Using ‘big ideas’ to enhance teaching and student learning

Ian Mitchell, Stephen Keast, Debra Panizzon, Judie Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Organising teaching of a topic around a small number of ‘big ideas’ has been argued by many to be important in teaching for deep understanding, with big ideas being able to link different activities and to be framed in ways that provide perceived relevance and routes into engagement. However it is our view that, at present, the significance of big ideas in classroom practice is underappreciated while their implementation in teaching is perceived as ‘unproblematic’. In this paper we address these issues; while we draw on the experiences of two major research projects focusing on teachers’ pedagogical reasoning, we attempt to investigate big ideas from a conceptual stance. While the domain is important, we argue that the source of big ideas should include reflection on issues of student learning and engagement as well as the domain. Moreover, big ideas should be framed in ways that are richer, more generative of teaching ideas and more pedagogically powerful than topic headings. This means framing them as a sentence, with a verb, that provides direction and ideas for teachers. We posit three different kinds of big ideas: big ideas about content, big ideas about learning and big ideas about the domain; the last two result in teachers having parallel agendas to their content agendas. In addition to discussing how pedagogically powerful big ideas can be constructed, we draw on data from highly skilled teachers to extend thinking about how teachers can use big ideas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)596-610
Number of pages15
JournalTeachers and teaching: theory and practice
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2017

Keywords

  • Big ideas
  • metacognition
  • pedagogical purposes
  • pedagogical reasoning

Cite this

Mitchell, Ian ; Keast, Stephen ; Panizzon, Debra ; Mitchell, Judie. / Using ‘big ideas’ to enhance teaching and student learning. In: Teachers and teaching: theory and practice. 2017 ; Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 596-610.
@article{b1556ad5bc3c422f8da72db393340e14,
title = "Using ‘big ideas’ to enhance teaching and student learning",
abstract = "Organising teaching of a topic around a small number of ‘big ideas’ has been argued by many to be important in teaching for deep understanding, with big ideas being able to link different activities and to be framed in ways that provide perceived relevance and routes into engagement. However it is our view that, at present, the significance of big ideas in classroom practice is underappreciated while their implementation in teaching is perceived as ‘unproblematic’. In this paper we address these issues; while we draw on the experiences of two major research projects focusing on teachers’ pedagogical reasoning, we attempt to investigate big ideas from a conceptual stance. While the domain is important, we argue that the source of big ideas should include reflection on issues of student learning and engagement as well as the domain. Moreover, big ideas should be framed in ways that are richer, more generative of teaching ideas and more pedagogically powerful than topic headings. This means framing them as a sentence, with a verb, that provides direction and ideas for teachers. We posit three different kinds of big ideas: big ideas about content, big ideas about learning and big ideas about the domain; the last two result in teachers having parallel agendas to their content agendas. In addition to discussing how pedagogically powerful big ideas can be constructed, we draw on data from highly skilled teachers to extend thinking about how teachers can use big ideas.",
keywords = "Big ideas, metacognition, pedagogical purposes, pedagogical reasoning",
author = "Ian Mitchell and Stephen Keast and Debra Panizzon and Judie Mitchell",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/13540602.2016.1218328",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "596--610",
journal = "Teachers and teaching: theory and practice",
issn = "1354-0602",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

Using ‘big ideas’ to enhance teaching and student learning. / Mitchell, Ian; Keast, Stephen; Panizzon, Debra; Mitchell, Judie.

In: Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, Vol. 23, No. 5, 04.07.2017, p. 596-610.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using ‘big ideas’ to enhance teaching and student learning

AU - Mitchell, Ian

AU - Keast, Stephen

AU - Panizzon, Debra

AU - Mitchell, Judie

PY - 2017/7/4

Y1 - 2017/7/4

N2 - Organising teaching of a topic around a small number of ‘big ideas’ has been argued by many to be important in teaching for deep understanding, with big ideas being able to link different activities and to be framed in ways that provide perceived relevance and routes into engagement. However it is our view that, at present, the significance of big ideas in classroom practice is underappreciated while their implementation in teaching is perceived as ‘unproblematic’. In this paper we address these issues; while we draw on the experiences of two major research projects focusing on teachers’ pedagogical reasoning, we attempt to investigate big ideas from a conceptual stance. While the domain is important, we argue that the source of big ideas should include reflection on issues of student learning and engagement as well as the domain. Moreover, big ideas should be framed in ways that are richer, more generative of teaching ideas and more pedagogically powerful than topic headings. This means framing them as a sentence, with a verb, that provides direction and ideas for teachers. We posit three different kinds of big ideas: big ideas about content, big ideas about learning and big ideas about the domain; the last two result in teachers having parallel agendas to their content agendas. In addition to discussing how pedagogically powerful big ideas can be constructed, we draw on data from highly skilled teachers to extend thinking about how teachers can use big ideas.

AB - Organising teaching of a topic around a small number of ‘big ideas’ has been argued by many to be important in teaching for deep understanding, with big ideas being able to link different activities and to be framed in ways that provide perceived relevance and routes into engagement. However it is our view that, at present, the significance of big ideas in classroom practice is underappreciated while their implementation in teaching is perceived as ‘unproblematic’. In this paper we address these issues; while we draw on the experiences of two major research projects focusing on teachers’ pedagogical reasoning, we attempt to investigate big ideas from a conceptual stance. While the domain is important, we argue that the source of big ideas should include reflection on issues of student learning and engagement as well as the domain. Moreover, big ideas should be framed in ways that are richer, more generative of teaching ideas and more pedagogically powerful than topic headings. This means framing them as a sentence, with a verb, that provides direction and ideas for teachers. We posit three different kinds of big ideas: big ideas about content, big ideas about learning and big ideas about the domain; the last two result in teachers having parallel agendas to their content agendas. In addition to discussing how pedagogically powerful big ideas can be constructed, we draw on data from highly skilled teachers to extend thinking about how teachers can use big ideas.

KW - Big ideas

KW - metacognition

KW - pedagogical purposes

KW - pedagogical reasoning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982266836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13540602.2016.1218328

DO - 10.1080/13540602.2016.1218328

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 596

EP - 610

JO - Teachers and teaching: theory and practice

JF - Teachers and teaching: theory and practice

SN - 1354-0602

IS - 5

ER -