Venting anger in cyberspace: Self-entitlement versus self-preservation in #roadrage tweets

Amanda Stephens, Steven L. Trawley, Keis Ohtsuka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The increase in the popularity of social media and access to portable smart-technology means more drivers are using forums to vent their frustrations about driving. A content analysis was performed on 80,923 twitter posts relating to road rage collected over a 13-month period. The aim was to understand what sources of anger drivers report on social media. Approximately two thirds of the analysed tweets related directly to anger over another driver perceived as a perpetrator of inappropriate behaviour. Judgements of the improper speed of other drivers were the most common tweets. However, a general attitude also emerged where other drivers were seen as "idiots," "unskilled," and "should not be driving." Such a downward comparison is likely to predispose drivers to unjustly blame other drivers for frustrating situations that may be out of their control. Twitter appears to be a social media forum commonly used to vent anger by drivers. Posts ranged from text message, a photo of the offending vehicle or of the driver, or a 6-s video filmed while driving. The sample of tweeted angry comments indicated that many drivers used smart technology to express their anger. However, the motivation behind this action may vary and may be to express anger, report the incident, or to warn the public. The findings highlight the need for further research to understand the prevalence and danger of anger-provoked distraction with smart technology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)400-410
Number of pages10
JournalTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Volume42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Driving aggression
  • Driving anger
  • Online venting
  • Smart technology
  • Social media
  • Twitter

Cite this

@article{75bafabc8ad04f3782433621cd6ccd29,
title = "Venting anger in cyberspace: Self-entitlement versus self-preservation in #roadrage tweets",
abstract = "The increase in the popularity of social media and access to portable smart-technology means more drivers are using forums to vent their frustrations about driving. A content analysis was performed on 80,923 twitter posts relating to road rage collected over a 13-month period. The aim was to understand what sources of anger drivers report on social media. Approximately two thirds of the analysed tweets related directly to anger over another driver perceived as a perpetrator of inappropriate behaviour. Judgements of the improper speed of other drivers were the most common tweets. However, a general attitude also emerged where other drivers were seen as {"}idiots,{"} {"}unskilled,{"} and {"}should not be driving.{"} Such a downward comparison is likely to predispose drivers to unjustly blame other drivers for frustrating situations that may be out of their control. Twitter appears to be a social media forum commonly used to vent anger by drivers. Posts ranged from text message, a photo of the offending vehicle or of the driver, or a 6-s video filmed while driving. The sample of tweeted angry comments indicated that many drivers used smart technology to express their anger. However, the motivation behind this action may vary and may be to express anger, report the incident, or to warn the public. The findings highlight the need for further research to understand the prevalence and danger of anger-provoked distraction with smart technology.",
keywords = "Driving aggression, Driving anger, Online venting, Smart technology, Social media, Twitter",
author = "Amanda Stephens and Trawley, {Steven L.} and Keis Ohtsuka",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.trf.2016.01.006",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "400--410",
journal = "Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour",
issn = "1369-8478",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Venting anger in cyberspace : Self-entitlement versus self-preservation in #roadrage tweets. / Stephens, Amanda; Trawley, Steven L.; Ohtsuka, Keis.

In: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 42, 2016, p. 400-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Venting anger in cyberspace

T2 - Self-entitlement versus self-preservation in #roadrage tweets

AU - Stephens, Amanda

AU - Trawley, Steven L.

AU - Ohtsuka, Keis

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The increase in the popularity of social media and access to portable smart-technology means more drivers are using forums to vent their frustrations about driving. A content analysis was performed on 80,923 twitter posts relating to road rage collected over a 13-month period. The aim was to understand what sources of anger drivers report on social media. Approximately two thirds of the analysed tweets related directly to anger over another driver perceived as a perpetrator of inappropriate behaviour. Judgements of the improper speed of other drivers were the most common tweets. However, a general attitude also emerged where other drivers were seen as "idiots," "unskilled," and "should not be driving." Such a downward comparison is likely to predispose drivers to unjustly blame other drivers for frustrating situations that may be out of their control. Twitter appears to be a social media forum commonly used to vent anger by drivers. Posts ranged from text message, a photo of the offending vehicle or of the driver, or a 6-s video filmed while driving. The sample of tweeted angry comments indicated that many drivers used smart technology to express their anger. However, the motivation behind this action may vary and may be to express anger, report the incident, or to warn the public. The findings highlight the need for further research to understand the prevalence and danger of anger-provoked distraction with smart technology.

AB - The increase in the popularity of social media and access to portable smart-technology means more drivers are using forums to vent their frustrations about driving. A content analysis was performed on 80,923 twitter posts relating to road rage collected over a 13-month period. The aim was to understand what sources of anger drivers report on social media. Approximately two thirds of the analysed tweets related directly to anger over another driver perceived as a perpetrator of inappropriate behaviour. Judgements of the improper speed of other drivers were the most common tweets. However, a general attitude also emerged where other drivers were seen as "idiots," "unskilled," and "should not be driving." Such a downward comparison is likely to predispose drivers to unjustly blame other drivers for frustrating situations that may be out of their control. Twitter appears to be a social media forum commonly used to vent anger by drivers. Posts ranged from text message, a photo of the offending vehicle or of the driver, or a 6-s video filmed while driving. The sample of tweeted angry comments indicated that many drivers used smart technology to express their anger. However, the motivation behind this action may vary and may be to express anger, report the incident, or to warn the public. The findings highlight the need for further research to understand the prevalence and danger of anger-provoked distraction with smart technology.

KW - Driving aggression

KW - Driving anger

KW - Online venting

KW - Smart technology

KW - Social media

KW - Twitter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956862171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.trf.2016.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.trf.2016.01.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84956862171

VL - 42

SP - 400

EP - 410

JO - Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

JF - Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

SN - 1369-8478

ER -