Validity of self-reported versus hospital-coded diagnosis of stroke: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

Euzebiusz Fitzgerald Jamrozik; Zoe Hyde; Helman Alfonso; Leon Flicker; Osvaldo Almeida; Bu B Yeap; Paul Norman; Graeme John Hankey; Konrad Jamrozik

doi:10.1159/000358583

Validity of self-reported versus hospital-coded diagnosis of stroke: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

Euzebiusz Fitzgerald Jamrozik, Zoe Hyde, Helman Alfonso, Leon Flicker, Osvaldo Almeida, Bu B Yeap, Paul Norman, Graeme John Hankey, Konrad Jamrozik

Monash Bioethics Centre

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Population-based studies, as well as clinicians, often rely on self-report and hospital records to obtain a history of stroke. This study aimed to compare the validity of the diagnosis of stroke by self -report and by hospital coding according to their cross-sectional association with prevalent vascular risk factors, and longitudinal association with recurrent stroke and major cardiovascular outcomes in a large cohort of older Australian men.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	256 - 262
Number of pages	7
Journal	Cerebrovascular Diseases
Volume	37
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1159/000358583
Publication status	Published - 2014

Access to Document

10.1159/000358583

Cite this

@article{c7966264cc904e37bc77c975ee63ceb5,

title = "Validity of self-reported versus hospital-coded diagnosis of stroke: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study",

abstract = "Population-based studies, as well as clinicians, often rely on self-report and hospital records to obtain a history of stroke. This study aimed to compare the validity of the diagnosis of stroke by self -report and by hospital coding according to their cross-sectional association with prevalent vascular risk factors, and longitudinal association with recurrent stroke and major cardiovascular outcomes in a large cohort of older Australian men.",

author = "Jamrozik, {Euzebiusz Fitzgerald} and Zoe Hyde and Helman Alfonso and Leon Flicker and Osvaldo Almeida and Yeap, {Bu B} and Paul Norman and Hankey, {Graeme John} and Konrad Jamrozik",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1159/000358583",

language = "English",

volume = "37",

pages = "256 -- 262",

journal = "Cerebrovascular Diseases",

issn = "1015-9770",

publisher = "S Karger AG",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of self-reported versus hospital-coded diagnosis of stroke: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

AU - Jamrozik, Euzebiusz Fitzgerald

AU - Hyde, Zoe

AU - Alfonso, Helman

AU - Flicker, Leon

AU - Almeida, Osvaldo

AU - Yeap, Bu B

AU - Norman, Paul

AU - Hankey, Graeme John

AU - Jamrozik, Konrad

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Population-based studies, as well as clinicians, often rely on self-report and hospital records to obtain a history of stroke. This study aimed to compare the validity of the diagnosis of stroke by self -report and by hospital coding according to their cross-sectional association with prevalent vascular risk factors, and longitudinal association with recurrent stroke and major cardiovascular outcomes in a large cohort of older Australian men.

AB - Population-based studies, as well as clinicians, often rely on self-report and hospital records to obtain a history of stroke. This study aimed to compare the validity of the diagnosis of stroke by self -report and by hospital coding according to their cross-sectional association with prevalent vascular risk factors, and longitudinal association with recurrent stroke and major cardiovascular outcomes in a large cohort of older Australian men.

UR - http://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/358583

U2 - 10.1159/000358583

DO - 10.1159/000358583

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 256

EP - 262

JO - Cerebrovascular Diseases

JF - Cerebrovascular Diseases

SN - 1015-9770

IS - 4

ER -

Validity of self-reported versus hospital-coded diagnosis of stroke: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this