Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum

  • Robert F. Krueger
  • , Kelsey A. Hobbs
  • , Christopher C. Conway
  • , Danielle M. Dick
  • , Michael N. Dretsch
  • , Nicholas R. Eaton
  • , Miriam K. Forbes
  • , Kelsie T. Forbush
  • , Katherine M. Keyes
  • , Robert D. Latzman
  • , Giorgia Michelini
  • , Christopher J. Patrick
  • , Martin Sellbom
  • , Tim Slade
  • , Susan C South
  • , Matthew Sunderland
  • , Jennifer Tackett
  • , Irwin Waldman
  • , Monika A. Waszczuk
  • , Aidan G.C. Wright
  • David H. Zald, David Watson, Roman Kotov, HiTOP Utility Workgroup

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is an empirical effort to address limitations of traditional mental disorder diagnoses. These include arbitrary boundaries between disorder and normality, disorder co-occurrence in the modal case, heterogeneity of presentation within dis­orders, and instability of diagnosis within patients. This paper reviews the evidence on the validity and utility of the disinhibited externalizing and antagonistic externalizing spectra of HiTOP, which together constitute a broad externalizing superspectrum. These spectra are composed of elements subsumed within a variety of mental disorders described in recent DSM nosologies, including most notably substance use disorders and “Cluster B” personality disorders. The externalizing superspectrum ranges from normative levels of impulse control and self-assertion, to maladaptive disinhibition and antagonism, to extensive polysubstance involvement and personality psychopathology. A rich literature supports the validity of the externalizing superspectrum, and the disinhibited and antagonistic spectra. This evidence encompasses common genetic influences, environmental risk factors, childhood antecedents, cognitive abnormalities, neural alterations, and treatment response. The structure of these validators mirrors the structure of the phenotypic externalizing superspectrum, with some correlates more specific to disinhibited or antagonistic spectra, and others relevant to the entire externalizing superspectrum, underlining the hierarchical structure of the domain. Compared with traditional diagnostic categories, the externalizing superspectrum conceptualization shows improved utility, reliability, explanatory capacity, and clinical applicability. The externalizing superspectrum is one aspect of the general approach to psychopathology offered by HiTOP and can make diagnostic classification more useful in both research and the clinic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-193
Number of pages23
JournalWorld Psychiatry
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • antagonism
  • antisocial personality disorder
  • clinical utility
  • Cluster B personality disorders
  • disinhibition
  • externalizing
  • HiTOP
  • substance use dis­orders

Cite this