Use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function to determine aortic pressure augmentation in subjects with treated hypertension

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

117 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. The purposes of this study were to investigate the use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function for the assessment of central aortic pressure augmentation in subjects taking commonly used antihypertensive agents (angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic blockers, Ca2+ antagonists, diuretic therapy). Background. Applanation tonometry of the radial artery with a generalized transfer function has been proposed as a means of assessing central aortic blood pressure. Recently, a commercial apparatus based on this technique has become- available; we therefore examined the effect of a generalized transfer function on derived central aortic pressure compared with measured brachial blood pressures and also investigated the potential of this technique to assess the influence of differing drug therapy. Methods. Two hundred and sixty-two hypertensive patients on stable medication were studied using the PWV Medical Blood Pressure Analysis System (version 2, DAT-1). Results. In univariate analysis, augmentation index showed association with age, sex, height and heart rate. In multivariate analysis, diastolic blood pressure and age (positively), height and heart rate (negatively) and sex were significantly associated. After adjustment for these variables, pressure augmentation was not associated with any antihypertensive treatment investigated. Linear relationships were demonstrated between brachial blood pressures and corresponding central pressures derived by transfer function methods. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that if adjustment for central-peripheral pressure difference is necessary, simple linear relationships may be sufficient. Age, heart rate and height but not the class of antihypertensive medication affected the degree of pressure augmentation observed using this technique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1214-1220
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 1998

Cite this

@article{d4c9b8be520f413e93b5ad336ed2adc9,
title = "Use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function to determine aortic pressure augmentation in subjects with treated hypertension",
abstract = "Objectives. The purposes of this study were to investigate the use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function for the assessment of central aortic pressure augmentation in subjects taking commonly used antihypertensive agents (angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic blockers, Ca2+ antagonists, diuretic therapy). Background. Applanation tonometry of the radial artery with a generalized transfer function has been proposed as a means of assessing central aortic blood pressure. Recently, a commercial apparatus based on this technique has become- available; we therefore examined the effect of a generalized transfer function on derived central aortic pressure compared with measured brachial blood pressures and also investigated the potential of this technique to assess the influence of differing drug therapy. Methods. Two hundred and sixty-two hypertensive patients on stable medication were studied using the PWV Medical Blood Pressure Analysis System (version 2, DAT-1). Results. In univariate analysis, augmentation index showed association with age, sex, height and heart rate. In multivariate analysis, diastolic blood pressure and age (positively), height and heart rate (negatively) and sex were significantly associated. After adjustment for these variables, pressure augmentation was not associated with any antihypertensive treatment investigated. Linear relationships were demonstrated between brachial blood pressures and corresponding central pressures derived by transfer function methods. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that if adjustment for central-peripheral pressure difference is necessary, simple linear relationships may be sufficient. Age, heart rate and height but not the class of antihypertensive medication affected the degree of pressure augmentation observed using this technique.",
author = "Cameron, {James D.} and Mcgrath, {Barry P.} and Dart, {Anthony M.}",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00411-2",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1214--1220",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function to determine aortic pressure augmentation in subjects with treated hypertension

AU - Cameron, James D.

AU - Mcgrath, Barry P.

AU - Dart, Anthony M.

PY - 1998/11/1

Y1 - 1998/11/1

N2 - Objectives. The purposes of this study were to investigate the use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function for the assessment of central aortic pressure augmentation in subjects taking commonly used antihypertensive agents (angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic blockers, Ca2+ antagonists, diuretic therapy). Background. Applanation tonometry of the radial artery with a generalized transfer function has been proposed as a means of assessing central aortic blood pressure. Recently, a commercial apparatus based on this technique has become- available; we therefore examined the effect of a generalized transfer function on derived central aortic pressure compared with measured brachial blood pressures and also investigated the potential of this technique to assess the influence of differing drug therapy. Methods. Two hundred and sixty-two hypertensive patients on stable medication were studied using the PWV Medical Blood Pressure Analysis System (version 2, DAT-1). Results. In univariate analysis, augmentation index showed association with age, sex, height and heart rate. In multivariate analysis, diastolic blood pressure and age (positively), height and heart rate (negatively) and sex were significantly associated. After adjustment for these variables, pressure augmentation was not associated with any antihypertensive treatment investigated. Linear relationships were demonstrated between brachial blood pressures and corresponding central pressures derived by transfer function methods. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that if adjustment for central-peripheral pressure difference is necessary, simple linear relationships may be sufficient. Age, heart rate and height but not the class of antihypertensive medication affected the degree of pressure augmentation observed using this technique.

AB - Objectives. The purposes of this study were to investigate the use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function for the assessment of central aortic pressure augmentation in subjects taking commonly used antihypertensive agents (angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic blockers, Ca2+ antagonists, diuretic therapy). Background. Applanation tonometry of the radial artery with a generalized transfer function has been proposed as a means of assessing central aortic blood pressure. Recently, a commercial apparatus based on this technique has become- available; we therefore examined the effect of a generalized transfer function on derived central aortic pressure compared with measured brachial blood pressures and also investigated the potential of this technique to assess the influence of differing drug therapy. Methods. Two hundred and sixty-two hypertensive patients on stable medication were studied using the PWV Medical Blood Pressure Analysis System (version 2, DAT-1). Results. In univariate analysis, augmentation index showed association with age, sex, height and heart rate. In multivariate analysis, diastolic blood pressure and age (positively), height and heart rate (negatively) and sex were significantly associated. After adjustment for these variables, pressure augmentation was not associated with any antihypertensive treatment investigated. Linear relationships were demonstrated between brachial blood pressures and corresponding central pressures derived by transfer function methods. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that if adjustment for central-peripheral pressure difference is necessary, simple linear relationships may be sufficient. Age, heart rate and height but not the class of antihypertensive medication affected the degree of pressure augmentation observed using this technique.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032211121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00411-2

DO - 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00411-2

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1214

EP - 1220

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 5

ER -