Abstract
Background: Previously published triage tools for use at mass gathering events (MGE) lack real-world validation. Non-health care professionals, such as first aiders, first responders, and advanced responders often undertake a triage role at MGEs. This research aimed to determine consistency in the decision-making of a MGE triage tool. Method: Volunteer members of St John Ambulance Australia were recruited. Surveys included participant demographics and real-world clinical vignettes. Participants determined a triage category based on the vignettes and supplied triage tool. Demographics were analysed using descriptive statistics and responses to vignettes were analysed using Fleiss Kappa [p-bar]. Results: There were 110 participants, the majority male (60%), having completed a Bachelor or higher degree (53.6%), and were non-health care professionals (70%). Of the vignettes, there was a slightly better than moderate agreement (items: 18, p-bar: 0.55). There was an excellent level of agreeance for the resuscitation category (items: 3, b-par 0.69), and moderate level of agreeance for the urgent (items: 10, b-par 0.52) and minor (items: 5, b-par 0.52) categories. Conclusions: This research demonstrated similar findings to that of emergency department triage tool validation. Multi-country, multi-site, multi-type, real-world testing at MGEs is the next step to progress the development of this tool.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 147-150 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Australasian Emergency Care |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2020 |
Keywords
- Emergency medical services
- Health
- Mass gathering
- Planned event
- Triage
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver