Using the essential biodiversity variables framework to measure biodiversity change at national scale

Eren Turak, James Brazill-Boast, Tim Cooney, Michael Drielsma, Jocelyn DelaCruz, Gillian Dunkerley, Miguel Fernandez, Simon Ferrier, Mike Gill, Hugh Jones, Terry Koen, John Leys, Melodie McGeoch, Jean-Baptiste Mihoub, Peter Scanes, Dirk Schmeller, Kristen Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The essential biodiversity variables (EBV) framework was developed primarily to improve the detection of significant changes in global biodiversity. Its application at national level must support county-specific policy and management needs as well as allowing comparisons of estimates of biodiversity change between countries and their aggregation for reporting at regional, continental and global scales.Here we outline a process for prioritising biodiversity variables at national scale using the EBV framework. The process involves separately identifying candidate EBVs that are useful for tracking important changes in biodiversity in each major ecological feature in each ecoregion within a country. The list is then prioritised based on the proportion of ecological feature ecoregion combinations using each variable within and across terrestrial, marine and freshwater realms.We showcased this process in Australian state of New South Wales (NSW) using terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecoregions of the world as bioregional strata; vegetation formations as terrestrial ecological features, and broad aquatic ecosystem types as marine and freshwater ecological features. There was sufficient knowledge of ecological processes to identify useful variables for 85% of the ecological feature ecoregion combinations in NSW. Eleven candidate EBVs covering all six EBV classes, were useful in all three environmental realms.Our structured, stepwise approach to variable selection provides a transparent process for identifying important elements of ecological theory underpinning biodiversity monitoring within countries. Worldwide adoption of a process for prioritising biodiversity variables such as the one we propose here would help ensure consistency of national contributions to global biodiversity assessments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)264-271
Number of pages8
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume213
Issue numberPart B
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Keywords

  • Biodiversity assessments
  • Biodiversity observations
  • Essential biodiversity variables
  • Monitoring
  • National governments

Cite this

Turak, E., Brazill-Boast, J., Cooney, T., Drielsma, M., DelaCruz, J., Dunkerley, G., ... Williams, K. (2017). Using the essential biodiversity variables framework to measure biodiversity change at national scale. Biological Conservation, 213(Part B), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.019
Turak, Eren ; Brazill-Boast, James ; Cooney, Tim ; Drielsma, Michael ; DelaCruz, Jocelyn ; Dunkerley, Gillian ; Fernandez, Miguel ; Ferrier, Simon ; Gill, Mike ; Jones, Hugh ; Koen, Terry ; Leys, John ; McGeoch, Melodie ; Mihoub, Jean-Baptiste ; Scanes, Peter ; Schmeller, Dirk ; Williams, Kristen. / Using the essential biodiversity variables framework to measure biodiversity change at national scale. In: Biological Conservation. 2017 ; Vol. 213, No. Part B. pp. 264-271.
@article{be2d348e02df420abec04202c6807b6b,
title = "Using the essential biodiversity variables framework to measure biodiversity change at national scale",
abstract = "The essential biodiversity variables (EBV) framework was developed primarily to improve the detection of significant changes in global biodiversity. Its application at national level must support county-specific policy and management needs as well as allowing comparisons of estimates of biodiversity change between countries and their aggregation for reporting at regional, continental and global scales.Here we outline a process for prioritising biodiversity variables at national scale using the EBV framework. The process involves separately identifying candidate EBVs that are useful for tracking important changes in biodiversity in each major ecological feature in each ecoregion within a country. The list is then prioritised based on the proportion of ecological feature ecoregion combinations using each variable within and across terrestrial, marine and freshwater realms.We showcased this process in Australian state of New South Wales (NSW) using terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecoregions of the world as bioregional strata; vegetation formations as terrestrial ecological features, and broad aquatic ecosystem types as marine and freshwater ecological features. There was sufficient knowledge of ecological processes to identify useful variables for 85{\%} of the ecological feature ecoregion combinations in NSW. Eleven candidate EBVs covering all six EBV classes, were useful in all three environmental realms.Our structured, stepwise approach to variable selection provides a transparent process for identifying important elements of ecological theory underpinning biodiversity monitoring within countries. Worldwide adoption of a process for prioritising biodiversity variables such as the one we propose here would help ensure consistency of national contributions to global biodiversity assessments.",
keywords = "Biodiversity assessments, Biodiversity observations, Essential biodiversity variables, Monitoring, National governments",
author = "Eren Turak and James Brazill-Boast and Tim Cooney and Michael Drielsma and Jocelyn DelaCruz and Gillian Dunkerley and Miguel Fernandez and Simon Ferrier and Mike Gill and Hugh Jones and Terry Koen and John Leys and Melodie McGeoch and Jean-Baptiste Mihoub and Peter Scanes and Dirk Schmeller and Kristen Williams",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.019",
language = "English",
volume = "213",
pages = "264--271",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "Part B",

