What derivations cannot do

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

I think that there is much about contemporary philosophy of religion that should change. Most importantly, philosophy of religion should be philosophy of religion, not merely philosophy of theism, or philosophy of Christianity, or philosophy of certain denominations of Christianity, or the like. Here, however, I shall complain about one fairly narrow aspect of contemporary philosophy of religion that really irks me: its obsession with derivations that have as their conclusion either the claim that God exists or the claim that God does not exist. I shall work myself up by degrees.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323 - 333
Number of pages11
JournalReligious Studies
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this