure

KW - Hospital readmissions

KW - Hospitalisations

KW - Primary care

KW - Systematic review

KW - Systems of care

KW - Transitional care

KW - Workforce

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995745322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12872-016-0371-7

DO - 10.1186/s12872-016-0371-7

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

JF - BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

SN - 1471-2261

IS - 1

M1 - 195

ER -