Utility-Based Quality of Life Associated With Overweight and Obesity: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study

Catherine L Keating, Anna Peeters, Boyd A. Swinburn, Dianna J. Magliano, Marjory L. Moodie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to estimate utility-based quality of life (UQoL) differences between healthy body weight and excess body weight categories. Design and Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 10,959 adults, participating in baseline data collection of the nationally representative Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle (AusDiab) Study was undertaken. Height and weight were measured by trained personnel. Body weight categories were assigned as healthy weight, overweight, and obesity subclasses I, II and III. UQoL was assessed using the SF-6D, which captures physical functioning, role limitation, social functioning, pain, mental health, and vitality on a score of 0.00-1.00 (worst-best). The relationship between body weight categories and UQoL was assessed using linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, education, and smoking. Results: Relative to the healthy weight group (mean UQoL score 0.77), mean adjusted UQoL differences (95% confidence intervals) were 0.001 (-0.008, 0.010) for overweight, -0.012 (-0.022, -0.001) for class-I obese, -0.020 (-0.041, 0.001) for class-II obese, and -0.069 (-0.099, -0.039) for class-III obese groups. Adding metabolic syndrome markers to the covariates had little impact on these differences. Conclusion: Results confirmed an inverse dose-response relationship between body weight and UQoL in this study of Australian adults. This highlights the need to incorporate UQoL measures which are sensitive to the subclasses of obesity when evaluating obesity interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)652-655
Number of pages4
JournalObesity
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

Cite this

@article{d15f0e620b71489da2d0f0cb217ac697,
title = "Utility-Based Quality of Life Associated With Overweight and Obesity: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study",
abstract = "Objective: This study aimed to estimate utility-based quality of life (UQoL) differences between healthy body weight and excess body weight categories. Design and Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 10,959 adults, participating in baseline data collection of the nationally representative Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle (AusDiab) Study was undertaken. Height and weight were measured by trained personnel. Body weight categories were assigned as healthy weight, overweight, and obesity subclasses I, II and III. UQoL was assessed using the SF-6D, which captures physical functioning, role limitation, social functioning, pain, mental health, and vitality on a score of 0.00-1.00 (worst-best). The relationship between body weight categories and UQoL was assessed using linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, education, and smoking. Results: Relative to the healthy weight group (mean UQoL score 0.77), mean adjusted UQoL differences (95{\%} confidence intervals) were 0.001 (-0.008, 0.010) for overweight, -0.012 (-0.022, -0.001) for class-I obese, -0.020 (-0.041, 0.001) for class-II obese, and -0.069 (-0.099, -0.039) for class-III obese groups. Adding metabolic syndrome markers to the covariates had little impact on these differences. Conclusion: Results confirmed an inverse dose-response relationship between body weight and UQoL in this study of Australian adults. This highlights the need to incorporate UQoL measures which are sensitive to the subclasses of obesity when evaluating obesity interventions.",
author = "Keating, {Catherine L} and Anna Peeters and Swinburn, {Boyd A.} and Magliano, {Dianna J.} and Moodie, {Marjory L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/oby.20290",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "652--655",
journal = "Obesity",
issn = "1930-7381",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Utility-Based Quality of Life Associated With Overweight and Obesity : The Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study. / Keating, Catherine L; Peeters, Anna; Swinburn, Boyd A.; Magliano, Dianna J.; Moodie, Marjory L.

In: Obesity, Vol. 21, No. 3, 03.2013, p. 652-655.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility-Based Quality of Life Associated With Overweight and Obesity

T2 - The Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study

AU - Keating, Catherine L

AU - Peeters, Anna

AU - Swinburn, Boyd A.

AU - Magliano, Dianna J.

AU - Moodie, Marjory L.

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Objective: This study aimed to estimate utility-based quality of life (UQoL) differences between healthy body weight and excess body weight categories. Design and Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 10,959 adults, participating in baseline data collection of the nationally representative Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle (AusDiab) Study was undertaken. Height and weight were measured by trained personnel. Body weight categories were assigned as healthy weight, overweight, and obesity subclasses I, II and III. UQoL was assessed using the SF-6D, which captures physical functioning, role limitation, social functioning, pain, mental health, and vitality on a score of 0.00-1.00 (worst-best). The relationship between body weight categories and UQoL was assessed using linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, education, and smoking. Results: Relative to the healthy weight group (mean UQoL score 0.77), mean adjusted UQoL differences (95% confidence intervals) were 0.001 (-0.008, 0.010) for overweight, -0.012 (-0.022, -0.001) for class-I obese, -0.020 (-0.041, 0.001) for class-II obese, and -0.069 (-0.099, -0.039) for class-III obese groups. Adding metabolic syndrome markers to the covariates had little impact on these differences. Conclusion: Results confirmed an inverse dose-response relationship between body weight and UQoL in this study of Australian adults. This highlights the need to incorporate UQoL measures which are sensitive to the subclasses of obesity when evaluating obesity interventions.

AB - Objective: This study aimed to estimate utility-based quality of life (UQoL) differences between healthy body weight and excess body weight categories. Design and Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 10,959 adults, participating in baseline data collection of the nationally representative Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle (AusDiab) Study was undertaken. Height and weight were measured by trained personnel. Body weight categories were assigned as healthy weight, overweight, and obesity subclasses I, II and III. UQoL was assessed using the SF-6D, which captures physical functioning, role limitation, social functioning, pain, mental health, and vitality on a score of 0.00-1.00 (worst-best). The relationship between body weight categories and UQoL was assessed using linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, education, and smoking. Results: Relative to the healthy weight group (mean UQoL score 0.77), mean adjusted UQoL differences (95% confidence intervals) were 0.001 (-0.008, 0.010) for overweight, -0.012 (-0.022, -0.001) for class-I obese, -0.020 (-0.041, 0.001) for class-II obese, and -0.069 (-0.099, -0.039) for class-III obese groups. Adding metabolic syndrome markers to the covariates had little impact on these differences. Conclusion: Results confirmed an inverse dose-response relationship between body weight and UQoL in this study of Australian adults. This highlights the need to incorporate UQoL measures which are sensitive to the subclasses of obesity when evaluating obesity interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027927215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/oby.20290

DO - 10.1002/oby.20290

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 652

EP - 655

JO - Obesity

JF - Obesity

SN - 1930-7381

IS - 3

ER -