TY - JOUR
T1 - Waiting to be discharged from intensive care units
T2 - Key factors shaping patient and family experiences
AU - Peet, Jacqueline
AU - Murray, Lauren
AU - Ramanan, Mahesh
AU - Jacobs, Kylie
AU - Brailsford, Jane
AU - Osmond, Amelia
AU - Kajevu, Moreblessing
AU - Garrett, Peter
AU - Tabah, Alexis
AU - Mock, Carol
AU - Lin, Frances Fengzhi
A2 - Chen, Yingyan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Objectives: To explore the factors that facilitate and hinder intensive care unit (ICU) discharge processes related to patients and their family members. Methods: This was a qualitative exploratory study conducted in three regional adult ICUs in Queensland, Australia. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with patients and their family members (or patient representatives) in addition to daily reflections based on direct observation. A deductive content analysis was undertaken using the Structure, Process, and Outcomes framework, followed by an inductive approach to generate themes. Results: A total of 16 participants participated in interviews, involving 14 patients, one family member, and one patient representative. Four themes included a desire to be involved, being kept informed, uncertainty in waiting, and the discharge rush. Participants spoke about the desire to be involved in their care and discharge transition. There was a prevailing tension among patients about being kept informed. Although participants remarked that staff communication was reassuring, supportive, and comforting, they noted that timelines for discharge were often unclear, causing hesitation in the discharge process and minimal information before a sudden transfer. Uncertainty in waiting was frequently mentioned by the participants and also reflected in the daily reflections. This uncertainty led to consequences, such as discharge against medical advice and after-hours discharge rush. Conclusion: The findings of this study support existing literature that underlines the importance of patient and family involvement in care, effective communication, and coordination during the discharge processes. After-hours discharge rush should be avoided for the safety of the patients and others on the wards. Implications for clinical practice: Gaining an understanding of patient and family perspectives on the ICU discharge processes can guide clinicians in developing strategies to improve the continuity and quality of care and therefore enhance patient safety during ICU discharge.
AB - Objectives: To explore the factors that facilitate and hinder intensive care unit (ICU) discharge processes related to patients and their family members. Methods: This was a qualitative exploratory study conducted in three regional adult ICUs in Queensland, Australia. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with patients and their family members (or patient representatives) in addition to daily reflections based on direct observation. A deductive content analysis was undertaken using the Structure, Process, and Outcomes framework, followed by an inductive approach to generate themes. Results: A total of 16 participants participated in interviews, involving 14 patients, one family member, and one patient representative. Four themes included a desire to be involved, being kept informed, uncertainty in waiting, and the discharge rush. Participants spoke about the desire to be involved in their care and discharge transition. There was a prevailing tension among patients about being kept informed. Although participants remarked that staff communication was reassuring, supportive, and comforting, they noted that timelines for discharge were often unclear, causing hesitation in the discharge process and minimal information before a sudden transfer. Uncertainty in waiting was frequently mentioned by the participants and also reflected in the daily reflections. This uncertainty led to consequences, such as discharge against medical advice and after-hours discharge rush. Conclusion: The findings of this study support existing literature that underlines the importance of patient and family involvement in care, effective communication, and coordination during the discharge processes. After-hours discharge rush should be avoided for the safety of the patients and others on the wards. Implications for clinical practice: Gaining an understanding of patient and family perspectives on the ICU discharge processes can guide clinicians in developing strategies to improve the continuity and quality of care and therefore enhance patient safety during ICU discharge.
KW - After-hours discharge
KW - Discharge
KW - Discharge delay
KW - Intensive care units
KW - Patient perception
KW - Transfer
KW - Transition
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85216867857
U2 - 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103961
DO - 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103961
M3 - Article
C2 - 39914326
AN - SCOPUS:85216867857
SN - 0964-3397
VL - 87
JO - Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
JF - Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
M1 - 103961
ER -