Waist circumference is better than body mass index, but sagittal anterior diameter may be even better

U. Gurunathan, P. S. Myles

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOtherpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Article numberaew454
Pages (from-to)274-275
Number of pages2
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume118
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jan 2017

Cite this

@article{94e8854460f94097925902dadf4f92da,
title = "Waist circumference is better than body mass index, but sagittal anterior diameter may be even better",
author = "U. Gurunathan and Myles, {P. S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1093/bja/aew454",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "274--275",
journal = "British Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0007-0912",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Waist circumference is better than body mass index, but sagittal anterior diameter may be even better. / Gurunathan, U.; Myles, P. S.

In: British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 118, No. 2, aew454, 18.01.2017, p. 274-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Waist circumference is better than body mass index, but sagittal anterior diameter may be even better

AU - Gurunathan, U.

AU - Myles, P. S.

PY - 2017/1/18

Y1 - 2017/1/18

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020840149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bja/aew454

DO - 10.1093/bja/aew454

M3 - Letter

VL - 118

SP - 274

EP - 275

JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0007-0912

IS - 2

M1 - aew454

ER -