What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability

Adrian Smith, Rob Raven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

524 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The transitions literature emphasises the role of niches, defined as a protective space for path-breaking innovations. Surprisingly, the concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated. Our analysis identifies effective protection as having three properties in wider transition processes: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. Empowerment is considered the least developed in current niche literature. It can be understood as either processes that make niche innovations competitive within unchanged selection environments (fit-and-conform) or as processes that contribute to changes in mainstream selection environments in ways favourable to a path-breaking niche innovation (stretch-and-transform). Adopting a more constructivist perspective, we subsequently argue that analysis of these properties needs to be complemented with particular attention for the politics involved in their construction. Attention to empowerment confirms the view that niche actors need to link to wider processes of social change, and suggests how this arises. The paper ends with an outlook upon two promising research avenues: (1) the reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework; (2) analyses of the diverse (political) narratives seeking to empower niches across time and space.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1025-1036
Number of pages12
JournalResearch Policy
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Empowerment
  • Narratives
  • Niche
  • Protective space
  • Sustainability

Cite this

@article{632408abf8c14bc7b741cfa0fbcbad47,
title = "What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability",
abstract = "The transitions literature emphasises the role of niches, defined as a protective space for path-breaking innovations. Surprisingly, the concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated. Our analysis identifies effective protection as having three properties in wider transition processes: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. Empowerment is considered the least developed in current niche literature. It can be understood as either processes that make niche innovations competitive within unchanged selection environments (fit-and-conform) or as processes that contribute to changes in mainstream selection environments in ways favourable to a path-breaking niche innovation (stretch-and-transform). Adopting a more constructivist perspective, we subsequently argue that analysis of these properties needs to be complemented with particular attention for the politics involved in their construction. Attention to empowerment confirms the view that niche actors need to link to wider processes of social change, and suggests how this arises. The paper ends with an outlook upon two promising research avenues: (1) the reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework; (2) analyses of the diverse (political) narratives seeking to empower niches across time and space.",
keywords = "Empowerment, Narratives, Niche, Protective space, Sustainability",
author = "Adrian Smith and Rob Raven",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1025--1036",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. / Smith, Adrian; Raven, Rob.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 41, No. 6, 01.07.2012, p. 1025-1036.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability

AU - Smith, Adrian

AU - Raven, Rob

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - The transitions literature emphasises the role of niches, defined as a protective space for path-breaking innovations. Surprisingly, the concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated. Our analysis identifies effective protection as having three properties in wider transition processes: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. Empowerment is considered the least developed in current niche literature. It can be understood as either processes that make niche innovations competitive within unchanged selection environments (fit-and-conform) or as processes that contribute to changes in mainstream selection environments in ways favourable to a path-breaking niche innovation (stretch-and-transform). Adopting a more constructivist perspective, we subsequently argue that analysis of these properties needs to be complemented with particular attention for the politics involved in their construction. Attention to empowerment confirms the view that niche actors need to link to wider processes of social change, and suggests how this arises. The paper ends with an outlook upon two promising research avenues: (1) the reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework; (2) analyses of the diverse (political) narratives seeking to empower niches across time and space.

AB - The transitions literature emphasises the role of niches, defined as a protective space for path-breaking innovations. Surprisingly, the concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated. Our analysis identifies effective protection as having three properties in wider transition processes: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. Empowerment is considered the least developed in current niche literature. It can be understood as either processes that make niche innovations competitive within unchanged selection environments (fit-and-conform) or as processes that contribute to changes in mainstream selection environments in ways favourable to a path-breaking niche innovation (stretch-and-transform). Adopting a more constructivist perspective, we subsequently argue that analysis of these properties needs to be complemented with particular attention for the politics involved in their construction. Attention to empowerment confirms the view that niche actors need to link to wider processes of social change, and suggests how this arises. The paper ends with an outlook upon two promising research avenues: (1) the reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework; (2) analyses of the diverse (political) narratives seeking to empower niches across time and space.

KW - Empowerment

KW - Narratives

KW - Niche

KW - Protective space

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862777797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 1025

EP - 1036

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 6

ER -