TY - JOUR
T1 - Variation in bus transit attribute perceptions between Australian cities
AU - Weliwitiya, Hesara
AU - Rahman, Mustafizur
AU - Horvat, Steven
AU - Tivendale, Knowles
AU - Currie, Graham
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research was funded from a research grant provided by Roads Australia.
Publisher Copyright:
© National Academy of Sciences: Transportation Research Board 2023.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - This paper explores user/nonuser perceptions of bus transit attributes in Melbourne, Sydney, and South East Queensland (SEQ). It aims to understand the relative importance and performance of various bus transit attributes and how the assessment varies according to city, socioeconomic cohort, and user/nonuser groups. Primary data were collected via a screening survey, enabling a very large sample (n = 13,537) and a smaller, more representative subset collating more detailed survey data (n = 2,420). Personal safety stood out as a key bus transit attribute of importance in all cities. Specifically, safety when traveling on the bus during the daytime and at night, and safety getting to and from the bus stop were ranked as very important bus transit attributes. Some findings differed by region: service levels, punctuality, frequency, and timetable adherence (reliability) were rated relatively high in importance but low in performance in Sydney and Melbourne compared with SEQ. This suggests that Melbourne and Sydney might require service-level improvements more immediately than SEQ. Implications for policy for each Australian metropolitan region (Sydney, Melbourne, and SEQ) are later discussed.
AB - This paper explores user/nonuser perceptions of bus transit attributes in Melbourne, Sydney, and South East Queensland (SEQ). It aims to understand the relative importance and performance of various bus transit attributes and how the assessment varies according to city, socioeconomic cohort, and user/nonuser groups. Primary data were collected via a screening survey, enabling a very large sample (n = 13,537) and a smaller, more representative subset collating more detailed survey data (n = 2,420). Personal safety stood out as a key bus transit attribute of importance in all cities. Specifically, safety when traveling on the bus during the daytime and at night, and safety getting to and from the bus stop were ranked as very important bus transit attributes. Some findings differed by region: service levels, punctuality, frequency, and timetable adherence (reliability) were rated relatively high in importance but low in performance in Sydney and Melbourne compared with SEQ. This suggests that Melbourne and Sydney might require service-level improvements more immediately than SEQ. Implications for policy for each Australian metropolitan region (Sydney, Melbourne, and SEQ) are later discussed.
KW - bus operator safety
KW - buses
KW - market
KW - public transportation
KW - transit safety and security
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180237563&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/03611981231207844
DO - 10.1177/03611981231207844
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85180237563
SN - 2169-4052
VL - 2678
SP - 501
EP - 514
JO - Transportation Research Record
JF - Transportation Research Record
IS - 7
ER -