'What do you think the aims of doing a practical chemistry course are?' A comparison of the views of students and teaching staff across three universities

Stephen R. George-Williams, Angela L. Ziebell, Russell R.A. Kitson, Paolo Coppo, Christopher D. Thompson, Tina L. Overton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The aims of teaching laboratories is an important and ever-evolving topic of discussion amongst teaching staff at teaching institutions. It is often assumed that both teaching staff and students are implicitly aware of these aims, although this is rarely tested or measured. This assumption can lead to mismatched beliefs between students and teaching staff and, if not corrected for, could lead to negative learning gains for students and become a source of frustration for teaching staff. In order to measure and identify this gap in a manner that could be readily generalised to other institutions, a single open question-'What do you think the aims of doing a practical chemistry course are?'-was distributed to students and teaching staff at two Australian universities and one UK university. Qualitative analysis of the responses revealed that students and teaching staff held relatively narrow views of teaching laboratories, particularly focusing on aims more in line with expository experiences (e.g. development of practical skills or enhances understanding of theory). Whilst some differences were noted between students at the three institutions, the large amount of similarities in their responses indicated a fairly common perception of laboratory aims. Of the three groups, academics actually held the narrowest view of teaching laboratories, typically neglecting the preparation of students for the workforce or the simple increase in laboratory experience the students could gain. This study highlights gaps between the perceptions of students and teaching staff with regards to laboratory aims alongside revealing that all three groups held relatively simplified views of teaching laboratories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)463-473
Number of pages11
JournalChemistry Education Research and Practice
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

@article{e09b7f07bf59465182820005c73e507a,
title = "'What do you think the aims of doing a practical chemistry course are?' A comparison of the views of students and teaching staff across three universities",
abstract = "The aims of teaching laboratories is an important and ever-evolving topic of discussion amongst teaching staff at teaching institutions. It is often assumed that both teaching staff and students are implicitly aware of these aims, although this is rarely tested or measured. This assumption can lead to mismatched beliefs between students and teaching staff and, if not corrected for, could lead to negative learning gains for students and become a source of frustration for teaching staff. In order to measure and identify this gap in a manner that could be readily generalised to other institutions, a single open question-'What do you think the aims of doing a practical chemistry course are?'-was distributed to students and teaching staff at two Australian universities and one UK university. Qualitative analysis of the responses revealed that students and teaching staff held relatively narrow views of teaching laboratories, particularly focusing on aims more in line with expository experiences (e.g. development of practical skills or enhances understanding of theory). Whilst some differences were noted between students at the three institutions, the large amount of similarities in their responses indicated a fairly common perception of laboratory aims. Of the three groups, academics actually held the narrowest view of teaching laboratories, typically neglecting the preparation of students for the workforce or the simple increase in laboratory experience the students could gain. This study highlights gaps between the perceptions of students and teaching staff with regards to laboratory aims alongside revealing that all three groups held relatively simplified views of teaching laboratories.",
author = "George-Williams, {Stephen R.} and Ziebell, {Angela L.} and Kitson, {Russell R.A.} and Paolo Coppo and Thompson, {Christopher D.} and Overton, {Tina L.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1039/c7rp00177k",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "463--473",
journal = "Chemistry Education Research and Practice",
issn = "1756-1108",
publisher = "The Royal Society of Chemistry",
number = "2",

}

'What do you think the aims of doing a practical chemistry course are?' A comparison of the views of students and teaching staff across three universities. / George-Williams, Stephen R.; Ziebell, Angela L.; Kitson, Russell R.A.; Coppo, Paolo; Thompson, Christopher D.; Overton, Tina L.

In: Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2018, p. 463-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'What do you think the aims of doing a practical chemistry course are?' A comparison of the views of students and teaching staff across three universities

AU - George-Williams, Stephen R.

AU - Ziebell, Angela L.

AU - Kitson, Russell R.A.

AU - Coppo, Paolo

AU - Thompson, Christopher D.

AU - Overton, Tina L.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The aims of teaching laboratories is an important and ever-evolving topic of discussion amongst teaching staff at teaching institutions. It is often assumed that both teaching staff and students are implicitly aware of these aims, although this is rarely tested or measured. This assumption can lead to mismatched beliefs between students and teaching staff and, if not corrected for, could lead to negative learning gains for students and become a source of frustration for teaching staff. In order to measure and identify this gap in a manner that could be readily generalised to other institutions, a single open question-'What do you think the aims of doing a practical chemistry course are?'-was distributed to students and teaching staff at two Australian universities and one UK university. Qualitative analysis of the responses revealed that students and teaching staff held relatively narrow views of teaching laboratories, particularly focusing on aims more in line with expository experiences (e.g. development of practical skills or enhances understanding of theory). Whilst some differences were noted between students at the three institutions, the large amount of similarities in their responses indicated a fairly common perception of laboratory aims. Of the three groups, academics actually held the narrowest view of teaching laboratories, typically neglecting the preparation of students for the workforce or the simple increase in laboratory experience the students could gain. This study highlights gaps between the perceptions of students and teaching staff with regards to laboratory aims alongside revealing that all three groups held relatively simplified views of teaching laboratories.

AB - The aims of teaching laboratories is an important and ever-evolving topic of discussion amongst teaching staff at teaching institutions. It is often assumed that both teaching staff and students are implicitly aware of these aims, although this is rarely tested or measured. This assumption can lead to mismatched beliefs between students and teaching staff and, if not corrected for, could lead to negative learning gains for students and become a source of frustration for teaching staff. In order to measure and identify this gap in a manner that could be readily generalised to other institutions, a single open question-'What do you think the aims of doing a practical chemistry course are?'-was distributed to students and teaching staff at two Australian universities and one UK university. Qualitative analysis of the responses revealed that students and teaching staff held relatively narrow views of teaching laboratories, particularly focusing on aims more in line with expository experiences (e.g. development of practical skills or enhances understanding of theory). Whilst some differences were noted between students at the three institutions, the large amount of similarities in their responses indicated a fairly common perception of laboratory aims. Of the three groups, academics actually held the narrowest view of teaching laboratories, typically neglecting the preparation of students for the workforce or the simple increase in laboratory experience the students could gain. This study highlights gaps between the perceptions of students and teaching staff with regards to laboratory aims alongside revealing that all three groups held relatively simplified views of teaching laboratories.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048653404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/c7rp00177k

DO - 10.1039/c7rp00177k

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 463

EP - 473

JO - Chemistry Education Research and Practice

JF - Chemistry Education Research and Practice

SN - 1756-1108

IS - 2

ER -