Video strategies improved health professional knowledge across different contexts

a helix counterbalanced randomized controlled study

Mitchell N. Sarkies, Stephen Maloney, Mark Symmons, Terry P. Haines

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to apply a novel helix counterbalanced randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the effectiveness of video vs. written knowledge translation strategies for improving health professional knowledge of evidence provided in scientific journal articles. Study Design and Setting: A Helix counterbalanced randomized controlled trial was used to compare the impact of delivering research information via video or written modalities compared to a no-information control across three health contexts. Interventions were delivered and data collected via an online survey to nursing and allied health professionals across five hospitals within a public health service in Melbourne, Australia. A knowledge test measuring alignment between respondent perceived benefit of the intervention and conclusions listed in the journal article was the primary outcome. Results: There were 119 participants recruited with n = 13 incomplete responses. Exposure to the video increased the likelihood of a knowledge test response that was aligned with the research evidence compared to the no-information control (OR 2.61; 95% CI 1.40, 4.89; P = 0.003), but this was not the case for exposure to the written modality (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.75, 2.57; P = 0.294). Conclusion: Providing video knowledge translation strategies to nursing and allied health professionals increases the likelihood they will understand the main findings from scientific journal articles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume112
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2019

Keywords

  • Counterbalanced
  • Deep vein thrombosis
  • Evidence
  • Falls
  • Helix
  • Implementation
  • Professional education
  • Randomised controlled trial
  • Video
  • Written

Cite this

@article{25ac7c26d56542c5b670727885b2428d,
title = "Video strategies improved health professional knowledge across different contexts: a helix counterbalanced randomized controlled study",
abstract = "Objective: This study aimed to apply a novel helix counterbalanced randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the effectiveness of video vs. written knowledge translation strategies for improving health professional knowledge of evidence provided in scientific journal articles. Study Design and Setting: A Helix counterbalanced randomized controlled trial was used to compare the impact of delivering research information via video or written modalities compared to a no-information control across three health contexts. Interventions were delivered and data collected via an online survey to nursing and allied health professionals across five hospitals within a public health service in Melbourne, Australia. A knowledge test measuring alignment between respondent perceived benefit of the intervention and conclusions listed in the journal article was the primary outcome. Results: There were 119 participants recruited with n = 13 incomplete responses. Exposure to the video increased the likelihood of a knowledge test response that was aligned with the research evidence compared to the no-information control (OR 2.61; 95{\%} CI 1.40, 4.89; P = 0.003), but this was not the case for exposure to the written modality (OR 1.39; 95{\%} CI 0.75, 2.57; P = 0.294). Conclusion: Providing video knowledge translation strategies to nursing and allied health professionals increases the likelihood they will understand the main findings from scientific journal articles.",
keywords = "Counterbalanced, Deep vein thrombosis, Evidence, Falls, Helix, Implementation, Professional education, Randomised controlled trial, Video, Written",
author = "Sarkies, {Mitchell N.} and Stephen Maloney and Mark Symmons and Haines, {Terry P.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.003",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Video strategies improved health professional knowledge across different contexts : a helix counterbalanced randomized controlled study. / Sarkies, Mitchell N.; Maloney, Stephen; Symmons, Mark; Haines, Terry P.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 112, 01.08.2019, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Video strategies improved health professional knowledge across different contexts

T2 - a helix counterbalanced randomized controlled study

AU - Sarkies, Mitchell N.

AU - Maloney, Stephen

AU - Symmons, Mark

AU - Haines, Terry P.

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Objective: This study aimed to apply a novel helix counterbalanced randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the effectiveness of video vs. written knowledge translation strategies for improving health professional knowledge of evidence provided in scientific journal articles. Study Design and Setting: A Helix counterbalanced randomized controlled trial was used to compare the impact of delivering research information via video or written modalities compared to a no-information control across three health contexts. Interventions were delivered and data collected via an online survey to nursing and allied health professionals across five hospitals within a public health service in Melbourne, Australia. A knowledge test measuring alignment between respondent perceived benefit of the intervention and conclusions listed in the journal article was the primary outcome. Results: There were 119 participants recruited with n = 13 incomplete responses. Exposure to the video increased the likelihood of a knowledge test response that was aligned with the research evidence compared to the no-information control (OR 2.61; 95% CI 1.40, 4.89; P = 0.003), but this was not the case for exposure to the written modality (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.75, 2.57; P = 0.294). Conclusion: Providing video knowledge translation strategies to nursing and allied health professionals increases the likelihood they will understand the main findings from scientific journal articles.

AB - Objective: This study aimed to apply a novel helix counterbalanced randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the effectiveness of video vs. written knowledge translation strategies for improving health professional knowledge of evidence provided in scientific journal articles. Study Design and Setting: A Helix counterbalanced randomized controlled trial was used to compare the impact of delivering research information via video or written modalities compared to a no-information control across three health contexts. Interventions were delivered and data collected via an online survey to nursing and allied health professionals across five hospitals within a public health service in Melbourne, Australia. A knowledge test measuring alignment between respondent perceived benefit of the intervention and conclusions listed in the journal article was the primary outcome. Results: There were 119 participants recruited with n = 13 incomplete responses. Exposure to the video increased the likelihood of a knowledge test response that was aligned with the research evidence compared to the no-information control (OR 2.61; 95% CI 1.40, 4.89; P = 0.003), but this was not the case for exposure to the written modality (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.75, 2.57; P = 0.294). Conclusion: Providing video knowledge translation strategies to nursing and allied health professionals increases the likelihood they will understand the main findings from scientific journal articles.

KW - Counterbalanced

KW - Deep vein thrombosis

KW - Evidence

KW - Falls

KW - Helix

KW - Implementation

KW - Professional education

KW - Randomised controlled trial

KW - Video

KW - Written

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065137519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.003

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

ER -