What is a 'Supreme Court of a State'?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales the High Court held that it is a ‘defining characteristic’ of a state Supreme Court that it possess a judicial review jurisdiction in respect of jurisdictional errors. The High Court considered that were a state Supreme Court not to possess such a jurisdiction it would fail to meet the constitutional description ‘Supreme Court of a State’ and that, accordingly, it is beyond the legislative competence of a state parliament to deprive a state Supreme Court of that jurisdiction. This article explores the idea that state Supreme Courts possess defining characteristics and considers what other defining characteristics might be possessed by state Supreme Courts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)295-315
Number of pages21
JournalThe Sydney Law Review
Volume34
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Cite this