}

Turak, E, Brazill-Boast, J, Cooney, T, Drielsma, M, DelaCruz, J, Dunkerley, G, Fernandez, M, Ferrier, S, Gill, M, Jones, H, Koen, T, Leys, J, McGeoch, M, Mihoub, J-B, Scanes, P, Schmeller, D & Williams, K 2017, 'Using the essential biodiversity variables framework to measure biodiversity change at national scale' Biological Conservation, vol. 213, no. Part B, pp. 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.019

Using the essential biodiversity variables framework to measure biodiversity change at national scale. / Turak, Eren; Brazill-Boast, James; Cooney, Tim; Drielsma, Michael; DelaCruz, Jocelyn; Dunkerley, Gillian; Fernandez, Miguel; Ferrier, Simon; Gill, Mike; Jones, Hugh; Koen, Terry; Leys, John; McGeoch, Melodie; Mihoub, Jean-Baptiste; Scanes, Peter; Schmeller, Dirk; Williams, Kristen.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 213, No. Part B, 09.2017, p. 264-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using the essential biodiversity variables framework to measure biodiversity change at national scale

AU - Turak, Eren

AU - Brazill-Boast, James

AU - Cooney, Tim

AU - Drielsma, Michael

AU - DelaCruz, Jocelyn

AU - Dunkerley, Gillian

AU - Fernandez, Miguel

AU - Ferrier, Simon

AU - Gill, Mike

AU - Jones, Hugh

AU - Koen, Terry

AU - Leys, John

AU - McGeoch, Melodie

AU - Mihoub, Jean-Baptiste

AU - Scanes, Peter

AU - Schmeller, Dirk

AU - Williams, Kristen

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - The essential biodiversity variables (EBV) framework was developed primarily to improve the detection of significant changes in global biodiversity. Its application at national level must support county-specific policy and management needs as well as allowing comparisons of estimates of biodiversity change between countries and their aggregation for reporting at regional, continental and global scales.Here we outline a process for prioritising biodiversity variables at national scale using the EBV framework. The process involves separately identifying candidate EBVs that are useful for tracking important changes in biodiversity in each major ecological feature in each ecoregion within a country. The list is then prioritised based on the proportion of ecological feature ecoregion combinations using each variable within and across terrestrial, marine and freshwater realms.We showcased this process in Australian state of New South Wales (NSW) using terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecoregions of the world as bioregional strata; vegetation formations as terrestrial ecological features, and broad aquatic ecosystem types as marine and freshwater ecological features. There was sufficient knowledge of ecological processes to identify useful variables for 85% of the ecological feature ecoregion combinations in NSW. Eleven candidate EBVs covering all six EBV classes, were useful in all three environmental realms.Our structured, stepwise approach to variable selection provides a transparent process for identifying important elements of ecological theory underpinning biodiversity monitoring within countries. Worldwide adoption of a process for prioritising biodiversity variables such as the one we propose here would help ensure consistency of national contributions to global biodiversity assessments.

AB - The essential biodiversity variables (EBV) framework was developed primarily to improve the detection of significant changes in global biodiversity. Its application at national level must support county-specific policy and management needs as well as allowing comparisons of estimates of biodiversity change between countries and their aggregation for reporting at regional, continental and global scales.Here we outline a process for prioritising biodiversity variables at national scale using the EBV framework. The process involves separately identifying candidate EBVs that are useful for tracking important changes in biodiversity in each major ecological feature in each ecoregion within a country. The list is then prioritised based on the proportion of ecological feature ecoregion combinations using each variable within and across terrestrial, marine and freshwater realms.We showcased this process in Australian state of New South Wales (NSW) using terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecoregions of the world as bioregional strata; vegetation formations as terrestrial ecological features, and broad aquatic ecosystem types as marine and freshwater ecological features. There was sufficient knowledge of ecological processes to identify useful variables for 85% of the ecological feature ecoregion combinations in NSW. Eleven candidate EBVs covering all six EBV classes, were useful in all three environmental realms.Our structured, stepwise approach to variable selection provides a transparent process for identifying important elements of ecological theory underpinning biodiversity monitoring within countries. Worldwide adoption of a process for prioritising biodiversity variables such as the one we propose here would help ensure consistency of national contributions to global biodiversity assessments.

KW - Biodiversity assessments

KW - Biodiversity observations

KW - Essential biodiversity variables

KW - Monitoring

KW - National governments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994165225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.019

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.019

M3 - Article

VL - 213

SP - 264

EP - 271

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

IS - Part B

ER -

Turak E, Brazill-Boast J, Cooney T, Drielsma M, DelaCruz J, Dunkerley G et al. Using the essential biodiversity variables framework to measure biodiversity change at national scale. Biological Conservation. 2017 Sep;213(Part B):264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.019