Validity of outcome measures used to assess one and six month outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients

Cameron Gosling, Belinda Gabbe, Owen Williamson, Ann Sutherland, Peter Cameron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A prospective validation trial was completed at a Level 1 adult trauma centre in Melbourne, Australia. One hundred and fifty four patients with orthopaedic trauma managed or followed-up by an orthopaedic unit were prospectively recruited. Patients with pathological fractures related to metastatic disease and/or an isolated orthopaedic injury, a documented history of mental illness or dementia or those for whom follow-up was likely to be difficult were excluded. The SF-12, SIP and SMFA were administered by a trained interviewer at one and six months. Each questionnaire was scored for the physical and mental components and then compared for content and construct validity at each time point.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1443 - 1448
Number of pages6
JournalInjury
Volume42
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Cite this