Was Weber wrong? A human capital theory of protestant economic history

Sascha O. Becker, Ludger Woessmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

327 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Max Weber attributed the higher economic prosperity of Protestant regions to a Protestant work ethic. We provide an alternative theory: Protestant economies prospered because instruction in reading the Bible generated the human capital crucial to economic prosperity. We test the theory using county-level data from late-nineteenth-century Prussia, exploiting the initial concentric dispersion of the Reformation to use distance to Wittenberg as an instrument for Protestantism. We find that Protestantism indeed led to higher economic prosperity, but also to better education. Our results are consistent with Protestants' higher literacy accounting for most of the gap in economic prosperity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)531-596
Number of pages66
JournalQuarterly Journal of Economics
Volume124
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2009
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{38ece0dfb2394c0cb5a84024ca482151,
title = "Was Weber wrong? A human capital theory of protestant economic history",
abstract = "Max Weber attributed the higher economic prosperity of Protestant regions to a Protestant work ethic. We provide an alternative theory: Protestant economies prospered because instruction in reading the Bible generated the human capital crucial to economic prosperity. We test the theory using county-level data from late-nineteenth-century Prussia, exploiting the initial concentric dispersion of the Reformation to use distance to Wittenberg as an instrument for Protestantism. We find that Protestantism indeed led to higher economic prosperity, but also to better education. Our results are consistent with Protestants' higher literacy accounting for most of the gap in economic prosperity.",
author = "Becker, {Sascha O.} and Ludger Woessmann",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.531",
language = "English",
volume = "124",
pages = "531--596",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Economics",
issn = "0033-5533",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Was Weber wrong? A human capital theory of protestant economic history. / Becker, Sascha O.; Woessmann, Ludger.

In: Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 124, No. 2, 05.2009, p. 531-596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Was Weber wrong? A human capital theory of protestant economic history

AU - Becker, Sascha O.

AU - Woessmann, Ludger

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Max Weber attributed the higher economic prosperity of Protestant regions to a Protestant work ethic. We provide an alternative theory: Protestant economies prospered because instruction in reading the Bible generated the human capital crucial to economic prosperity. We test the theory using county-level data from late-nineteenth-century Prussia, exploiting the initial concentric dispersion of the Reformation to use distance to Wittenberg as an instrument for Protestantism. We find that Protestantism indeed led to higher economic prosperity, but also to better education. Our results are consistent with Protestants' higher literacy accounting for most of the gap in economic prosperity.

AB - Max Weber attributed the higher economic prosperity of Protestant regions to a Protestant work ethic. We provide an alternative theory: Protestant economies prospered because instruction in reading the Bible generated the human capital crucial to economic prosperity. We test the theory using county-level data from late-nineteenth-century Prussia, exploiting the initial concentric dispersion of the Reformation to use distance to Wittenberg as an instrument for Protestantism. We find that Protestantism indeed led to higher economic prosperity, but also to better education. Our results are consistent with Protestants' higher literacy accounting for most of the gap in economic prosperity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650151365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.531

DO - 10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.531

M3 - Article

VL - 124

SP - 531

EP - 596

JO - Quarterly Journal of Economics

JF - Quarterly Journal of Economics

SN - 0033-5533

IS - 2

ER -