Uses of strength-based interventions for people with serious mental illness

A critical review

Samson Tse, Emily W.S. Tsoi, Bridget Elizabeth Hamilton, Mary O'Hagan, Geoff Shepherd, Mike Slade, Rob Whitley, Melissa Petrakis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: For the past 3 decades, mental health practitioners have increasingly adopted aspects and tools of strength-based approaches. Providing strength-based intervention and amplifying strengths relies heavily on effective interpersonal processes. Aim: This article is a critical review of research regarding the use of strength-based approaches in mental health service settings. The aim is to discuss strength-based interventions within broader research on recovery, focussing on effectiveness and advances in practice where applicable. Method: A systematic search for peer-reviewed intervention studies published between 2001 and December 2014 yielded 55 articles of potential relevance to the review. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to appraise the quality of the studies. Our review found emerging evidence that the utilisation of a strength-based approach improves outcomes including hospitalisation rates, employment/educational attainment, and intrapersonal outcomes such as self-efficacy and sense of hope. Conclusion: Recent studies confirm the feasibility of implementing a high-fidelity strength-based approach in clinical settings and its relevance for practitioners in health care. More high-quality studies are needed to further examine the effectiveness of strength-based approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-291
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Social Psychiatry
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Keywords

  • Case management
  • community mental health
  • positive psychology
  • recovery

Cite this

Tse, Samson ; Tsoi, Emily W.S. ; Hamilton, Bridget Elizabeth ; O'Hagan, Mary ; Shepherd, Geoff ; Slade, Mike ; Whitley, Rob ; Petrakis, Melissa. / Uses of strength-based interventions for people with serious mental illness : A critical review. In: International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2016 ; Vol. 62, No. 3. pp. 281-291.
@article{5e0ae4ec71b24b578fae4882490c1642,
title = "Uses of strength-based interventions for people with serious mental illness: A critical review",
abstract = "Background: For the past 3 decades, mental health practitioners have increasingly adopted aspects and tools of strength-based approaches. Providing strength-based intervention and amplifying strengths relies heavily on effective interpersonal processes. Aim: This article is a critical review of research regarding the use of strength-based approaches in mental health service settings. The aim is to discuss strength-based interventions within broader research on recovery, focussing on effectiveness and advances in practice where applicable. Method: A systematic search for peer-reviewed intervention studies published between 2001 and December 2014 yielded 55 articles of potential relevance to the review. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to appraise the quality of the studies. Our review found emerging evidence that the utilisation of a strength-based approach improves outcomes including hospitalisation rates, employment/educational attainment, and intrapersonal outcomes such as self-efficacy and sense of hope. Conclusion: Recent studies confirm the feasibility of implementing a high-fidelity strength-based approach in clinical settings and its relevance for practitioners in health care. More high-quality studies are needed to further examine the effectiveness of strength-based approaches.",
keywords = "Case management, community mental health, positive psychology, recovery",
author = "Samson Tse and Tsoi, {Emily W.S.} and Hamilton, {Bridget Elizabeth} and Mary O'Hagan and Geoff Shepherd and Mike Slade and Rob Whitley and Melissa Petrakis",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0020764015623970",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "281--291",
journal = "International Journal of Social Psychiatry",
issn = "0020-7640",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Uses of strength-based interventions for people with serious mental illness : A critical review. / Tse, Samson; Tsoi, Emily W.S.; Hamilton, Bridget Elizabeth; O'Hagan, Mary; Shepherd, Geoff; Slade, Mike; Whitley, Rob; Petrakis, Melissa.

In: International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Vol. 62, No. 3, 01.02.2016, p. 281-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uses of strength-based interventions for people with serious mental illness

T2 - A critical review

AU - Tse, Samson

AU - Tsoi, Emily W.S.

AU - Hamilton, Bridget Elizabeth

AU - O'Hagan, Mary

AU - Shepherd, Geoff

AU - Slade, Mike

AU - Whitley, Rob

AU - Petrakis, Melissa

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Background: For the past 3 decades, mental health practitioners have increasingly adopted aspects and tools of strength-based approaches. Providing strength-based intervention and amplifying strengths relies heavily on effective interpersonal processes. Aim: This article is a critical review of research regarding the use of strength-based approaches in mental health service settings. The aim is to discuss strength-based interventions within broader research on recovery, focussing on effectiveness and advances in practice where applicable. Method: A systematic search for peer-reviewed intervention studies published between 2001 and December 2014 yielded 55 articles of potential relevance to the review. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to appraise the quality of the studies. Our review found emerging evidence that the utilisation of a strength-based approach improves outcomes including hospitalisation rates, employment/educational attainment, and intrapersonal outcomes such as self-efficacy and sense of hope. Conclusion: Recent studies confirm the feasibility of implementing a high-fidelity strength-based approach in clinical settings and its relevance for practitioners in health care. More high-quality studies are needed to further examine the effectiveness of strength-based approaches.

AB - Background: For the past 3 decades, mental health practitioners have increasingly adopted aspects and tools of strength-based approaches. Providing strength-based intervention and amplifying strengths relies heavily on effective interpersonal processes. Aim: This article is a critical review of research regarding the use of strength-based approaches in mental health service settings. The aim is to discuss strength-based interventions within broader research on recovery, focussing on effectiveness and advances in practice where applicable. Method: A systematic search for peer-reviewed intervention studies published between 2001 and December 2014 yielded 55 articles of potential relevance to the review. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to appraise the quality of the studies. Our review found emerging evidence that the utilisation of a strength-based approach improves outcomes including hospitalisation rates, employment/educational attainment, and intrapersonal outcomes such as self-efficacy and sense of hope. Conclusion: Recent studies confirm the feasibility of implementing a high-fidelity strength-based approach in clinical settings and its relevance for practitioners in health care. More high-quality studies are needed to further examine the effectiveness of strength-based approaches.

KW - Case management

KW - community mental health

KW - positive psychology

KW - recovery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963768829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0020764015623970

DO - 10.1177/0020764015623970

M3 - Review Article

VL - 62

SP - 281

EP - 291

JO - International Journal of Social Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Social Psychiatry

SN - 0020-7640

IS - 3

ER -