What Is “Publicly Available Data”? Exploring Blurred Public–Private Boundaries and Ethical Practices Through a Case Study on Instagram

Signe Ravn, Ashley Barnwell, Barbara Barbosa Neves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article adds to the literature on ethics in digital research by problematizing simple understandings of what constitutes “publicly available data,” thereby complicating common “consent waiver” approaches. Based on our recent study of representations of family life on Instagram, a platform with a distinct visual premise, we discuss the ethical challenges we encountered and our practices for moving forward. We ground this in Lauren Berlant’s concept of “intimate publics” to conceptualize the different understandings of “publics” that appear to be at play. We make the case for a more reflexive approach to social media research ethics that builds on the socio-techno-ethical affordances of the platform to address difficult questions about how to determine social media users’ diverse, and sometimes contradictory, understandings of what is “public.”.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 27 May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • consent
  • digital ethics
  • Instagram
  • public/private
  • research ethics
  • socio-techno-ethical affordances

Cite this

@article{dbf87127fadb4c50a1b60098bf2cff3d,
title = "What Is “Publicly Available Data”? Exploring Blurred Public–Private Boundaries and Ethical Practices Through a Case Study on Instagram",
abstract = "This article adds to the literature on ethics in digital research by problematizing simple understandings of what constitutes “publicly available data,” thereby complicating common “consent waiver” approaches. Based on our recent study of representations of family life on Instagram, a platform with a distinct visual premise, we discuss the ethical challenges we encountered and our practices for moving forward. We ground this in Lauren Berlant’s concept of “intimate publics” to conceptualize the different understandings of “publics” that appear to be at play. We make the case for a more reflexive approach to social media research ethics that builds on the socio-techno-ethical affordances of the platform to address difficult questions about how to determine social media users’ diverse, and sometimes contradictory, understandings of what is “public.”.",
keywords = "consent, digital ethics, Instagram, public/private, research ethics, socio-techno-ethical affordances",
author = "Signe Ravn and Ashley Barnwell and {Barbosa Neves}, Barbara",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1177/1556264619850736",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics",
issn = "1556-2646",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Is “Publicly Available Data”? Exploring Blurred Public–Private Boundaries and Ethical Practices Through a Case Study on Instagram

AU - Ravn, Signe

AU - Barnwell, Ashley

AU - Barbosa Neves, Barbara

PY - 2019/5/27

Y1 - 2019/5/27

N2 - This article adds to the literature on ethics in digital research by problematizing simple understandings of what constitutes “publicly available data,” thereby complicating common “consent waiver” approaches. Based on our recent study of representations of family life on Instagram, a platform with a distinct visual premise, we discuss the ethical challenges we encountered and our practices for moving forward. We ground this in Lauren Berlant’s concept of “intimate publics” to conceptualize the different understandings of “publics” that appear to be at play. We make the case for a more reflexive approach to social media research ethics that builds on the socio-techno-ethical affordances of the platform to address difficult questions about how to determine social media users’ diverse, and sometimes contradictory, understandings of what is “public.”.

AB - This article adds to the literature on ethics in digital research by problematizing simple understandings of what constitutes “publicly available data,” thereby complicating common “consent waiver” approaches. Based on our recent study of representations of family life on Instagram, a platform with a distinct visual premise, we discuss the ethical challenges we encountered and our practices for moving forward. We ground this in Lauren Berlant’s concept of “intimate publics” to conceptualize the different understandings of “publics” that appear to be at play. We make the case for a more reflexive approach to social media research ethics that builds on the socio-techno-ethical affordances of the platform to address difficult questions about how to determine social media users’ diverse, and sometimes contradictory, understandings of what is “public.”.

KW - consent

KW - digital ethics

KW - Instagram

KW - public/private

KW - research ethics

KW - socio-techno-ethical affordances

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066842878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1556264619850736

DO - 10.1177/1556264619850736

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

JF - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

SN - 1556-2646

ER -