TY - JOUR
T1 - Ventilatory demand during stepping and running
T2 - Implications for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children
AU - Selman, Jessyca P.
AU - Lanza, Fernanda C.
AU - Wandalsen, Gustavo F.
AU - Solé, Dirceu
AU - O’donnell, Denis E.
AU - Neder, J. Alberto
AU - Dal Corso, Simone
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Daedalus Enterprises.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Single-step tests have been proposed as simple and inexpensive challenges to diagnose exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in the pediatric population. Work performed and the resulting ventilation, however, might be substantially lower in stepping than running. This might decrease the diagnostic yield of step-based challenges. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 53 children with asthma with exercise-related symptoms (34 boys, age 6–18 y) underwent an incremental stepping test, a 6-min constant stepping test, and a treadmill running test on different days. RESULTS: Constant and incremental stepping tests presented with lower metabolic demands (VO2 1.42 ± 0.48 and 1.34 ± 0.55 L/min, respectively), ventilatory demands (VO2 45 ± 14 and 43 ± 16 L/min, respectively), and cardiovascular demands (160 ± 20 and 161 ± 19 beats/min, respectively) than the treadmill running test (1.65 ± 0.60 L/min, 54 ± 17 L/min, and 172 ± 7 beats/min, respectively) (P <.05). Between-test agreement in diagnosing EIB was poor (kappa 0.217–0.361). Although EIB prevalence was higher after the treadmill running test (60%) compared to constant (53%) and incremental (47%) stepping tests, 7 subjects developed EIB only in stepping. Clinical and resting functional characteristics did not differ in discordant subjects (ie, EIB negative in a given test but positive in another) versus concordant subjects (ie, EIB negative or positive in both tests). EIB was not related to individual test ability in eliciting high to very-high ventilation (> 40% or > 60% maximum voluntary ventilation, respectively). Moreover, a negative stepping test but a positive treadmill test (and vice versa) was not associated with greater ventilatory demands. CONCLUSIONS: Lower prevalence of EIB in stepping compared to treadmill running is not related to less ventilation demand in the former modality. Although stepping might be useful as a screening EIB test due its portability and low cost, a negative test should be confirmed with a running-based test in symptomatic children.
AB - BACKGROUND: Single-step tests have been proposed as simple and inexpensive challenges to diagnose exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in the pediatric population. Work performed and the resulting ventilation, however, might be substantially lower in stepping than running. This might decrease the diagnostic yield of step-based challenges. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 53 children with asthma with exercise-related symptoms (34 boys, age 6–18 y) underwent an incremental stepping test, a 6-min constant stepping test, and a treadmill running test on different days. RESULTS: Constant and incremental stepping tests presented with lower metabolic demands (VO2 1.42 ± 0.48 and 1.34 ± 0.55 L/min, respectively), ventilatory demands (VO2 45 ± 14 and 43 ± 16 L/min, respectively), and cardiovascular demands (160 ± 20 and 161 ± 19 beats/min, respectively) than the treadmill running test (1.65 ± 0.60 L/min, 54 ± 17 L/min, and 172 ± 7 beats/min, respectively) (P <.05). Between-test agreement in diagnosing EIB was poor (kappa 0.217–0.361). Although EIB prevalence was higher after the treadmill running test (60%) compared to constant (53%) and incremental (47%) stepping tests, 7 subjects developed EIB only in stepping. Clinical and resting functional characteristics did not differ in discordant subjects (ie, EIB negative in a given test but positive in another) versus concordant subjects (ie, EIB negative or positive in both tests). EIB was not related to individual test ability in eliciting high to very-high ventilation (> 40% or > 60% maximum voluntary ventilation, respectively). Moreover, a negative stepping test but a positive treadmill test (and vice versa) was not associated with greater ventilatory demands. CONCLUSIONS: Lower prevalence of EIB in stepping compared to treadmill running is not related to less ventilation demand in the former modality. Although stepping might be useful as a screening EIB test due its portability and low cost, a negative test should be confirmed with a running-based test in symptomatic children.
KW - Asthma
KW - Children
KW - Dyspnea
KW - Ex-ercise-induced ercise-induced asthma
KW - Ex-exercise
KW - Ventilation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064240085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4187/respcare.06363
DO - 10.4187/respcare.06363
M3 - Article
C2 - 30723167
AN - SCOPUS:85064240085
SN - 0020-1324
VL - 64
SP - 445
EP - 452
JO - Respiratory Care
JF - Respiratory Care
IS - 4
ER -