Projects per year
Abstract
Using theoretical and numerical results, we document the accuracy of commonly applied variational Bayes methods across a range of state space models. The results demonstrate that, in terms of accuracy on fixed parameters, there is a clear hierarchy in terms of the methods, with approaches that adequately approximate the states yielding superior accuracy over methods that do not. We also document numerically that over small out-of-sample evaluation periods the inferential discrepancies between the various methods often yield only small discrepancies in predictive accuracy. Nevertheless, in certain settings, and over a longer out-of-sample period, these predictive discrepancies can become meaningful. This finding indicates that the invariance of predictive results to inferential inaccuracy, which has been an oft-touted point made by practitioners seeking to justify the use of variational inference, is not ubiquitous and must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 793-804 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Bayesian consistency
- Probabilistic forecasting
- Scoring rules
- State space models
- Variational inference
Projects
- 2 Active
-
Loss-based Bayesian Prediction
Maneesoonthorn, O. (Primary Chief Investigator (PCI)), Martin, G. (Chief Investigator (CI)), Frazier, D. (Chief Investigator (CI)) & Hyndman, R. (Chief Investigator (CI))
19/06/20 → 18/06/25
Project: Research
-
Consequences of Model Misspecification in Approximate Bayesian Computation
Frazier, D. (Primary Chief Investigator (PCI))
Australian Research Council (ARC)
1/02/20 → 30/06/25
Project: Research