'We still have bombings': school principals and insurgent violence in Southern Thailand

Melanie Carol Brooks, Ekkarin Sungtong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This study explored how principals in Southern Thailand lead schools in areas of violent conflict. In order to better understand principals’ perspectives on working in such a context, the study was guided by Lynn Davies’ Drivers of Fragility Framework, which identifies five ‘drivers’ of conflict in communities: (1) problems of governance; (2) lack of security; (3) weak economy; (4) cultures of power; and (5) environmental degradation.
Data were collected through 30 interviews and 6 school site observations. We used Davies’ Drivers of Fragility Framework as a priori analytic codes. Then, using analytic induction, we gathered additional data to identify and then refine emergent categories. Two themes emerged from the analysis of the findings, specifically the misalignment of national education policies to the local context and poor teacher quality. The findings suggested that principals were able to influence local governance, community-based security, and environmental
sustainability, but were limited in their ability to influence the weak economy
or cultures of power in their communities. This study is a unique contribution to research focused on how leadership is enacted in non-Western cultural contexts and sheds light on what influence principals may have in alleviating social fragility.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-533
Number of pages29
JournalInternational Journal of Leadership in Education
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this

@article{7b32f9917f9b40ba9468dac7e6710f2b,
title = "'We still have bombings': school principals and insurgent violence in Southern Thailand",
abstract = "This study explored how principals in Southern Thailand lead schools in areas of violent conflict. In order to better understand principals’ perspectives on working in such a context, the study was guided by Lynn Davies’ Drivers of Fragility Framework, which identifies five ‘drivers’ of conflict in communities: (1) problems of governance; (2) lack of security; (3) weak economy; (4) cultures of power; and (5) environmental degradation.Data were collected through 30 interviews and 6 school site observations. We used Davies’ Drivers of Fragility Framework as a priori analytic codes. Then, using analytic induction, we gathered additional data to identify and then refine emergent categories. Two themes emerged from the analysis of the findings, specifically the misalignment of national education policies to the local context and poor teacher quality. The findings suggested that principals were able to influence local governance, community-based security, and environmentalsustainability, but were limited in their ability to influence the weak economyor cultures of power in their communities. This study is a unique contribution to research focused on how leadership is enacted in non-Western cultural contexts and sheds light on what influence principals may have in alleviating social fragility.",
author = "Brooks, {Melanie Carol} and Ekkarin Sungtong",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/13603124.2015.1059489",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "505--533",
journal = "International Journal of Leadership in Education",
issn = "1360-3124",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

'We still have bombings' : school principals and insurgent violence in Southern Thailand. / Brooks, Melanie Carol; Sungtong, Ekkarin.

In: International Journal of Leadership in Education, Vol. 19, No. 5, 2016, p. 505-533.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'We still have bombings'

T2 - school principals and insurgent violence in Southern Thailand

AU - Brooks, Melanie Carol

AU - Sungtong, Ekkarin

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This study explored how principals in Southern Thailand lead schools in areas of violent conflict. In order to better understand principals’ perspectives on working in such a context, the study was guided by Lynn Davies’ Drivers of Fragility Framework, which identifies five ‘drivers’ of conflict in communities: (1) problems of governance; (2) lack of security; (3) weak economy; (4) cultures of power; and (5) environmental degradation.Data were collected through 30 interviews and 6 school site observations. We used Davies’ Drivers of Fragility Framework as a priori analytic codes. Then, using analytic induction, we gathered additional data to identify and then refine emergent categories. Two themes emerged from the analysis of the findings, specifically the misalignment of national education policies to the local context and poor teacher quality. The findings suggested that principals were able to influence local governance, community-based security, and environmentalsustainability, but were limited in their ability to influence the weak economyor cultures of power in their communities. This study is a unique contribution to research focused on how leadership is enacted in non-Western cultural contexts and sheds light on what influence principals may have in alleviating social fragility.

AB - This study explored how principals in Southern Thailand lead schools in areas of violent conflict. In order to better understand principals’ perspectives on working in such a context, the study was guided by Lynn Davies’ Drivers of Fragility Framework, which identifies five ‘drivers’ of conflict in communities: (1) problems of governance; (2) lack of security; (3) weak economy; (4) cultures of power; and (5) environmental degradation.Data were collected through 30 interviews and 6 school site observations. We used Davies’ Drivers of Fragility Framework as a priori analytic codes. Then, using analytic induction, we gathered additional data to identify and then refine emergent categories. Two themes emerged from the analysis of the findings, specifically the misalignment of national education policies to the local context and poor teacher quality. The findings suggested that principals were able to influence local governance, community-based security, and environmentalsustainability, but were limited in their ability to influence the weak economyor cultures of power in their communities. This study is a unique contribution to research focused on how leadership is enacted in non-Western cultural contexts and sheds light on what influence principals may have in alleviating social fragility.

U2 - 10.1080/13603124.2015.1059489

DO - 10.1080/13603124.2015.1059489

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 505

EP - 533

JO - International Journal of Leadership in Education

JF - International Journal of Leadership in Education

SN - 1360-3124

IS - 5

ER -