‘We are not North Korea’

Propaganda and professionalism in the People’s Republic of China

Margaret Simons, David Nolan, Scott Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article draws on an empirical analysis of the testimonies of Chinese journalists to (re)consider the nature of professionalism in contemporary Chinese journalism. We draw on earlier work by a number of scholars to develop an analysis of the testimonies in order to trace both how professionalism is shaped by cultural, social, organizational, institutional and political influences, and how these work to shape everyday journalistic practices and outputs. We conclude that professionalization is best understood not as a shift towards an ideal version of autonomous, public service–oriented journalism, but instead as a process informed by diverse and somewhat contradictory influences, including many that are internal to China as well as some that are near universal. Not only are journalists clearly concerned to be distinguished from ‘propagandists’, but editors also engage in tactical practices and organizational strategies that allow a meaningful autonomy from the state. These are not only influenced by conflicting normative discourses of journalism but have also become both a necessity for establishing the legitimacy of individual journalists and news institutions and to facilitate their viability in highly competitive news markets.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-237
Number of pages19
JournalMedia, Culture and Society
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • China
  • journalism
  • journalism practice
  • media systems
  • professionalism
  • professionalization

Cite this

@article{7bf6a4bbc25f416c9bdaf62cc23e32ff,
title = "‘We are not North Korea’: Propaganda and professionalism in the People’s Republic of China",
abstract = "This article draws on an empirical analysis of the testimonies of Chinese journalists to (re)consider the nature of professionalism in contemporary Chinese journalism. We draw on earlier work by a number of scholars to develop an analysis of the testimonies in order to trace both how professionalism is shaped by cultural, social, organizational, institutional and political influences, and how these work to shape everyday journalistic practices and outputs. We conclude that professionalization is best understood not as a shift towards an ideal version of autonomous, public service–oriented journalism, but instead as a process informed by diverse and somewhat contradictory influences, including many that are internal to China as well as some that are near universal. Not only are journalists clearly concerned to be distinguished from ‘propagandists’, but editors also engage in tactical practices and organizational strategies that allow a meaningful autonomy from the state. These are not only influenced by conflicting normative discourses of journalism but have also become both a necessity for establishing the legitimacy of individual journalists and news institutions and to facilitate their viability in highly competitive news markets.",
keywords = "China, journalism, journalism practice, media systems, professionalism, professionalization",
author = "Margaret Simons and David Nolan and Scott Wright",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0163443716643154",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "219--237",
journal = "Media, Culture and Society",
issn = "0163-4437",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

‘We are not North Korea’ : Propaganda and professionalism in the People’s Republic of China. / Simons, Margaret; Nolan, David; Wright, Scott.

In: Media, Culture and Society, Vol. 39, No. 2, 01.03.2017, p. 219-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘We are not North Korea’

T2 - Propaganda and professionalism in the People’s Republic of China

AU - Simons, Margaret

AU - Nolan, David

AU - Wright, Scott

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - This article draws on an empirical analysis of the testimonies of Chinese journalists to (re)consider the nature of professionalism in contemporary Chinese journalism. We draw on earlier work by a number of scholars to develop an analysis of the testimonies in order to trace both how professionalism is shaped by cultural, social, organizational, institutional and political influences, and how these work to shape everyday journalistic practices and outputs. We conclude that professionalization is best understood not as a shift towards an ideal version of autonomous, public service–oriented journalism, but instead as a process informed by diverse and somewhat contradictory influences, including many that are internal to China as well as some that are near universal. Not only are journalists clearly concerned to be distinguished from ‘propagandists’, but editors also engage in tactical practices and organizational strategies that allow a meaningful autonomy from the state. These are not only influenced by conflicting normative discourses of journalism but have also become both a necessity for establishing the legitimacy of individual journalists and news institutions and to facilitate their viability in highly competitive news markets.

AB - This article draws on an empirical analysis of the testimonies of Chinese journalists to (re)consider the nature of professionalism in contemporary Chinese journalism. We draw on earlier work by a number of scholars to develop an analysis of the testimonies in order to trace both how professionalism is shaped by cultural, social, organizational, institutional and political influences, and how these work to shape everyday journalistic practices and outputs. We conclude that professionalization is best understood not as a shift towards an ideal version of autonomous, public service–oriented journalism, but instead as a process informed by diverse and somewhat contradictory influences, including many that are internal to China as well as some that are near universal. Not only are journalists clearly concerned to be distinguished from ‘propagandists’, but editors also engage in tactical practices and organizational strategies that allow a meaningful autonomy from the state. These are not only influenced by conflicting normative discourses of journalism but have also become both a necessity for establishing the legitimacy of individual journalists and news institutions and to facilitate their viability in highly competitive news markets.

KW - China

KW - journalism

KW - journalism practice

KW - media systems

KW - professionalism

KW - professionalization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014647373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0163443716643154

DO - 10.1177/0163443716643154

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 219

EP - 237

JO - Media, Culture and Society

JF - Media, Culture and Society

SN - 0163-4437

IS - 2

ER -