Valuing environmental services provided by local stormwater management

Daniel A. Brent, Lata Gangadharan, Allison Lassiter, Anke Leroux, Paul A. Raschky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The management of stormwater runoff via distributed green infrastructures delivers a number of environmental services that go beyond the reduction of flood risk, which has been the focus of conventional stormwater systems. Not all of these services may be equally valued by the public, however. This paper estimates households' willingness to pay (WTP) for improvements in water security, stream health, recreational and amenity values, as well as reduction in flood risk and urban heat island effect. We use data from nearly 1000 personal interviews with residential homeowners in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. Our results suggest that the WTP for the highest levels of all environmental services is A$799 per household per year. WTP is mainly driven by residents valuing improvements in local stream health, exemptions in water restrictions, the prevention of flash flooding, and decreased peak urban temperatures respectively at A$297, A$244, A$104 and A$65 per year. We further conduct a benefit transfer analysis and find that the WTP and compensating surplus are not significantly different between the study areas. Our findings provide additional support that stormwater management via green infrastructures have large nonmarket benefits and that, under certain conditions, benefit values can be transferred to different locations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4907-4921
Number of pages15
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Keywords

  • benefit transfer
  • decentralized stormwater
  • green infrastructure
  • nonmarket goods
  • water sensitive urban design
  • willingness to pay

Cite this

@article{03df2df9e533456998ca488dedc23f40,
title = "Valuing environmental services provided by local stormwater management",
abstract = "The management of stormwater runoff via distributed green infrastructures delivers a number of environmental services that go beyond the reduction of flood risk, which has been the focus of conventional stormwater systems. Not all of these services may be equally valued by the public, however. This paper estimates households' willingness to pay (WTP) for improvements in water security, stream health, recreational and amenity values, as well as reduction in flood risk and urban heat island effect. We use data from nearly 1000 personal interviews with residential homeowners in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. Our results suggest that the WTP for the highest levels of all environmental services is A$799 per household per year. WTP is mainly driven by residents valuing improvements in local stream health, exemptions in water restrictions, the prevention of flash flooding, and decreased peak urban temperatures respectively at A$297, A$244, A$104 and A$65 per year. We further conduct a benefit transfer analysis and find that the WTP and compensating surplus are not significantly different between the study areas. Our findings provide additional support that stormwater management via green infrastructures have large nonmarket benefits and that, under certain conditions, benefit values can be transferred to different locations.",
keywords = "benefit transfer, decentralized stormwater, green infrastructure, nonmarket goods, water sensitive urban design, willingness to pay",
author = "Brent, {Daniel A.} and Lata Gangadharan and Allison Lassiter and Anke Leroux and Raschky, {Paul A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/2016WR019776",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "4907--4921",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "6",

}

Valuing environmental services provided by local stormwater management. / Brent, Daniel A.; Gangadharan, Lata; Lassiter, Allison; Leroux, Anke; Raschky, Paul A.

In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 53, No. 6, 01.06.2017, p. 4907-4921.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valuing environmental services provided by local stormwater management

AU - Brent, Daniel A.

AU - Gangadharan, Lata

AU - Lassiter, Allison

AU - Leroux, Anke

AU - Raschky, Paul A.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - The management of stormwater runoff via distributed green infrastructures delivers a number of environmental services that go beyond the reduction of flood risk, which has been the focus of conventional stormwater systems. Not all of these services may be equally valued by the public, however. This paper estimates households' willingness to pay (WTP) for improvements in water security, stream health, recreational and amenity values, as well as reduction in flood risk and urban heat island effect. We use data from nearly 1000 personal interviews with residential homeowners in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. Our results suggest that the WTP for the highest levels of all environmental services is A$799 per household per year. WTP is mainly driven by residents valuing improvements in local stream health, exemptions in water restrictions, the prevention of flash flooding, and decreased peak urban temperatures respectively at A$297, A$244, A$104 and A$65 per year. We further conduct a benefit transfer analysis and find that the WTP and compensating surplus are not significantly different between the study areas. Our findings provide additional support that stormwater management via green infrastructures have large nonmarket benefits and that, under certain conditions, benefit values can be transferred to different locations.

AB - The management of stormwater runoff via distributed green infrastructures delivers a number of environmental services that go beyond the reduction of flood risk, which has been the focus of conventional stormwater systems. Not all of these services may be equally valued by the public, however. This paper estimates households' willingness to pay (WTP) for improvements in water security, stream health, recreational and amenity values, as well as reduction in flood risk and urban heat island effect. We use data from nearly 1000 personal interviews with residential homeowners in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. Our results suggest that the WTP for the highest levels of all environmental services is A$799 per household per year. WTP is mainly driven by residents valuing improvements in local stream health, exemptions in water restrictions, the prevention of flash flooding, and decreased peak urban temperatures respectively at A$297, A$244, A$104 and A$65 per year. We further conduct a benefit transfer analysis and find that the WTP and compensating surplus are not significantly different between the study areas. Our findings provide additional support that stormwater management via green infrastructures have large nonmarket benefits and that, under certain conditions, benefit values can be transferred to different locations.

KW - benefit transfer

KW - decentralized stormwater

KW - green infrastructure

KW - nonmarket goods

KW - water sensitive urban design

KW - willingness to pay

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024392395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2016WR019776

DO - 10.1002/2016WR019776

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 4907

EP - 4921

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

IS - 6

ER -