TY - JOUR
T1 - Valuing environmental services provided by local stormwater management
AU - Brent, Daniel A.
AU - Gangadharan, Lata
AU - Lassiter, Allison
AU - Leroux, Anke
AU - Raschky, Paul A.
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - The management of stormwater runoff via distributed green infrastructures delivers a number of environmental services that go beyond the reduction of flood risk, which has been the focus of conventional stormwater systems. Not all of these services may be equally valued by the public, however. This paper estimates households' willingness to pay (WTP) for improvements in water security, stream health, recreational and amenity values, as well as reduction in flood risk and urban heat island effect. We use data from nearly 1000 personal interviews with residential homeowners in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. Our results suggest that the WTP for the highest levels of all environmental services is A$799 per household per year. WTP is mainly driven by residents valuing improvements in local stream health, exemptions in water restrictions, the prevention of flash flooding, and decreased peak urban temperatures respectively at A$297, A$244, A$104 and A$65 per year. We further conduct a benefit transfer analysis and find that the WTP and compensating surplus are not significantly different between the study areas. Our findings provide additional support that stormwater management via green infrastructures have large nonmarket benefits and that, under certain conditions, benefit values can be transferred to different locations.
AB - The management of stormwater runoff via distributed green infrastructures delivers a number of environmental services that go beyond the reduction of flood risk, which has been the focus of conventional stormwater systems. Not all of these services may be equally valued by the public, however. This paper estimates households' willingness to pay (WTP) for improvements in water security, stream health, recreational and amenity values, as well as reduction in flood risk and urban heat island effect. We use data from nearly 1000 personal interviews with residential homeowners in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. Our results suggest that the WTP for the highest levels of all environmental services is A$799 per household per year. WTP is mainly driven by residents valuing improvements in local stream health, exemptions in water restrictions, the prevention of flash flooding, and decreased peak urban temperatures respectively at A$297, A$244, A$104 and A$65 per year. We further conduct a benefit transfer analysis and find that the WTP and compensating surplus are not significantly different between the study areas. Our findings provide additional support that stormwater management via green infrastructures have large nonmarket benefits and that, under certain conditions, benefit values can be transferred to different locations.
KW - benefit transfer
KW - decentralized stormwater
KW - green infrastructure
KW - nonmarket goods
KW - water sensitive urban design
KW - willingness to pay
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024392395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/2016WR019776
DO - 10.1002/2016WR019776
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85024392395
SN - 0043-1397
VL - 53
SP - 4907
EP - 4921
JO - Water Resources Research
JF - Water Resources Research
IS - 6
ER -